First off im not a gamer, I may play an occasional game once in a blue moon so im not really interested in gaming performance. I do alot of multimedia stuff(pics, music, videos) as well as some CAD stuff for work. My setup right now is as follows:
AMD x2 4400 @ 2.6ghz
2gigs OCZ Gold
74gig WD Raptor system drive
300gig WD storage drive
ATI AIW 800xl
Creative XF-I Extreme Music
24in Dell LCD monitor
This system was pretty high end when I built it a year or so ago, but now it seems like its outdates with the release of AM2 and Conroe. My main question is, will an entry level Conroe(6400) system give me big performance advantage over my current system?? Or will it really be a small upgrade?? If I do descide to upgrade is it worth spending the extra money for he 6600 to get the extra cache? It seems the benchmarks and reveiws available on the web are for the higher end Conroe chips, i wonder how a 6300/6400 would compare to the 4000X2? Thanks
AMD x2 4400 @ 2.6ghz
2gigs OCZ Gold
74gig WD Raptor system drive
300gig WD storage drive
ATI AIW 800xl
Creative XF-I Extreme Music
24in Dell LCD monitor
This system was pretty high end when I built it a year or so ago, but now it seems like its outdates with the release of AM2 and Conroe. My main question is, will an entry level Conroe(6400) system give me big performance advantage over my current system?? Or will it really be a small upgrade?? If I do descide to upgrade is it worth spending the extra money for he 6600 to get the extra cache? It seems the benchmarks and reveiws available on the web are for the higher end Conroe chips, i wonder how a 6300/6400 would compare to the 4000X2? Thanks