I've found a research paper comparing the response time of the various LCD display technologies (see source info below).
The paper clearly outlines the advantages and disadvantges of TN, MVA and IPS with respect to grey turn on and off response. The paper says:
"In TN and MVA devices, on-time response including all
grey scales is widely spread in a range of 4..60ms, that is,
the ratio (R) of slowest to fastest response is about 10
but the IPS case is about 2.2 For off response time,
the R values are almost same among three devices, not
very large though the absolute value of the IPS device is
relatively small."
From the measurement results in the paper (its a 3d chart which is a bit hard to read due to bad picture quality)
my conclusion is the following:
grey response time:
IPS is the best
TN is medium and
MVA is worst!
With respect to white-black response (and this data is the only one specified in the response time of LCD monitors ):
IPS & MVA better than TN
The summary of the cited paper is:
"In image quality viewpoint, 2-domain IPS and FFS devices seems best and are comparable to the CRT display though still needs further in color reproduction and low contrast ratio in dark environment."
The additional LC mode which is mentioned in the paper called 'FFS' (=fringe field switching)has similiar good properties like IPS and seems a bit faster. It is already in massproduction (Hunday Display).
I've found the specs of a FFS-panel which has a response time of 20ms (this is of course only the black-white response). You can find the panel data here:
http://www.hydis.com/product/monitor/p_view.asp?p_id=3
The weak point of this panel is the small viewing angle. This is due to the fact that it is only single domain. A dual domain version called 'Ultra-FFS' with a better viewieng angle is already announced:
http://www.hydis.com/technology/ffs_tech/ffs_future.shtml
It seems that the paper I've found confirms the test results, that MVA panels are not so good for 'gaming'. However, it is not clear to me right now if all VA-technologies (thats MVA,PVA,VA-IPS according to that paper) are in the same boat when it comes to response time (but it seems so).
If one is looking for shortest possible response time one has to look for FFS panels. A monitor which such kind of panel is available in May:
http://www.chip.de/news_stories/news_stories_8718454.html
But it has a small viewing angle.
The next best choice are dual domain IPS monitors, such as EIZO L565.
I'll review all monitor reviews again, to find out if there is a tendency that IPS LCD-Monitors are indeed better.
source:
"Liquid Crystal Displays with High Image Quality and Fast Response Time"
S. H. Lee and M-H. Lee
Department of Polymer Science and Technology, Chonbuk National University, Chonju 561-756
Journal of the Korean Physical Society, Vol. 39, December 2001, pp. S42-S48
(Received 1 November 2000, in final form 12 September 2001)
<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by blexxun on 04/14/02 07:21 AM.</EM></FONT></P>
The paper clearly outlines the advantages and disadvantges of TN, MVA and IPS with respect to grey turn on and off response. The paper says:
"In TN and MVA devices, on-time response including all
grey scales is widely spread in a range of 4..60ms, that is,
the ratio (R) of slowest to fastest response is about 10
but the IPS case is about 2.2 For off response time,
the R values are almost same among three devices, not
very large though the absolute value of the IPS device is
relatively small."
From the measurement results in the paper (its a 3d chart which is a bit hard to read due to bad picture quality)
my conclusion is the following:
grey response time:
IPS is the best
TN is medium and
MVA is worst!
With respect to white-black response (and this data is the only one specified in the response time of LCD monitors ):
IPS & MVA better than TN
The summary of the cited paper is:
"In image quality viewpoint, 2-domain IPS and FFS devices seems best and are comparable to the CRT display though still needs further in color reproduction and low contrast ratio in dark environment."
The additional LC mode which is mentioned in the paper called 'FFS' (=fringe field switching)has similiar good properties like IPS and seems a bit faster. It is already in massproduction (Hunday Display).
I've found the specs of a FFS-panel which has a response time of 20ms (this is of course only the black-white response). You can find the panel data here:
http://www.hydis.com/product/monitor/p_view.asp?p_id=3
The weak point of this panel is the small viewing angle. This is due to the fact that it is only single domain. A dual domain version called 'Ultra-FFS' with a better viewieng angle is already announced:
http://www.hydis.com/technology/ffs_tech/ffs_future.shtml
It seems that the paper I've found confirms the test results, that MVA panels are not so good for 'gaming'. However, it is not clear to me right now if all VA-technologies (thats MVA,PVA,VA-IPS according to that paper) are in the same boat when it comes to response time (but it seems so).
If one is looking for shortest possible response time one has to look for FFS panels. A monitor which such kind of panel is available in May:
http://www.chip.de/news_stories/news_stories_8718454.html
But it has a small viewing angle.
The next best choice are dual domain IPS monitors, such as EIZO L565.
I'll review all monitor reviews again, to find out if there is a tendency that IPS LCD-Monitors are indeed better.
source:
"Liquid Crystal Displays with High Image Quality and Fast Response Time"
S. H. Lee and M-H. Lee
Department of Polymer Science and Technology, Chonbuk National University, Chonju 561-756
Journal of the Korean Physical Society, Vol. 39, December 2001, pp. S42-S48
(Received 1 November 2000, in final form 12 September 2001)
<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by blexxun on 04/14/02 07:21 AM.</EM></FONT></P>