Archived from groups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet (More info?)
In article <EbyXd.5311$cN6.1337@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
Andy Ball <null@not.valid> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been thinking about 10base2 for the last couple of
> days. Does a repeater count as a node on each of the
> segments that it's attached to?
>
The standard doesn't use the term "node". There is a limit of 30
transceivers on each segment. A repeater requires a transceiver on each
segment to which it attaches, and counts towards that limit of 30 on
each one.
--
Rich Seifert Networks and Communications Consulting
21885 Bear Creek Way
(408) 395-5700 Los Gatos, CA 95033
(408) 228-0803 FAX
Archived from groups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet (More info?)
Hello Rich,
RHS> There was a minimum spacing requirement (transceiver-
> to-transceiver) of 0.5 m, but that was it. There was
> no preferred cable length.
Thanks for the clarification. Perhaps it's more of an issue
with the broadband variants (none of which I have tried).
RHS> There is a limit of 30 transceivers on each segment.
> A repeater requires a transceiver on each segment to
> which it attaches, and counts towards that limit of
> 30 on each one.
Explained like that, it makes sense. I had read that 10base2
was limited to 30 nodes per segment and that had sparked
some debate locally about what constitutes a 'node'. Since
it's really a 30 /transceiver/ limit, I don't have to wait
for the jury to reach a decision on that one :-)
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.