Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > C2D - speed question

C2D - speed question

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs - C2D - speed question

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

I OC'd my proc to 3ghz and am NOT running any games or hard core apps to really test it out, but should I see an increase in load times for my programs like Firefox, Quicken, etc? Should I see an increase in boot times? If I am not seeing any major increases in these basic things is this normal or is my system compromised somehow?

Thanks!!

Eddie

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
- 0 +

it is normal, if your talking about general responsiveness(app load times, small file compression/decompression, ect) , CPU's haven't been the bottleneck in that area since around the era of the PIII's. rather if you want more responsiveness, adequate ram (IE more then 512MB of DDR or better), and hard drives with fast seek times, and burst speeds, and high overall throughputs, are what will make your computer seem more responsive. if you really want to see the difference get PCmark, and run it at both stock and your overclock. but just a really good overclock, generally wont net you any noticeable improvements in responsiveness.

Reply to almerac

Quote :

I OC'd my proc to 3ghz and am NOT running any games or hard core apps to really test it out, but should I see an increase in load times for my programs like Firefox, Quicken, etc? Should I see an increase in boot times? If I am not seeing any major increases in these basic things is this normal or is my system compromised somehow?

Thanks!!

Eddie



I believe you mean a decrease in load times.

Hell if faster CPUs means increased load times, then I'll ditch my E6600 and go back to my Pentium MMX 166MHz.

Reply to jaguarskx

Increase, decrease...you know what I mean! :oops: :P

Reply to mickeddie

If you want faster load times, then you should look at a fast hard drive like the WD Raptor series.

I'm not an expert, but I would say that the best drive to get for data transfer would be good 'ole SCSI.

Some people say:
SCSI = Voodoo

Reply to jaguarskx
- 0 +

A faster CPU at that level doesn't necessary mean faster load times in Firefox, etc. A browser will be limited by your net connection. Loading programs may depend on your hard drive speed and cache......I think this is what you are referring to: "load times".

The CPU will REALLY make a difference in 2 major respects:

1) it will run Windows and other background processes without breaking a sweat and you'll notice how Windows runs smoother, especially when running other applications (ie--Multitasking);

2) in CPU-intensive applications, your "crunching" times will improve dramatically......DVD encoding, pic rendering, whatever. Anything basically other than games....those improvements will be nominal.

Reply to skyguy

Like all of the above.

Like jaguar said, put 2 raptor in raid0 and you will see an improvement, probably not worth the money but I guess you system is already pretty fast for all of your task.

Just look at the light of HDD activity / listen to them.Look at the CPU usage . and you'll see its the HD working hard.

I do also like OO Defrag, best defrager on the market IMO and this should help keep load time/boot time constant even after a while

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > C2D - speed question
Go to:

There are 1254 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them