Response to turpit:
Re: "Support for AMD 754 and 939 to go away soon."
I agree, however, AMD has tended to support an older socket type longer in the past, so it is reasonable to hope that they will support AM2 for quite a while. As for AM3 and other future CPU's.... Intel will do the same. Sooner or later you have to buy a new mobo for the new CPU, but with Intel, it tends to be sooner.
Re: "the expensive Core 2 mobo myth" You may have noticed I said "with similar features" when referring to mobos. The decision to go AMD was because the cost of the mobo plus CPU allowed me to spend more on my other components.
As for the "fanboy" comment... Who really gives a crap what brand your computer is. Most of us want the best computer that does what we want it to do, while staying within our budget. Different folks will have different needs, and will have different component availability. Also, after you have assembled your computer, installed all the software, and logged onto Toms Hardware forums to brag about how great it is... another, better processor, and mobo, etc. will be reviewed, and you will start to plan the next one.....
I did not mean to imply
you were a fanboy, and if that is the way the comment seemed, I appologize, however, it did appear as if you may have been a victim of the FUD being spread by the fanboys who are looking to belittle Intels recent success in any way they can.
As for buying a computer, timing is always key. As such, if someone needs a new system right now, logically their choices are pretty much pre-determined. Note, I said logically as this is where fanboy mentality aserts itself. I have built myself a new system about every 18-24 months and for the past 6 years I have been using AMD as they provided the best level of performance per unit of currency expended. Intel's new Core 2 coupled with AMDs recent inability to deliver its high end products reliably (X2 5000/5200) has changed that, at least for the moment. Whether AMD can regain its performance and price/perfromance lead remains to be seen, but for the time being, for some one to build a new system:
- as cheaply as possible, AMD is the way to go.
- best performing system Intel
- best performance/unit of currency expended, Intel
My appologizes: THG hasent upgraded this chart recently as prices have (for the time being) stabilized somewhat.
If you pull the older Pentium Ds and EEs out of the chart, its shifts to favor Intel even more.
As for socket support, Intel has stated that socket 775 will support its upcomming quad cores, so it appears as if 775 is going to continue being supported for quite some time.
On the AMD side, with AM2, they are in the same boat they have been for in years. As with socket A, they will continue to support socket AM2, however, as with socket A, if you have an older mobo, you will need to upgrade to a newer mobo with a current chipset to make use of AM3.
Just as before, having a socket A mobo that could accept a A1900XP didnt mean it could support the A3200XP. It only meant the chip would fit in the socket. So, again, there is a strong possability that any one who buys a current AM2 mobo planning on upgrading to a AM3 CPU is likely to have to buy a new mobo when AM3 hits the streets. Regardless of the fact that it will be due to need to move to a updated chipset. Since chipsets cannot curently be removed/replaced to upgrade, you must buy the whole motherboard. It was an older fanboy excuse that ...its not the mother board, its the chipset.... A net sum zero argument as the money spent= a new mobo.
As for "comparable features" on the mobo, again, the cost of the better RAM offsets the cost of the mobo. If you are not seeking to obtain the maximum performance from your system, then cheaper ram (at least from a known manufacturer) will suffice with AMD. If you want to make full use of your systems potential, you will have to buy the better (more expensive) ram, thus negatining any savings you may have seen by buying a cheaper mobo. This falls in to the catagory of "the cheapest system possible". However, for someone who is planning to purchase a system for video editing, I dont think they would be willing to give up that much processing speed to save $50, of course that is an assumption on my part for this specific case and could vary well be wrong.