G
Guest
Guest
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.scanner (More info?)
I'm in need of some advice. I have about 3500 slides of my late
fathers that span from the 1950's to the 1990's. I want to digitize
these for safekeeping. I own an HP S20 but after scanning a couple
hundred slides, I find it is rather slow and the resolution and colour
depth are not as high as newer units.
I've been looking for comments regarding the Epson 4870 versus the
Canon 9950F and the Nikon Coolscan 5000 with the slide feeder. I want
a reasonable balance between speed, resolution, and quality. I like
the Canon because it will do 12 slides at a time, but I understand
that the images may not seem as crisp as the Nikon. Obviously, it is
also a third the cost.....but can I compensate with software
sharpening? I also have read that with the dust removal software
running, it is considerably faster than the Epson.
I would appreciate peoples comments, good or bad, on any of the above
scanners.
Thanks,
FRP
I'm in need of some advice. I have about 3500 slides of my late
fathers that span from the 1950's to the 1990's. I want to digitize
these for safekeeping. I own an HP S20 but after scanning a couple
hundred slides, I find it is rather slow and the resolution and colour
depth are not as high as newer units.
I've been looking for comments regarding the Epson 4870 versus the
Canon 9950F and the Nikon Coolscan 5000 with the slide feeder. I want
a reasonable balance between speed, resolution, and quality. I like
the Canon because it will do 12 slides at a time, but I understand
that the images may not seem as crisp as the Nikon. Obviously, it is
also a third the cost.....but can I compensate with software
sharpening? I also have read that with the dust removal software
running, it is considerably faster than the Epson.
I would appreciate peoples comments, good or bad, on any of the above
scanners.
Thanks,
FRP