I'm playing CS: Source and my fps is around 20-30 fps, which is pretty crappy, but I'm surprised my integrated video card could even run CS: Source.
Anyway, I'm upgrading and I wasn't sure how important pixel pipelines + memory interface are compared to core and memory speed.
And since I'm low on the dough right now, is the performance increase in the 7300 GT and GS worth the 15 extra dollars over the 6600 ? I mean, if it's going to get me 15-20 extra fps, then that's all good, but if it's just like 5-10, then I don't want to spend that extra money.
You should go for pixel pipelines and memory interface. Frequency can always be added later by overclocking. The first card you linked to is very nice. I would guess it would outperform the 6600, but not sure of how to prove it. The specs on the two are close, with the 7300GT having higher frequencies. An extra 15-20FPS? That depends on the res you play at. (might be 20% faster.)
So would the extra 15 bucks be worth it if I were to buy the 7300 GT instead of the 6600?
I mean, they're both the same except the 7300 has a higher clock speed and GDDR2 instead of DDR.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.