http://yahoo.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?storyID=urn:newsml:reuters.com:20060927:MTFH30630_2006-09-27_03-37-43_N26231575&type=comktNews&rpc=44
http://yahoo.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?storyID=urn:newsml:reuters.com:20060927:MTFH30630_2006-09-27_03-37-43_N26231575&type=comktNews&rpc=44
AMD loses its court case against Intel?
I wonder how the "Horde" will react to this...
Hey, I can't lower my self to that level of stupidity right now... I'm in my IT class now. I need my brain the way it is.
It's been a big week for AMD and shenanigans. I wonder what we can expect from them next. Will they start spamming peoples emails telling them to buy AMD? They've already done that to our beloved 10 year old forum. (Seriously what are we going to do when Tom's turns 21?)
If you guys want a really good laugh, go see sharikapoop had to say about this.
Apparantly, they failed to follow his advice on this matter and this is what happened. I guess that sharikapoop is now some kind of legal expert too.
Sounds a lot like someone else I know.
If you guys want a really good laugh, go see sharikapoop had to say about this.
Apparantly, they failed to follow his advice on this matter and this is what happened. I guess that sharikapoop is now some kind of legal expert too.
Sounds a lot like someone else I know.
You gotta admit. Just by being a dink, this guy's name brings in 86,000 hits in Google. What's this world coming too?
If you guys want a really good laugh, go see sharikapoop had to say about this.
Apparantly, they failed to follow his advice on this matter and this is what happened. I guess that sharikapoop is now some kind of legal expert too.
Sounds a lot like someone else I know.
AMD failed to follow my advice
When Intel moved to strike part of AMD's claims on lack of subject matter jurisdiction, I suggested the following argument: Japanese PC makers such as SONY sell their finished PCes in the United States. Therefore, Intel's anti-competitive behaviour in Japan affects the US PC market and US consumers. When Intel excluded AMD from Japan's SONY, US consumers were no longer offered the choice of stylish SONY AMD PCes. Joe Osh could have bought a AMD SONY for $1000, instead he had to buy an Intel SONY for $2000. Intel's foreign anti-competitive behaviour thus have direct effect in both the foreign and domestic x86 markets. AMD's lawsuit in US seeks to address such effects in the US under US law, while AMD's lawsuit in Japan addresses the effects in Japan.
Judging from Judge Farnan's ruling, AMD failed to deliver the simple message above, instead, AMD's arguments were quite abstract.
While some Intelers are cheering, they have to understand this is just the original complaint. As AMD uncovers more evidence through discovery, it will leave to amend its complaint and may add these back in.
I don't have a JD. But I tell you, I can devise an argument to bring about a certain result with the rules and the facts. That's why I can be better than most lawyers -- liberal arts people who lack logic most of the time.
People have been seeing apples falling for millions of years, only Newton discovered gravity. Why? You can have all the facts, but you have to use them correctly...
Some info on the Judge, very fun reading.
Yeah this is what the neanderthal had to say..
Well, i guess now that AMD's lawyers didn't listen to Sharikooooo, he better revise his theory about Intel going t!ts-up. Had they listened to him, Intel (as we know it) would have been a distant memory. :roll:AMD failed to follow my advice
When Intel moved to strike part of AMD's claims on lack of subject matter jurisdiction, I suggested the following argument: Japanese PC makers such as SONY sell their finished PCes in the United States. Therefore, Intel's anti-competitive behaviour in Japan affects the US PC market and US consumers. When Intel excluded AMD from Japan's SONY, US consumers were no longer offered the choice of stylish SONY AMD PCes. Joe Osh could have bought a AMD SONY for $1000, instead he had to buy an Intel SONY for $2000. Intel's foreign anti-competitive behaviour thus have direct effect in both the foreign and domestic x86 markets. AMD's lawsuit in US seeks to address such effects in the US under US law, while AMD's lawsuit in Japan addresses the effects in Japan.
Judging from Judge Farnan's ruling, AMD failed to deliver the simple message above, instead, AMD's arguments were quite abstract.
While some Intelers are cheering, they have to understand this is just the original complaint. As AMD uncovers more evidence through discovery, it will leave to amend its complaint and may add these back in.
I don't have a JD. But I tell you, I can devise an argument to bring about a certain result with the rules and the facts. That's why I can be better than most lawyers -- liberal arts people who lack logic most of the time.
People have been seeing apples falling for millions of years, only Newton discovered gravity. Why? You can have all the facts, but you have to use them correctly...