That's the question.
Upgrade time. Which shows the best promise down the road? This would be on a 775 board for the Intel or a AM2 board for the AMD.
The E6300 is a bit faster but also costs more. Also the mobo will cost more, and if you want upgradability for quad core then you will need 975x I believe.
Id say a X2 4200-4400 is comparable to a E6300. All AM2 boards WILL support quad core next year. The choice is yours.
Supports Intel® Core™2 Duo processor, Intel® Pentium® D processor, Intel® Pentium® 4 Processor with Hyper-Threading Technology (HT Technology)†, and all other Intel® Pentium processors and Intel® Celeron® processors in the LGA775 socket, with scalability for future processor innovations.
LGA775 socket for Intel Core2 Duo, Core2 Extreme and next generation Mulit-Core CPU
Good news to consumers. Intel has changed its mind to give P965 to support the upcoming quad-core Kentsfield processors. Kentsfield is Intel’s first quad-core desktop processor for extreme users in which Intel pushed to appear no after than this year. In the original plan, 975X chipset is the only one supporting the new processors. But two weeks ago, manufacturers have received surprising news that Intel had changed its mind to give P965 a new pose.
He is right, an e6300 will perform like an x2 4200+ mostly! Overall, the AM2 system would be cheaper, mainly because of the MOBO choices. It is really a tuff decision honestly. Either the 4200 or e6300 for sure though
Really? Like a 4200+ eh?
Explain these to me? That's right.. for games and synthetic applications as well as Office applications the Core 2 Duo E6300 is on par or faster then an AMD Athlon64 X2 4600+. It's only slower and comparable to a 4200+ when doing Professional 3D rendering (2 apps).
Really? Like a 4200+ eh?
Explain these to me? That's right.. for games and synthetic applications as well as Office applications the Core 2 Duo E6300 is on par or faster then an AMD Athlon64 X2 4600+. It's only slower and comparable to a 4200+ when doing Professional 3D rendering (2 apps).
elmo ,do you waltz around the web just owning people?
the bytch was PWND
but the 3600 is a nice performer.it doesnt smoke in everything,against the core2,but it does a great job.
and you cant oc the sempron and not oc the core2 6300,what kind of bs is that?
stock vs/stock;oc vs/oc.logic is not a friend to some.
You have proven nothing, and your attempt to belittle me is just sad! I agree, the E6300 is a better CPU, but at the same price of an e6300 build, the 4200+ build is worth looking at.
rsonally id do the x2 sempron before the 4200.
like spelling?yeah it was funny. 8O :roll:
are you aware that id asked if anyone had found one for sale?or knew of the released date?nahhh that would mean you read that post.oh well :roll:
as far as your price performance assertion ill refer to elmo's posted charts.
are you aware it was also benched in gaming?and performed well?and your point has no merit?and i argue if i know things to be different from what i have read at various sites,and when i am wrong i admit it?
are you aware of this?nahhh that would mean that you have read alot of stuff :roll: :roll:
I doubt any current dual core CPU will be good enough for gaming in 3-4 years the way most people want it.An E6300 should play all games coming out in the next 3-4 years, as long as it's paired with a decent graphics card.
He is right, an e6300 will perform like an x2 4200+ mostly! Overall, the AM2 system would be cheaper, mainly because of the MOBO choices. It is really a tuff decision honestly. Either the 4200 or e6300 for sure though