Reasons not to use MS DNS ?

[Guest]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.dns (More info?)

I have one of "those gurus" here questioning why not use a DNS appliance or
solution other than the current Microsoft DNS Server (Win2003) we have.

We have an Active Directory and DNS ADI is important to us. Other than the
the expertise we have in house and that the MS DNS has been working fine to
us to my knowledge, please advise whether people has been successful using
Active Directory with other DNS servers/solutions.

 

[Frankster]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.dns (More info?)

So, you have one of "those gurus" wanting to fix something that is not
broken eh...? Why don't you tell us his *real* agenda?

-Frank

"Marlon" <marlon-nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:uKutYMrkFHA.4024@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>I have one of "those gurus" here questioning why not use a DNS appliance or
> solution other than the current Microsoft DNS Server (Win2003) we have.
>
> We have an Active Directory and DNS ADI is important to us. Other than the
> the expertise we have in house and that the MS DNS has been working fine
> to
> us to my knowledge, please advise whether people has been successful using
> Active Directory with other DNS servers/solutions.
>
>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.dns (More info?)

In news:uKutYMrkFHA.4024@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl,
Marlon <marlon-nospam@hotmail.com> stated, which I then commented on below:
> I have one of "those gurus" here questioning why not use a DNS
> appliance or solution other than the current Microsoft DNS Server
> (Win2003) we have.
>
> We have an Active Directory and DNS ADI is important to us. Other
> than the the expertise we have in house and that the MS DNS has been
> working fine to us to my knowledge, please advise whether people has
> been successful using Active Directory with other DNS
> servers/solutions.

Other solutions exist, including NetIQ's MetaIP or Lucent's QIP, and BIND
DNS. The previous two are quite expensive and would need some real
justification if it's feature set is what you're looking for. For the most
part, it is usually recommended to stick with MS DNS because it "just
works". Many engineers out in these groups will agree with that assesment.
The products listed do not support interoperably (as far as my knowledge)
secure updates, which I know BIND doesn't. BIND uses TSIG (transaction
signatures), but are not compatible with Windows AD and Kerberos.

If you can state your current infrastructure, scenario, number of seats and
the reasons why you're organization is considering a change to another
solution, we can comment to better assist you.

--
Regards,
Ace

Please direct all replies ONLY to the Microsoft public newsgroups
so all can benefit.

This posting is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties or guarantees
and confers no rights.

Ace Fekay, MCSE 2003 & 2000, MCSA 2003 & 2000, MCSE+I, MCT, MVP
Microsoft Windows MVP - Windows Server - Directory Services
Infinite Diversities in Infinite Combinations.
=================================

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.dns (More info?)

"" wrote:
> So, you have one of "those gurus" wanting to fix something
> that is not
> broken eh...? Why don't you tell us his *real* agenda?
>
> -Frank
>
> "Marlon" <marlon-nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:uKutYMrkFHA.4024@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> >I have one of "those gurus" here questioning why not use a
> DNS appliance or
> > solution other than the current Microsoft DNS Server
> (Win2003) we have.
> >
> > We have an Active Directory and DNS ADI is important to us.
> Other than the
> > the expertise we have in house and that the MS DNS has been
> working fine
> > to
> > us to my knowledge, please advise whether people has been
> successful using
> > Active Directory with other DNS servers/solutions.
> >
> >

Will that appliance support ALL the features AD-I DNS does? Why should
it replace the MS DNS? What are the reasons?

--
Posted using the http://www.windowsforumz.com interface, at author's request
Articles individually checked for conformance to usenet standards
Topic URL: http://www.windowsforumz.com/DNS-Reasons-MS-ftopict401323.html
Visit Topic URL to contact author (reg. req'd). Report abuse: http://www.windowsforumz.com/eform.php?p=1327612

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.dns (More info?)

I am afraid his agenda is an awful anger and irrational opposition to any MS
product.

"Frankster" <Frank@SPAM2TRASH.com> wrote in message
news:y96dnVHvv4UpN3rfRVn-og@giganews.com...
> So, you have one of "those gurus" wanting to fix something that is not
> broken eh...? Why don't you tell us his *real* agenda?
>
> -Frank
>
> "Marlon" <marlon-nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:uKutYMrkFHA.4024@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>>I have one of "those gurus" here questioning why not use a DNS appliance
>>or
>> solution other than the current Microsoft DNS Server (Win2003) we have.
>>
>> We have an Active Directory and DNS ADI is important to us. Other than
>> the
>> the expertise we have in house and that the MS DNS has been working fine
>> to
>> us to my knowledge, please advise whether people has been successful
>> using
>> Active Directory with other DNS servers/solutions.
>>
>>
>
>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.dns (More info?)

In news:%23HU7gS%23kFHA.3436@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl,
Marlon Brown <nospamarlon@hotmail.com> stated, which I then commented on
below:
> I am afraid his agenda is an awful anger and irrational opposition to
> any MS product.

There's always one in every crowd who's closed minded.

 

[Frankster]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.dns (More info?)

>I am afraid his agenda is an awful anger and irrational opposition to any
>MS product.

Why did I know that already! LOL!

-Frank

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.dns (More info?)

>> "Marlon" <marlon-nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:uKutYMrkFHA.4024@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>>>I have one of "those gurus" here questioning why not use a DNS appliance
>>>or
>>> solution other than the current Microsoft DNS Server (Win2003) we have.
>>>
>>> We have an Active Directory and DNS ADI is important to us. Other than
>>> the
>>> the expertise we have in house and that the MS DNS has been working fine
>>> to
>>> us to my knowledge, please advise whether people has been successful
>>> using
>>> Active Directory with other DNS servers/solutions.

Have *him* suggest a working alternative. Along with a cost
justification.

Jeff