Archived from groups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet (More info?)
In article <5b8021hsb36eaq6ogqpl1qo9b4enq05lie@4ax.com>,
ken.roberts@adelphia.net says...
> Here is what I know, so far - please fill in the missing ones -
> thanks:
>
> Layer 7 -
> Layer 6 -
> Layer 5 - Message? (not sure)
> Layer 4 - Segment (TCP)
> Layer 3 - Packet or Datagram (IP)
> Layer 2 - Frame (Frame Relay) or Cell (ATM)
> Layer 1 - Frame (T-carrier 193-bit frames for example)
Google is your friend.
There's also the local library.
--
Dr. Anton T. Squeegee, Director, Dutch Surrealist Plumbing Institute.
(Known to some as Bruce Lane, ARS KC7GR,
kyrrin (a/t) bluefeathertech[d=o=t]calm -- www.bluefeathertech.com "If Salvador Dali had owned a computer, would it have been equipped
with surreal ports?"
Archived from groups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet (More info?)
If everything was on Google - there would be no need for questions
here.
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 23:35:54 -0800, Dr. Anton T. Squeegee
<SpammersAreVermin@dev.null> wrote:
>In article <5b8021hsb36eaq6ogqpl1qo9b4enq05lie@4ax.com>,
>ken.roberts@adelphia.net says...
>
>> Here is what I know, so far - please fill in the missing ones -
>> thanks:
>>
>> Layer 7 -
>> Layer 6 -
>> Layer 5 - Message? (not sure)
>> Layer 4 - Segment (TCP)
>> Layer 3 - Packet or Datagram (IP)
>> Layer 2 - Frame (Frame Relay) or Cell (ATM)
>> Layer 1 - Frame (T-carrier 193-bit frames for example)
>
> Google is your friend.
>
> There's also the local library.
Archived from groups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet (More info?)
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:08:09 -0500, Ken
<ken.roberts@adelphia.net> wrote:
>If everything was on Google - there would be no need for questions
>here.
Everything _is_ on Google :-)
This just goes to show that formulating the right question is a
greater art than finding the answer :-)
And to the poster:
No, there is no real reason why they choose 7 for the number of
layers. It took them 7 years to get there. That's the closest to
an answer I have ever seen. They could have choosen almost any
number.
The forte of OSI is, that they showed the networking community
that it is smart to slice the problem. And that it works best if
everyone agrees on the boundries between the different functions.
>On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 23:35:54 -0800, Dr. Anton T. Squeegee
><SpammersAreVermin@dev.null> wrote:
>
>>In article <5b8021hsb36eaq6ogqpl1qo9b4enq05lie@4ax.com>,
>>ken.roberts@adelphia.net says...
>>
>>> Here is what I know, so far - please fill in the missing ones -
>>> thanks:
>>>
>>> Layer 7 -
>>> Layer 6 -
>>> Layer 5 - Message? (not sure)
>>> Layer 4 - Segment (TCP)
>>> Layer 3 - Packet or Datagram (IP)
>>> Layer 2 - Frame (Frame Relay) or Cell (ATM)
>>> Layer 1 - Frame (T-carrier 193-bit frames for example)
>>
>> Google is your friend.
>>
>> There's also the local library.
>
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.