Archived from groups: microsoft.public.pocketpc (More info?)
I currently experience an annoying probelm when syncing my PPC at work and
at home. If there is a calendar entry that has a work contact as an
attendee then the sync fails at home since I don't have the full set of
work contacts on my home pc. Does anyone know if this is fixed in 3.8?
Thanks,
John
--
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
RPA - Raggio Pocket PC Applications
www.theraggios.com/rpa ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.pocketpc (More info?)
"rpadev" <rpadev@nospam.optonline.net> wrote in message
news:RwHGd.7300$PE1.2315@fe10.lga...
> I currently experience an annoying probelm when syncing my PPC at work and
> at home. If there is a calendar entry that has a work contact as an
> attendee then the sync fails at home since I don't have the full set of
> work contacts on my home pc. Does anyone know if this is fixed in 3.8?
No, it's not fixed as I'm having the same issue with ActiveSync 3.8 at work
and home.
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.pocketpc (More info?)
"Sitruc" <sitruc@127.0.0.1> wrote in
news:eG4SbjL$EHA.3596@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl:
> "rpadev" <rpadev@nospam.optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:RwHGd.7300$PE1.2315@fe10.lga...
>> I currently experience an annoying probelm when syncing my PPC at
>> work and at home. If there is a calendar entry that has a work
>> contact as an attendee then the sync fails at home since I don't have
>> the full set of work contacts on my home pc. Does anyone know if
>> this is fixed in 3.8?
>
> No, it's not fixed as I'm having the same issue with ActiveSync 3.8 at
> work and home.
>
Thanks for the reply. I really hate that behavior. It seems like
something that could be fixed pretty easily, but who knows. It also
seems like a common use of the PPC. I think many users sync their work
and home PCs. Oh well.
--
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
RPA - Raggio Pocket PC Applications
www.theraggios.com/rpa ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.