Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (
More info?)
"Jack Zwick" <jzwick3@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:jzwick3-6914FF.14025723112004@news1.east.earthlink.net...
> In article <MPG.1c0d4e9ad470c24798981c@news.dallas.sbcglobal.net>,
> Jud Hardcastle <l5i5changethistodash5rbo@xemaps.removethis.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <jzwick3-5F7AA3.12583823112004@news1.east.earthlink.net>,
> > jzwick3@mindspring.com says...
> > > So i get the USPS FANCY LETTER today, on heavy stock like a wedding
> > > announcement. Must cost 10's of millions of dollars to mail out to
every
> > > Cingular / ATTWS. It announces the merger. They must have thought it
was
> > > actually going to happen on Nov. 15
> > >
> > > In fine print on the bottom, it says go to
www.cingular.com to see
> > > coverage map. Too bad there's no decent map on line.
> > >
> > The maps are still online. Go to Customer Service - Getting Started -
> > Area Maps. As for decent....
> >
> > Cingular's "official" coverage isn't going to be much different on the
> > map before or after ATTWS is merged because the maps show ALL licensed
> > areas by ALL partners, whether the partners actually have GSM service,
> > or ANY service, there or not. Therefore the only new areas would be
> > where ATTWS had service but where Cingular didn't have a roaming partner
> > at all either ATTWS or someone else--probably very few if any such
> > areas. Cingular DID pick up GSM coverage due to ATTWS sites but you
> > can't identify it on these best-case maps.
>
> Put more succinctly, the maps grossly fail to meet the standard of the
> Consumer Code Cingular claims to abide by.
Please provide a link to the minimum technical requirements for these maps
as required by the CITA Consumer Code. If one is not available, then please
explain how something can not meet a standard that doesn't exist.