G
Guest
Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.need-for-speed (More info?)
Question: am I the only one for whom High Stakes is very, very dark, no
matter how high I set my system's gamma & brightness from the control panel?
(ie, those have no effect; graphics card is a 32MB ATI Rage 6/Radeon 7200,
by the way, and the rest of my system's an 800MHz VIA C3/Ezra with 128MB
RAM, not that it matters)
http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~aa343/nfs-hs-shade.jpg - the first tree-canopied
area in Celtic Ruins, as an example; gamma's at 2.00 here. The screen
shot's a bit brighter, actually, than what I see in-game: the tree trunk on
the right side, as a benchmark, is dark enough to be completely invisible!
http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~aa343/nfs-hs-shade2.jpg - same screenshot, just
with a bit of fiddling in Irfanview to up the gamma well beyond what I can
get in-game to what, I hear, is pretty much how everyone else sees it...
For comparison, http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~aa43/nfs-hp-shade.jpg (deep in
the Lost Canyons) and http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~aa343/nfs-hp-shade.jpg
(under an overhang in Aquatica) are pretty much the darkest shaded areas I
can find in Hot Pursuit - with system gamma left at its default levels
instead of jacked up as for the High Stakes shot.
[in every aspect, on my box, Hot Pursuit looks many times better than High
Stakes, though I'm told it should be the other way around... For an example
of how bad High Stakes looks normally, here's the starting line of
the Celtic Ruins: http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~aa343/nfs-hs-shade3.jpg ]
--
"...there are hardly any excesses of the most crazed psychopath that cannot
easily be duplicated by a normal, kindly family man who just comes into
work every day and has a job to do." [Terry Pratchett, "Small Gods"]
http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~aa343/index.html
Question: am I the only one for whom High Stakes is very, very dark, no
matter how high I set my system's gamma & brightness from the control panel?
(ie, those have no effect; graphics card is a 32MB ATI Rage 6/Radeon 7200,
by the way, and the rest of my system's an 800MHz VIA C3/Ezra with 128MB
RAM, not that it matters)
http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~aa343/nfs-hs-shade.jpg - the first tree-canopied
area in Celtic Ruins, as an example; gamma's at 2.00 here. The screen
shot's a bit brighter, actually, than what I see in-game: the tree trunk on
the right side, as a benchmark, is dark enough to be completely invisible!
http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~aa343/nfs-hs-shade2.jpg - same screenshot, just
with a bit of fiddling in Irfanview to up the gamma well beyond what I can
get in-game to what, I hear, is pretty much how everyone else sees it...
For comparison, http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~aa43/nfs-hp-shade.jpg (deep in
the Lost Canyons) and http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~aa343/nfs-hp-shade.jpg
(under an overhang in Aquatica) are pretty much the darkest shaded areas I
can find in Hot Pursuit - with system gamma left at its default levels
instead of jacked up as for the High Stakes shot.
[in every aspect, on my box, Hot Pursuit looks many times better than High
Stakes, though I'm told it should be the other way around... For an example
of how bad High Stakes looks normally, here's the starting line of
the Celtic Ruins: http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~aa343/nfs-hs-shade3.jpg ]
--
"...there are hardly any excesses of the most crazed psychopath that cannot
easily be duplicated by a normal, kindly family man who just comes into
work every day and has a job to do." [Terry Pratchett, "Small Gods"]
http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~aa343/index.html