Right now I'm buying Seagate.
Out of the 16 Maxtor drives I've used in the past 6 years, I've seen 10 fail out of warranty, and 2 fail in warranty. Many failed in under 2 years. That was enough for me to stop buying Maxtor. I have 4x250 in a RAID 0+1 array, one 250GB on my DVR, and one 300GB SATA drive that just got back from RMA sitting on my shelf.
Out of the 8 Western Digital drives I've used over the past 3-4 years (including my 74GB Raptor), only 1 failed out of warranty but 2 others began reporting SMART errors and I decided to replace them before they failed (puny 40GB drives anyway). They'd probably be usable but they are sitting on my shelf- should probably just toss them to free space for my collection of Coke bottles from foreign countries. :lol:
Also, I did RMA my Raptor recently after I broke the SATA connector, but that's another story. :roll:
Out of the 3 Seagate drives I've put in use, none have failed, but it's too small a sample for now. Two of those drives are 160GB in a RAID 1 holding my domain controller's boot partition which have been in use over 3 years. The third drive is a 750GB which I bought a couple months ago. (Technically I have a fourth drive- a 100GB Seagate Momentus in my laptop, which has been fine since March.)
5+ years ago, I had used 3 IBM Deskstar drives; every one failed within 1 year. They built up a negative reputation pretty fast across many forums. Hitachi may have improved things, but I haven't tried a Deathstar recently.
Still, it'd crack me up if Fry's claims that they've had more WD returns yet they carry Maxtor, which I will never buy again (I am assuming Seagate will not let Maxtor's poor quality seep over into their drive line). Maybe more Maxtors don't get returned, but they definitely don't last.
So claims of outsized returns indicate to me that maybe more WD drives are bad out the chute, but I also don't assume that indicates the drives are of lower overall quality or will have a higher failure rate over time. It might... or it might not.