Archived from groups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet (
More info?)
"Diego" <diego_daulignac@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:crh0tb$k21$1@news.mch.sbs.de...
> Hello,
>
> I hear a lot these days about ethernet deployment in metropolitan areas
> as access networks. Does this mean that there would be one big optical
> ethernet LAN (or MAN if you prefer) with fiber to the home connected by
> switches?
in the UK there are fibre point to point links using ethernet (LAN extension
service, or LES). The BT service is most common and it uses dedicated pair
of fibres per link. You use it as a connection between 2 sites, up to 25 Km
apart, although the costs can go up a lot over more than 5 to 10 Km.
other telcos either use the BT links, or their own Ethernet pipes or a mix
to build more complex networks.
you can transport the ethernet directly on fibre, over SDH, using CWDM or
DWDM to reduce the number of cores, over ATM etc. - all of these are in use
here by various telcos. What you choose depends on how far you need to go,
and how fibre "rich" the supplier is.
Some of these give you a strictly point to point connection, other are more
flexible. so on some SDH gear you may have a point to multipoint style
service, where 1 ethernet port at a central pointhas traffic on multiple
VLANs, and packets from each VLAN may end up at a different port somewhere
in the SDH cloud.
so, you may get your corporate internet feed on a 100M ethernet to the
nearest Pop for your favorite ISP, or it may be an access line to your MPLS
network and so on.
In that case I have a few questions:
>
> 1. Wouldn't this lead to massive spanning trees in large cities? One bad
> configuration in the network would affect the whole network.
you can do this, and some nets have used this in the UK - several school
networks join sites in star or ring topology with ethernet layer 2 switches
to glue it all together (usually to keep the price down).
even where this topology is in use, you normally get a limited group of
users, usually part of the same community, so the layer 2 network is
restricted in size.
>
> 2. Will all IP traffic have to travel to the core even if it is destined
> for an intra-MAN destination? I cannot imagine that a ARP broadcast in a
> large MAN is feasable.
worse yet - imagine a misconfigured set of routers which are replicating
NetBIOS broadcasts by accident - or a loop replicating 100k broadcasts /sec
actually - you just described some of the drawbacks of layer 2 over MPLS -
which is intended to give you an emulated Ethernet, possibly across a
continent.
>
> 3. Will these networks co-exist with the current networks, or are they
> meant to replace the current infrastructure?
Nothing ever replaces all the installed base - these things will co-exist
with conventional networks for a long time, even if they become the
connection of choice.
And here there doesnt seem any prospect of universal broadband in the near
future, never mind a fibre only service - so there should always be a need
for something else. But - it may overtake some types of connection -
anything over 2 Mbps looks to be a possibility.
In that case will VoIP
> replace the POTS?
in the UK BT has announced they want all public PBXes to go Voip - but again
it may take a while (the press release says 10 years - i suspect a lot
longer to get your granny in a remote farmhouse to get rid of an analog
phone)
Will the MANs have sufficient QoS to handle voice?
that bit is doable now.
But an classic ethernet point to point link doesnt need QoS - throw the bits
in 1 end and they fall out the other a fixed time later in the same order.
QoS only has an effect when you have 2 or more packets in a queue and you
need to decide which to send 1st.
it is just the complicated electronics that link the ethernet pipes together
that take account of QoS.
>
> I would appreciate any comments on these questions or your ideas on how
> the metro access networks of the future will look like.
i just wish work would embrace it a bit more quickly - it would make my job
designing networks easier.
>
> Regards,
> Diego
>
> -----
>
> diego_daulignac at yahoo dot com
> www.aulignac.com
--
Regards
Stephen Hope - return address needs fewer xxs