My primary motivation is so I can play Oblivion and other high end games. Other than that, websurfing but possibly for media related things, like setting up a 'Tivo' box and burning DVDs.
I'd like the system to be as quiet as possible without watercooling with another PCI slot or more.
I'll be running Windows XP Home, and probably won't upgrade to Vista for at least several months after release.
My concerns:
The vid card is a silent pipe II and the mobo north/south bridges are not actively cooled. I was hoping the Aurora case had enough good air flow that it wouldn't be an issue, but everyone says the Northbridge runs very hot on the motherboard and I didn't know if overclocking the 805D would exacerbate this.
My dilemma/options:
1) system as listed above - if there aren't any issues with it.
2) Intel 805D with a different mobo that would allow overclocking, but be "forward compatible" if I upgrade to a CD2 processor - and maybe Windows Vista - next year. Any motherboard reccomendations, under/around $150ish?
3) as above, except with a different mobo and a CD2 processor now. I basically put the system above together a few months ago. The motherboard and 805D will run me about $200, and I plan on overclocking it. However, if I can get a good mobo and CD2 for $400ish - that would be significantly better than OCing the 805D - I'd likely do that. Recommendations?
I'm leaning towards option #2, but haven't researched any motherboards lately. I'm somewhat flexible on component prices and don't mind spending a bit more but I'm talking $20 here, $50 there. Not $400+ for a processor or anything like that. Basically, I tried to stick to an average of $100-$150 for all the base components - except the 2G of ram.
If anyone, 'altruists' or others, could give me some thoughts I'd greatly appreciate it. I've not done much research on the Core Duo processors so I don't know how they compare to an over-clocked 805D, value wise.
don't know how they compare to an over-clocked 805D, value wise.
I couldnt find any head-to-head reviews of the OC'd 805D and any C2D. But if you check the THG Article 805D OC'd to 4.1Ghz you'll see that the 805D OC'd peformed very similar to the P4 EE 3.73Ghz Prescott.
And you can use the THG CPU chart to compare the stock CD2's with the P4 EE 3.73Ghz. It looked to me that the E6400 held around 20-30% advantage at stock speed.
THG CPU Chart P4 EE 3.73 Prescott vs C2D E6400
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.