Regarding the Asus P5W-DH Deluxe:
However, we could not convince our test sample to run at the overclocked 333 MHz system speed (FSB1333), which shouldn't be hard to reach these days. The system kept crashing after few seconds.
I'm running mine currently at 360x9 (3.24) with an E6600. This board rocks, it's very stable. (Could the authors problem be bios? At least get the test boards bios up to 1305, if not 1407...)
Regarding storage:
Also, we would have preferred to change the RAID settings for the Silicon Image secondary storage controller in software rather then setting an old-fashioned jumper.
It's not a
storage controller in that sense....i mean it is just a device designed for hardware raid on external and internal boxes(ones that are os independent and use just one sata cable). As such it just goes to the missing sata port from the intel controller....but i guess they could have used a chip(ic of some kind) to set it....but in a bios reset...that may cause bad things....i like that the jumper setting will stay no matter what...
...
Actually, I think there is some confusion there...
This is my understanding of the numerous SATA setup on the board.
--The JMicron controller is the eSATA, as well as a single internal controller, most likely you won't use this.
--The SII controller hosts the EZBackup chipset. This is what is being referred to regarding being set by jumper. By default, it does software Raid1, but can be configured to do Raid0 by setting the jumper, and changing a bios setting to re-read the jumper setting.
I would also note, that during a Windoze install, when using the EZBackup ports, the drive just shows up as a single drive with no storage controller driver required from floppy.
--Intel Matrix controller. The default port(s) for single drive, or Raid5.
Now for the interesting part. I'm curious as to the Raid0 configuration that was used during the testing! From the article, reference is made to changing the jumper, which I assume is for using the SII (EZBackup) Raid option.
My setup is Raid0 as well. I ran some basic benchmarks for R, W, and SyncR/W on the SII (EZBackup), as well as Intel controllers both in Raid0.
Findings: Intel controller smoked the EZBackup controllers in performance.
I'm surprised I haven't seen this posted anywhere, as the default config for Raid0 (as per manual...), is the SII (EZBackup) controller (changing jumper and bios setting for Raid0)... But the performance gain of taking the time to configure software raid, and load your OS using the storage driver required to use the intel ports is very worth the time and effort.
Would love to see the test results reflect this configuration..
Thanks,
-John
**Edit: Bleh, added what board I'm referring to!