I just purchased a new computer from an online retailer (name given on request) - those numnutz decided to install 2 A-Data DDR2 PC6400 800MHz 512MB memory (http://www.adata.com.tw/adata_en/product_detail.php?ProductNo=AD2800U) into my Asus P5N-SLI nForce 570 SLI mainboard (http://www.asus.com/products4.aspx?l1=3&l2=11&l3=331&model=1311&modelmenu=1) in dual-channel mode.
I was noticing that the computer was locking up frequently, so I gave the online retailer a call. Their tech support folks recommended that I jack up my DRAM voltage from "default" (which I think is 1.8V) to 2.1V. This seems to stabilize my system and it no longer locks up. However, I'm still concerned - the A-Data site (linked above) specifies a voltage of 1.8+/-0.1V to be used with the memory. The mainboard specification doesn't seem to mention 800MHz DDR2 memory as being supported - it mentions Dual-channel DDR2 667/533.
So, it appears that the memory is too fast for the hardware to handle, which might be how it's getting buggered up and locking my computer. The voltage thing seems to be balancing it out (possibly by making the memory less efficient?).
So, my question to you is - is it really okay to go 0.3V over the specified load (0.2V above "max") for the memory for long-term 24/7 computer usage (99% of the time with a pegged CPU)? Am I effectively overclocking my system and RAM by using 800MHz RAM (in other words, is what I've done at their behest a good thing)? Can this system be overclocked any further, or would that be asking for trouble? Should I get the computer manufacturer for false advertisement (they have "4 x DIMM, max. 16GB, DDR2 800 / 667 / 533, non-ECC, un-buffered memoryDual channel memory architecture" on the part specification for the motherboard) and have them upgrade me to an ASUS board that really can take DDR2 800 MHz - free of charge of course?
P.S. I can't seem to post to this forum from that computer. It keeps telling me to enable cookies, which I'm sure are. I have the default XP firewall in place though.
P.P.S. I posted this to the general hardware forum earlier, but it turns out that's more a CPU forum, and not a memory/motherboard forum. So I'll remove that post now if I can. Sorry, I'm a n00b
I was noticing that the computer was locking up frequently, so I gave the online retailer a call. Their tech support folks recommended that I jack up my DRAM voltage from "default" (which I think is 1.8V) to 2.1V. This seems to stabilize my system and it no longer locks up. However, I'm still concerned - the A-Data site (linked above) specifies a voltage of 1.8+/-0.1V to be used with the memory. The mainboard specification doesn't seem to mention 800MHz DDR2 memory as being supported - it mentions Dual-channel DDR2 667/533.
So, it appears that the memory is too fast for the hardware to handle, which might be how it's getting buggered up and locking my computer. The voltage thing seems to be balancing it out (possibly by making the memory less efficient?).
So, my question to you is - is it really okay to go 0.3V over the specified load (0.2V above "max") for the memory for long-term 24/7 computer usage (99% of the time with a pegged CPU)? Am I effectively overclocking my system and RAM by using 800MHz RAM (in other words, is what I've done at their behest a good thing)? Can this system be overclocked any further, or would that be asking for trouble? Should I get the computer manufacturer for false advertisement (they have "4 x DIMM, max. 16GB, DDR2 800 / 667 / 533, non-ECC, un-buffered memoryDual channel memory architecture" on the part specification for the motherboard) and have them upgrade me to an ASUS board that really can take DDR2 800 MHz - free of charge of course?
P.S. I can't seem to post to this forum from that computer. It keeps telling me to enable cookies, which I'm sure are. I have the default XP firewall in place though.
P.P.S. I posted this to the general hardware forum earlier, but it turns out that's more a CPU forum, and not a memory/motherboard forum. So I'll remove that post now if I can. Sorry, I'm a n00b