China Launches its Own GPS

Status
Not open for further replies.
G

Guest

Guest
umm...so we can track all the communist dissidents through cell phones etc
 

mman74

Distinguished
Mar 22, 2006
403
0
18,790
There is no need for another competing GPS for civilian use. This is clearly for use by it's military, which requires more accurate positioning than the US are willing to release.
 

acadia11

Distinguished
Jan 31, 2010
899
0
18,980
[citation][nom]euanteouhtnaeuohn[/nom]umm...so we can track all the communist dissidents through cell phones etc[/citation]

Clearly you are clueless about the way the world is going. You think the government sees it's own people as the issue, LOL!?! Those days are past and done buddy.
 

mman74

Distinguished
Mar 22, 2006
403
0
18,790
[citation][nom]acadia11[/nom]Ahhh ... so Josh Whedon was right. First a carrier and now satellites?[/citation]

Who's Josh Whedon?
 

fearless1333

Honorable
Jun 25, 2012
62
0
10,660
How can you people blame/talk badly on China for coming up with a GPS competitor? Yes it's for military use mainly but it's the logical step forward. America would do the same thing in China's place.
 

fearless1333

Honorable
Jun 25, 2012
62
0
10,660
How can you people blame/talk badly on China for coming up with a GPS competitor? Yes it's for military use mainly but it's the logical step forward. America would do the same thing in China's place.
 

spockv

Honorable
Dec 30, 2012
1
0
10,510
There would be no need for a 2nd GPS system if human being could work together instead of against each other. There is a clear reason for everyone to have one's own GPS system. More will come (N. Korea, Japan, Iran, Black, White, Yellow, Coconut, Bananas, Christian, Muslim, Gay....). Competition is good for consumers. There is no need to be scared.
 
G

Guest

Guest
This is just one of GPS, GLONASS, QZSS, GALILEO, WAAS, EGNOS and finally COMPASS. It's only 3 meter accuracy because thats the limit of un augmented GNSS positions. However, using a base station, you can use any civilian GPS signal to give you 3cm accuracy.

This system is obviously for military independence, however, it provides benefits to civilians by increasing the SV signals and lowering things such as PDOP and initialisation times.
 

shahrooz

Distinguished
Jul 1, 2009
311
0
18,790
[citation][nom]spockv[/nom]There would be no need for a 2nd GPS system if human being could work together instead of against each other. There is a clear reason for everyone to have one's own GPS system. More will come (N. Korea, Japan, Iran, Black, White, Yellow, Coconut, Bananas, Christian, Muslim, Gay....). Competition is good for consumers. There is no need to be scared.[/citation]
as far as I know it's the 4th system not the 2nd.
 

digiex

Distinguished
Aug 26, 2009
834
0
18,990
This is more of a propaganda, China is trying so hard to surpass the US technologically, even to the extent of shortcuts like industrial espionage, technology company acquisitions.
 

fuzzion

Distinguished
Feb 4, 2012
468
0
18,780
[citation][nom]digiex[/nom]This is more of a propaganda, China is trying so hard to surpass the US technologically, even to the extent of shortcuts like industrial espionage, technology company acquisitions.[/citation]

Bingo. Did you know China has the world largest cyber warfare team ever assembled?

WW3 wouldnt be nukes. It will a cyber warfare with EMP bombs that already exist.
 

kellybean

Honorable
Nov 11, 2012
114
0
10,680
They are getting ready for war, this is so when they take our our GPS they still have one to use against us. Never trust a commie or a liberal, basically the same thing.
 
Wow, thats a lot of scare-mongering in the comments.
Why not that this is just a completely innocent revenue source for the Chinese government? As the world becomes more globalized there will be a greater need for communication infrastructure and China has decided to get in on it.
True that its first use was for military purposes, so was the Internet and half the electronics you use today.
 

rantoc

Distinguished
Dec 17, 2009
1,859
1
19,780
[citation][nom]kellybean[/nom]They are getting ready for war, this is so when they take our our GPS they still have one to use against us. Never trust a commie or a liberal, basically the same thing.[/citation]

It is the next logical step, sides turned US would have done exactly the same thing. Ensuring the supply of the service rather than have it from someone else who have an off switch...
 

rantoc

Distinguished
Dec 17, 2009
1,859
1
19,780
[citation][nom]manofchalk[/nom]Wow, thats a lot of scare-mongering in the comments.Why not that this is just a completely innocent revenue source for the Chinese government? As the world becomes more globalized there will be a greater need for communication infrastructure and China has decided to get in on it. True that its first use was for military purposes, so was the Internet and half the electronics you use today.[/citation]

Actually the internet was originally born between University networks and that made the first backbone from which it then expanded.
 
[citation][nom]rantoc[/nom]Actually the internet was originally born between University networks and that made the first backbone from which it then expanded.[/citation]

Usenet never would have worked without Chapel Hill (though I'll give the Dookies a little credit).

:)


 

dvo

Distinguished
Jan 16, 2008
90
0
18,660
i dont understand why people keep saying there is no need for another GPS system. GPS is american, Glonass is russian and now china has their own. what would happen if GPS was the only one and war broke out? suddenly the americans would be the only ones with a positioning system. what if glonass was the only one? then russia would have the only system during war. these are obviously developed for military use as their primary function. the chinese or the russians aren't going to be too pleased simply relying on some one else's GPS because if relations did go sour then it wouldn't be hard to just block them out from using it. no one is gonna let the enemy use their own positioning system against them. when china develops a system like this, civilian use is the least of their concerns.
 

freggo

Distinguished
Nov 22, 2008
2,019
0
19,780
[citation][nom]groveborn[/nom]Imagine if a device went ahead and used more than one system. Maybe we can do better than 10 meters.[/citation]

We can already do much better than 10m and there are devices that can utilize more than one system.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.