Ad
News

Brittanica objects to study claiming equal accuracy with Wikipedia

Published on March 24, 2006

From BBC News Online Read more

Enermax Readies Modular 1000 W Power Supply

Published on June 08, 2006

Power supply specialist Enermax is showcasing a very special solution at Computex: Galaxy is its latest top-of-the-line 1000 W PSU. It was designed to power the most sophisticated computer systems. Read more

VIDEO: Intel Talks About Skulltrail

Published on February 21, 2008

At this year's Game Developers Conference in San Francisco, we interviewed Intel's Senior Performance Analyst Francois Piednoel about their dual processor Skulltrail platform. He told us the monstrous systems aren't just for extreme gaming, but also easily handle rendering and video production tasks. Read more

Seagate Responds to Freezing HDDs

Published on November 10, 2008

Last week Toms had covered a bit about the freezing problems with Seagate’s Barracuda 1.5TB drives. We would like to update readers with the response that Toms has gotten directly from Seagate. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

System Builder Marathon: $625 Gaming PC

Published on November 26, 2008

This month's System Builder Marathon is all about your feedback to us. We've revamped our entry-level and mid-range PCs with new price points. Let's kick things off with what we think is the best value at a $625 price point! Read more

The State Of The Personal Computer

Published on November 25, 2008

Where were we in 2008 and where are we heading in 2009? In his State of the Personal Computer address, Alan Dang shares his insights as a user of three different platforms: Mac, Windows, and Linux. Read more

Tom’s Winter 2008 Hard Drive Guide

Published on November 24, 2008

Flash-based drives take the performance segment by storm, but the good old hard drive still provides the best bang for the buck as capacities reach 1.5 terabytes. We scanned all the available offerings and found the best drives for winter 2008. Read more

Efficiency: Core 2 Nukes Atom On The Desktop

Published on November 21, 2008

Atom is geared for low-cost, low-power netbooks and nettops, while the device is a poor choice for desktop PC applications. We show you why Core 2 is better, and give some guidance on how to pick the best power supply for your low-power application. Read more

 

please reply asap




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : please reply asap
 
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

hi all
i am going to buy a laptop. i have two in my mind, asus a8js and asus a8jp. asus a8js has nvidia go 7700 vga card, while asus a8jp has Ati mobility radeon x1700. i wanted to ask u which vga card is better because apart from this, nearly everything is same. so the bottom line is that which vga card is better ati's mobility x1700 or the nvidia's go 7700. please reply soon. thanks.

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

I couldnt find much info on the X1700 because its new or not out yet.

But its abt the exact same as the Go 7700, except that the Go 7700 has an 80nm core. Its the first card on earth with an 80nm core. This means that it can overclock much higher, but since its a laptop and u cant really overclock very high inside that small of a case, the 80nm core is wasted.

Sine they both have pretty much the same core, if not the exact same, all that matters are the clock speeds, wich u can overclock, so they dont really matter either.

http://www.gpureview.com/GeForce-Go-7700-card-457.html

Just my two frames' worth.
Profile: Graphic Gorilla
More Information

One of the few extensive benchmarks out there, but still in the early stages;

http://nb.intozgc.com/098/98741.html

Use a language tool if you wanna read the review.

The GO7700 outperforms the X1700, thanks in part to 4 more shader units than the plain GO7600 (which was even with the X1600), it's essentially a 80nm refresh of the rare and almost exclusive Sony GO7600GT which was a 12 shader unit part, unlike the plain 8 unit GF7600.

Profile: Honorary Master of THGC
More Information

Who is the new king of Mobile Display

20 years ago, when Toshiba invented the world's first notebook, we dare to imagine that people now have a notebook with the powerful functions. With technological advances and the application of the increasingly widespread, originally belong to commercial users of notebook toward family entertainment and multimedia applications developed rapidly, with notes of playing the latest 3D games role is no longer really expect things as mobile computing in 2006 entered the field of two nuclear era, the entertainment notebook effectiveness has reached an unprecedented height.

Currently, the domestic notebook computer market segmentation has become clear that some of the game with a strong performance in the notebook computer has become the new darling of the people, they can become a game notebook, which has an emotional tie with a powerful graphics processing unit is essential. Go current mobile processing consists of a series of nVIDIA and ATI Mobility Radeon series of two camps, Intel released two Rui cool, nVIDIA and ATI have also launched the latest mobile processor chip nVIDIA GeForce Go7700 and the ATI Mobility Radeon X1700. In addition to further enhance performance, the chip now to the notebook power consumption and heat and have more stringent requirements, the high and low scores does not mean that one is outstanding, today we have two shows this chip in a notebook and overall performance evaluation do something contrast, a better look at who is the "strongest game of the plane" in 1915.

Just my two frames' worth.
Profile: Graphic Gorilla
More Information

Dude, you're wrong on so many levels. 8O

G7700 is totally different than the X1700, and the 80nm is not wasted it helps make the chip cheaper, and without issue it makes the chip potentially run cooler and more efficiently.

The X1650P was to market as 80nm before the GO7700 was.

And the X1700 it's already selling too, which is probably why the OP asked.

As for performance, you're wrong there too, as the GO7700 outperforms the X1700 in most tasks.

Just my two frames' worth.
Profile: Graphic Gorilla
More Information

Quote :

Who is the new king of Mobile Display



IMO nV's got the edge in the high end, and they've just taken the middle away from the X1600 (which was faster than a desktop pro, but slower than an XT, and was only slightly[very slightly] better than the plain GO7600, but below the rare GT). Now the GO7700 makes their 12 shader solution the standard.

The MRX1700 is a dissapointment many of us were expecting an X1650XT type of chip, not just a strained X1600 refresh. :evil:

Profile: Forum Fixture
More Information

Quote :

Dude, you're wrong on so many levels.


Every post he makes is like that :roll:

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

Quote :



G7700 is totally different than the X1700, and the 80nm is not wasted it helps make the chip cheaper, and without issue it makes the chip potentially run cooler and more efficiently.



Being cheaper to make dosent mean much for the consumer.
Its cooler because the clocks are lower.

Quote :


The X1650P was to market as 80nm before the GO7700 was.



There is no card called X1650P, maybe u mean the X1650 Pro, wich has a 90nm core.
http://www.gpureview.com/Radeon-X1 [...] d-447.html

Quote :


And the X1700 it's already selling too, which is probably why the OP asked.



Alright, i didnt know if it was or not, as i could not find much information abt it.

Quote :


As for performance, you're wrong there too, as the GO7700 outperforms the X1700 in most tasks.



I cant prove u wrong, but can u prove me wrong?
They have the same core, so if u say that the 7700 is better, then that means that the X1700's clocks are lower.


I hope ive answered all of ur questions.
Chris

*Smacks turpit with a +15 ban stick*
Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

Its also cooler because the smaller transistors require less voltage, and less voltage exponentially (probably not quite but I like that word, it makes me sound smart :wink: ) reduces heat output.

Just my two frames' worth.
Profile: Graphic Gorilla
More Information

Quote :


Being cheaper to make dosent mean much for the consumer.
Its cooler because the clocks are lower.



Being cheaper to producee translates into a lower minimum cost, and therefore a reduction in prices. That's why desktops and laptops cost a fraction of what they used to 'reduced costs', so you're wrong.

As for cooler because of lower clocks, the GO7600 and GO7700 have the same clocks, only the GT has higher speeds.

Quote :


The X1650P was to market as 80nm before the GO7700 was.



Quote :

There is no card called X1650P, maybe u mean the X1650 Pro, wich has a 90nm core.



So you want to defend your error with questioning the acronym, WEAK!

Oh and BTW I see your lame review and raise you one with an actual view of the chip;

http://www.elitebastards.com/cms/i [...] mitstart=1

"Finally, here's the RV535 core that powers the Radeon X1650 PRO in all its naked glory. You can see the effect on die size by the transition to 80nm here - RV530, which powers Radeon X1600 boards, is 150mm², compared to the 130mm² die on show here."

There are may out there that are left over X1600XTs, but also those that are true RV535s / X1650Ps or X1650 Pro to you. :roll:


Quote :


As for performance, you're wrong there too, as the GO7700 outperforms the X1700 in most tasks.



I cant prove u wrong, but can u prove me wrong?[/quote]

Yeah READ the FAQin review I posted just up above, dumbA$$!

Quote :

They have the same core, so if u say that the 7700 is better, then that means that the X1700's clocks are lower.



Where do you get the idea they have the same core?

They are completely different cores, as for speeds the standard X1700 is clocked higher (no word on a GO7700GT) which doesn't make up for the fewer ROPs which favours the GO 7700 architecture. Of course if they were the same core there would be no difference, and there are many (ROPs, Texture Units, and FP support to list a few)

They are very different, just like the GF7600 and X1600 desktop parts are totally different.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

then the bottom line is that nvidia go 7700 is much better than ati mobility radeon x1700. now do any of u know when will Asus a8js will be launched? and if u can, can u please find a link where it is sold cuase i cant find any currently. thanks.

Profile: journeyman
More Information

Quote :

then the bottom line is that nvidia go 7700 is much better than ati mobility radeon x1700.



Depends on what yo're using it for, but yes for gaming GO7700>MRX1700.

MRX1700 has more features, but for most people they won't be as important.

Quote :

now do any of u know when will Asus a8js will be launched? and if u can, can u please find a link where it is sold cuase i cant find any currently. thanks.



Yeah I haven't seen the S recently only the P.

However check out NotebookReviews.com their forums usually have alot of good info about the latest stuff. I joined an convo about the P a few weeks ago by request, and noticed they have a good selection of people with new laptops out there, quite a global reader base and thus good access to products upon launch.

Check there, there's a few people who've gottent their hands on them so you'd have to find out how/where. I haven't seen them locally, but I'm waiting until after Xmas to buy.

Just my two frames' worth.
Profile: Graphic Gorilla
More Information

Quote :



......




HEhe I found a gltch in the forum Software. :twisted:



Go to:
 

Google Ads