Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.scanner (
More info?)
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 19:16:15 GMT, David Causier
<davidcausier@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>No, despite its $$$ cost it doesn't. And the problem I described
>occurs with Kodak and Fuji film.
>
If you are using NikonScan try turning the color management *off* and
see what you get. You might need to play with the monitor profile
as well. Also there is a bit you can do in the "Advanced" settings
with the color channel gain to create a custom setting.
These things *sometimes* are plug and play, but most often require a
lot of work to get the monitor, and printer to agree.
One question, does your monitor faithfully reproduce the colors from
the slide and from the print or is there a difference.
Generally you end up needing to create a profile for the scanner and
for the monitor. If the monitor is reasonably close for the scanned
prints but not the scanned slides, then you need to create a custom
profile, or profiles for the scanner.
IF you have a number of film types for slides and for negatives but
the results are off for all negatives and slides, then you most likely
will need to create a profile for each type.
Have you tried using VueScan? It works well for me.
OTOH you have control of virtually everything in VueScan so it has a
much steeper learning curve than Nikon Scan. Nikon Scan has some nice
features that make it easy to use.
In my case using a Nikon LS5000-ED I did not have to create a custom
scanner profile, or haven't so far and I think I've gone through near
20,000 slides and negatives so far since last March. I've lost track
of just how many so my numbers may be off a tad either way.
Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com
>On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 09:26:30 -0800, J. A. Mc. <jaSPAMc@gbr.online.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 08:31:56 GMT, David Causier
>><davidcausier@worldnet.att.net> found these unused words floating about:
>>
>>>From a roll of film developed and printed by a local processor, I've
>>>noticed that my HP4C can duplicate the print nearly exactly, whereas
>>>scanning the negative of the same picture with my Nikon 4000 rarely
>>>matches the print quality, although the detail is usually sharper. The
>>>same applies when I scan slides-the scanned image is never of the
>>>quality of the projected slide. The problem seems to be somewhere in
>>>color management in the Nikon. I'm getting ready to batch scan several
>>>hundred slides, and obvioulsy don't want to have to tweak each one.
>>>Any suggestions? Thank you.
>>
>>Both my Microtek & Minolta have film 'brand' settings that can be tweaked
>>and saved as 'profiles'. Doesn't the Nikon for its greater $$$ have this?