Because if u overclock then it will be better. Its not fair to judge cards wich have different clock speeds. You comments arent very smart..
You're statement is spurious at best. You just want to defend your favoured card, but all your arguments work both ways.
You compare STOCK speeds, because not all cards OC the same, and my ability to OC might be better than yours. Your argument falls apart also because the X1650Pro is now also 80nm and the GF7300GT is still only 90nm, and thus the OC potentials favour the X1650 on design alone. But hey based on your argument I say the X1300XT OC'ed to 5GHZ is the best overall. :roll:
I dont think even you urself know what the hell that means.
Texture heavy? Without texture mapping there would be no game.
And without pixels there'd be no games, and without ROPs,, and without vertex/geometry engines....
However tell me the last game to have the texel load be so much heavier than the pixel load under default. Games now are far more pixel bound than texture bound.
What? at the same clock speeds the 7300 GT is better.
Only in older titles, not in the latest titles, only if he's sticking to older games would it be a worthy competitor.
Please listen to me, save each of us time.
Listen to you? Why bother, you've been talking out the side of you left butt cheek ever since you said the X1700 and GF7700 had the same core. :roll: