Best vid card for 300-400 range.

SciFiMan

Distinguished
Apr 19, 2006
385
0
18,790
Sorry, we can't answer that until we know your system spec's, and how long you are planning to, or are likely too, keep your current PC. That is, will this card be the last you buy for this system, or will you replace it a year from now with a DX10 card?
 

paddy4

Distinguished
Sep 8, 2006
26
0
18,530
1900xt 512 obviously nybody that recomends nything else is clearly mentally deficient!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16814102025
 

paddy4

Distinguished
Sep 8, 2006
26
0
18,530
yes, that is a good deal. But I can't trust someone who can't type. :roll:
Well at the moment i currently own a 1900xt 512,7800GTX 512,7900GTX and a 7950GX2.I can tell you for a fact that the 1900 rapes all of them execpt the 7950GX2.
 

prozac26

Distinguished
May 9, 2005
2,808
0
20,780
Yes, you should also know that the 256mb version is exact same as the 512mb version, besides the memory. So performance is basically same, unless you keep increasing resolution.

Also, you don't need to wave that e-penis at everyone here.
 

cleeve

Illustrious
1900xt 512 obviously nybody that recomends nything else is clearly mentally deficient!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

To me, it seems that it's obvious the 256mb version is an excellent deal and performs almost as well as the 512mb version for less money... and that anyone who can't see that is mentally deficient. :p

Assuming a $100 spread, get the 256mb card. But prices always change, if the 512mb version is closer in price, it'a a good buy, too.
 

paddy4

Distinguished
Sep 8, 2006
26
0
18,530
Yes, you should also know that the 256mb version is exact same as the 512mb version, besides the memory. So performance is basically same, unless you keep increasing resolution.

Also, you don't need to wave that e-penis at everyone here.
The 512mb version offers severaly benifits including the obvious 1 of being able to use 512mb textures(you can also use this on the 256mb version but puts atlot more strain on the mem)also differnt memory is used in 512mb versions which can usually hit 900mhz!.The 512mb version is worth it,especially if theres only like 100 dollars in the differnce!
 

paddy4

Distinguished
Sep 8, 2006
26
0
18,530
Games that run on the doom3 engine(eg doom3 quake4 and prey)use over 500mb of vram on ultra quality.Oblivion also use over 500mb along with GRAW,F.E.A.R. and plenty of other games!also its the fact that they use over 256mb of vram is whats important not that they dont use over 500
 

paddy4

Distinguished
Sep 8, 2006
26
0
18,530
From the benches im looking at its bout 5-10 frames slower than the 512mb 1900xt in games(that use 512mb textures).the gap between the 256 1900xt and 512 1900xt become more apparent as the AA and resolutions increase.
d31600.gif
 

paddy4

Distinguished
Sep 8, 2006
26
0
18,530
That bench mark clearly shows that games running on the doom3 engine use over 500mbs(well atleast over 256) of vram.since the vram is the only variable between the two cards nd the 512 mb card scores higher.i will also screenshot something for you in 2mins
 

paddy4

Distinguished
Sep 8, 2006
26
0
18,530
are you sure about that. how much video memory did that 7900 have. was that a 512 mb version.

you have to understand that proves nothing as the 256 and the 512 x1900 have slightly different clocks as well IIRC. perhaps it is memory but until you can provide proof( no not some bloody chart) i won't belive you and you make yourself look like a noob.

please give me the links which say all the games you mentioned use that much memory.

i do not want pics. i want YOU to provide the links to articles.
http://www.pureoverclock.com/article33-4.html
 

TRENDING THREADS