You are going to need a
PCIe U320 SCSI RAID card if you plan to RAID.
Most findable and cheapest so far is
LSI MegaRAID SCSI 320-2E.
You're going to have to fork out at least $250 for one on eBay(brand new) otherwise it's over $500 retail.
Its going into my desktop and was planning to put the windows installl and games only on these drives.
Ok raid might be out of the question as its a bit pricey
I think an 80 pin connector might be an SCA which is used for hot swap trays - here is some pictures:
http://www.scsita.org/aboutscsi/Pictures.html
You also mentioned an adapter, does it have a breakout for power? hot swap connectors have data & power so your adapter would need to address that.
As far as the PCI card goes, Adaptec is probably the most widely used brand.
yea they are like the one in the pic "New SCA 80-pin"
the adapter to 68 pin does have the molex connector.
this brings me to another question i just found 2 more 36gig ibm 10k rpm drives, that have 68 pin connectors , i asssume from your question that this 68 pins need a powerplug plugged in to work? (i know it sound like a stupid question)
Power connector is on every 80->68pin converter. Quite logically really and wouldn't exist without one.
Adaptec doesn't make any PCIe parallel SCSI cards.
LSI has been in the SCSI bussiness a lot longer than Adaptec and only makes hardware solution for enterprise. No kiddie playing host stuff.
So whats the difference from pcie and pci and parallel? I assume that pcie has better data throuput?
Thanks everyone for the help and speed responses , shedding some light on it for me.
Don't count out Ebay... I bought a U160 LSI MegaRAID card with 32MB cache there for $25. Runs my dual 36GB 10K cheetahs pretty well (I added some cache- 128MB SDRAM DIMM), noisy though- you know those drives are enterprise class right? silence is not really a requirement when they design them. ESPECIALLY the 80pin SCA drives. The FDB does help though.
BTW, you don't really need U320 for two drives. Even at 10k, they'll max out around 150-160 MB/s which is pretty cliose to the limit of the controller. And PCI should be able to handle that.