science standard in news

th is competent in computer and electronics, but if you want to write about physics you should be a bit more accurate. The latest article about "light computing" reads as if this technique is actually implemented, except that it isn't, it's just another proposal in a long list drafter in the last years.

this is like putting in the news about a new graphic card that could render videos in seconds, except then you read on and slowly realize that the card doesn't exist, that only a couple of chips have been fabricated that could possibly eventually in future lead to etc.

I posted a "talkback" comment under the article but it was deleted. I would have sent an email to the author instead of the comment but there was no email link.