Obviously DX10 and Vista why buy a DX10 card if your not gonna use DX10! Also Vista is gonna have a new 9.0 called 9.0L(L stands for Longhorn) which will vastly improve performance in 9.0 apps.
Obviously DX10 and Vista why buy a DX10 card if your not gonna use DX10! Also Vista is gonna have a new 9.0 called 9.0L(L stands for Longhorn) which will vastly improve performance in 9.0 apps.
Are you sure the Vista will have DX9.0L? I thought that Vista will ship with DX10 (therefore there is no need for DX9.0L), and DX9.0L will be made available for Windows XP.
Obviously DX10 and Vista why buy a DX10 card if your not gonna use DX10! Also Vista is gonna have a new 9.0 called 9.0L(L stands for Longhorn) which will vastly improve performance in 9.0 apps.
Just because a card is labeled DX10 doesn't mean its pointless to get it if you're only going to run DX9, all the new DX10 cards are going to be much more powerful and provide some good performance in graphic intensive games like Oblivion that needs atleast two cards to run at high res with full eye candy...
what your failing to understanad is that with dx10 there is a new generation of a cards which means a big performance increase...just cause its dx10 it doesn't really make the card an amazing card that just includes what will look like better graphics for us, but as far as raw power that is just the card/hardware not the dx10...
so its just like going from a 6600GT to a 7900GT, if there were no such thing as dx10 people would still be getting the new 8800GTX, so why just because you won't be utilizing one part of the puzzle would you avoid getting a new generation card, cause in reality thats what your getting, consider the dx10 more of a bonus
Obviously DX10 and Vista why buy a DX10 card if your not gonna use DX10! Also Vista is gonna have a new 9.0 called 9.0L(L stands for Longhorn) which will vastly improve performance in 9.0 apps.
Just because a card is labeled DX10 doesn't mean its pointless to get it if you're only going to run DX9, all the new DX10 cards are going to be much more powerful and provide some good performance in graphic intensive games like Oblivion that needs atleast two cards to run at high res with full eye candy...
what your failing to understanad is that with dx10 there is a new generation of a cards which means a big performance increase...just cause its dx10 it doesn't really make the card an amazing card that just includes what will look like better graphics for us, but as far as raw power that is just the card/hardware not the dx10...
so its just like going from a 6600GT to a 7900GT, if there were no such thing as dx10 people would still be getting the new 8800GTX, so why just because you won't be utilizing one part of the puzzle would you avoid getting a new generation card, cause in reality thats what your getting, consider the dx10 more of a bonus
I have to agree with Xazax310, The point of buying a DX10 card is the DX10 ability...
Think about the time...not far off, and DX9 cards will still be plenty. That is why DX10 cards will be sought after for their DX10 abilities.
I undestand and no one is failing to understand the performance increase in DX9, but the cards are being sold for their novelty, and not just as a necessary hardware upgrade.
I undestand and no one is failing to understand the performance increase in DX9, but the cards are being sold for their novelty, and not just as a necessary hardware upgrade.
Are you sure the Vista will have DX9.0L? I thought that Vista will ship with DX10 (therefore there is no need for DX9.0L), and DX9.0L will be made available for Windows XP.
While DX10s will be backword compatible DX10 isn't. That's why Vista will have DX9.0L to support older games.
This was a comment on an article at DailyTech (http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=4630)
"Haha, I know whats going on. SP3 is the patch that puts DX10 in [XP]. They're just going to wait a year later to screw over about 10 million people or so, and THEN release the service pack."
Get Vista and DX10 card. You know why? Cause eventually you will have no choice. At the moment there is the Microsoft monopol on the market so you have to install whatever (crap) they produce.
This was a comment on an article at DailyTech (http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=4630)
"Haha, I know whats going on. SP3 is the patch that puts DX10 in [XP]. They're just going to wait a year later to screw over about 10 million people or so, and THEN release the service pack."
Anybody else hear about anything like that?
i doubt they'll integrate dx10 into XP, that is vista's selling point and i see how that it wouldn't matter at that point since it would be so late into vista's introduction but if microsoft did that lots of people would be pissed if they had already switched to vista
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.