My New E6400 Posting at 3519 on stock v core. - Page 2

Rephrase:
And DaSickNinja is a much better Ocer then you so refer to the above.

This guy oced the hell out of his x6800 pulling 4.32ghz stable.

Anyways, I completely agree with what you said.

me too!! :twisted:

me too!! :twisted:

Me three

To OP: I don't understand why it is so hard to just go download a few programs and get some screenshots to help prove your vcore....

Although I agree RobsX2 would have an incredible chip on his hands, it may not be impossible. Here's an E6400 running at 1.32v that hits 3.4gHz:



http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=106321&page=2

And here's a 6400 running at 3.4gHz @ 1.29v:



http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=106321&page=3

Keep in mind that these guys benched their overclocks with SuperPi. Rob didn't do that; all he said was he could boot to windows with it @ 3.5.

I can vouch for Rob not getting on here and intentionally BS'ng because I personally know him. It's possible the Asus board he has is just making some kind of auto voltage adjustment. Rob, can you take a pic of your bios voltage screen with your dig camera and post it? Or just take a pic of your desktop w/ Asus Probe running in the background? I think it reads voltages right. That would put this issue to bed.

I think the reason you're catching so much flack is because this would be one of the best overclocks anybody's seen yet, but that's a good thing if you can prove it. :-)

20 bucks says Rob changed his name to XionX2... come on RobsX2 -> XionX2... so obvious!  

J/K

I may be Blind, but i dont see a vcore in anything other than CPUZ..Which we have said atleast 30 times this thread, is very inaccurate with higher vcores.




Again you test my vision! That looks like a 6300.

OCnewb, are you intentionally just trying to be a prick, or does it just come naturally.

From what I've seen, when CPU-Z is not reading correctly (i.e. - when voltages are set to 1.5v or higher) it will read 1.213v. As you can see, it doesn't read 1.213 in any of those screenshots I posted. And if you'll click the damn link that I provided you with, you'll see plenty of guys on that thread that list their voltages along with their overclocks.

And believe me, there aren't a lot of bullsh!t artists on xtremesystems. Most of those guys know what they're doing. They don't fake overclocks and voltage readings just to boost their egos. Several individuals over there write for PC-tech magazines and design their own water-cooling/phase change systems with their names slapped on them.

Run an IP check, if you wish. Two different guys, but acquaintances. I told Rob to post a desktop pic of Asus probe running in the background with voltage readings to get all of you off his back.

Only mods can run IP checks. Don't believe me? Tell me what my IP, DNS, gateway and subnet address I have.

Yeps this is completely normal. These C2D's around has been proven to be great overclockers, and a lot of them are actually running below stock (1.325V) Vcore. I'm personally running a E6300 at 3.4GHz at 1.30V, and you'd be surprised if I said I'm actually running on stock cooling.  

^ Ninja, thanks for your brillilant insight, but I'm acutely aware that common forum members can't run IP checks on each other. I wasn't born yesterday. I was basically giving anyone the freedom who has connections w/ mods here to run an IP check on me. That's what I was saying.

What is the average age level here, 14? Is it recess time yet? Milk and cookies, then nap?

Now would you naysayers please GFO and get a life? :roll:

Nice, Rob! I imagine we'll probably hear crickets chirping after this. From the level of immaturity I've witnessed on this forum so far, I doubt a lot of these guys will have the courtesy or balls to come back and apologize for ripping you before.

That chip of yours is a monster.

Whats that sound I hear?

http://www.puresilence.org/

Congrats! Thats is great vcore for that FSB. It took u three pages of posts to do it, but still very nice. Next time simply post that as well and you prolly woulda got 2 or 3 responces.

As for apologizing.For what? We asked for proof, and he prooved it. Grats on your first lesson in tech forum posting.

Indeed.

If you and your cohorts hadn't been so rude to him in the first place, maybe he would've posted it sooner. But no, you and your own personal Jihad here decided to throw stones instead of doing your own research into what the 6400 is truly capable of.

Pretty n00bish if you ask me, so your username is quite fitting.

If you and your cohorts hadn't been so rude to him in the first place, maybe he would've posted it sooner. But no, you and your own personal Jihad here decided to throw stones instead of doing your own research into what the 6400 is truly capable of.

Pretty n00bish if you ask me, so your username is quite fitting.

Eh, it would appear I have insulted your lover. For that I apologize. The only "noobish" act ive seen is your friend coming here, claiming something taht has been done ..twice? and showing no proof what so ever. If asking for proof makes me a noob, then i pray to god u never get put on trial my friend.

How original.



Are you blind? His proof was in his first post where he gave you a CPU-Z screenshot. The only way you and your buddies should've called bull sh!t right away is if it's impossible for an E6400 to reach 3.5gHz under 1.5v--the point at which CPU-Z starts to read voltages incorrectly--which it's clearly not, if you've done your research. There are plenty of guys running those speeds at 1.4v or under.

As I said, fitting username you have because you obviously hadn't done your research on the matter.

If you and your cohorts hadn't been so rude to him in the first place, maybe he would've posted it sooner. But no, you and your own personal Jihad here decided to throw stones instead of doing your own research into what the 6400 is truly capable of.

Pretty n00bish if you ask me, so your username is quite fitting.

Eh, it would appear I have insulted your lover. For that I apologize. The only "noobish" act ive seen is your friend coming here, claiming something taht has been done ..twice? and showing no proof what so ever. If asking for proof makes me a noob, then i pray to god u never get put on trial my friend.

Well honestly I thought my CPU Z pic was proof enough on its on but I guess I should have known better. I never realized there would be so many immature pricks here running off at the mouth telling me that I dont know what I am doing and what not :roll:

Next time I will be sure to have a blood, urin, semen, and stool sample prepared so I can prove myself!!!! :roll:


Fact is I proved the idiots wrong that called me out so this discussion is over and I have officially owned all the naysayers.

There is no way that is possible. I say you have been photoshopping the last few pages of this thread. And now that your done with photoshoping it u posted the pics.

ROTFLMFAO!      

I knew it was just a matter of time and it couldnt come from a bigger prick.      

And btw I do happen to have both a life and a wife so I cannot spend every waking hour on this thread like some of you nerds without a life or a wife.  

Post it on the first post next time, so we can believe you right away.

You must admit, even though you turned out to be right, if you looked at it from the perspective of the forums veterans who posted, who by the way don't know you, you would see that you didn't provide enough information to be considered proof.

It's a known fact that CPU-Z doesn't give accurate voltage readings. It's also known that it's easy to falsify a screenshot with a photo editing application.

It only took you until the 3rd page to verify your results with a picture of your BIOS taken from a camera, when it's really very simple to do that. You could have done it in your first post, even, without anyone asking you to. Then, they might have been more inclined to believe you.

Fact is, you brought this on yourself by holding out on the information.

To all: A CPU-Z screenshot on your desktop does not count as all the evidence you need.

Post it on the first post next time, so we can believe you right away.

You must admit, even though you turned out to be right, if you looked at it from the perspective of the forums veterans who posted, who by the way don't know you, you would see that you didn't provide enough information to be considered proof.

It's a known fact that CPU-Z doesn't give accurate voltage readings. It's also known that it's easy to falsify a screenshot with a photo editing application.

It only took you until the 3rd page to verify your results with a picture of your BIOS taken from a camera, when it's really very simple to do that. You could have done it in your first post, even, without anyone asking you to. Then, they might have been more inclined to believe you.

Fact is, you brought this on yourself by holding out on the information.

To all: A CPU-Z screenshot on your desktop does not count as all the evidence you need.

Read my post before yours, Like I told you I have other things in my life besides tomshardware.com :roll:

Post it on the first post next time, so we can believe you right away.

You must admit, even though you turned out to be right, if you looked at it from the perspective of the forums veterans who posted, who by the way don't know you, you would see that you didn't provide enough information to be considered proof.

It's a known fact that CPU-Z doesn't give accurate voltage readings. It's also known that it's easy to falsify a screenshot with a photo editing application.

It only took you until the 3rd page to verify your results with a picture of your BIOS taken from a camera, when it's really very simple to do that. You could have done it in your first post, even, without anyone asking you to. Then, they might have been more inclined to believe you.

Fact is, you brought this on yourself by holding out on the information.

To all: A CPU-Z screenshot on your desktop does not count as all the evidence you need.

And also I guess I never realized that there were people pathetic enough to go to such great lengths to make there e penis look bigger :roll:

next time i will be sure to proved at least 5 forms of proof right from the start :roll:

I joined in May you joined in August thats 3 months before you and yet you have twice the post count and your saying I spend all my time on here? Oh and I'm not old enough to get married I just started high school.

8O . o O (what happened to this thread?)

Did some of you guys wake up on the wrong side of the bed today or something?

I'd say it is a impressive OC, but like I mentioned before, I'd be more impressed if it was a stable OC (3519mhz@1.2 vcore) with Prime95.

As far as CPU-Z being accurate, from my point of view, perhaps it just the chipset or super I/O.

I mean for my system, with the bios set to 1.50, my vcore is jumping all over the place. CPU-Z says 1.584 atm. And when I run Prime95, it does stablize to 1.50, but still drops to 1.47 then 1.57.

Also, not all software will poll at the same intervals. So if you have software that polls 3-5 secs, your not going to see fluctuations.

I joined in May you joined in August thats 3 months before you and yet you have twice the post count and your saying I spend all my time on here? Oh and I'm not old enough to get married I just started high school. In just a few more minutes I"m going to post a screen shot of my overclock to 3.5 ghz. And it will look just as believable as yours.

Big effin deal? I post alot when I am here because I typically share info or try to help others. Hell at least I contribute instead of being a complete cock like some of the naysayers such as yourself who are just here to mouth off even after the proof that was asked for was posted :roll:

Im so Fukin sorry for not posting it all on the first Page :roll: and im so fukin sorry that I had to eat dinner and spend some time with my wife before I could come back and post the other pics :roll:

Guy seriously go fuk your damn self. Go photo edit your pic and try to show everyone that you think thats what I did :roll:

Well hell so would I but I never claimed it to be P95 stable. I only stated this was my max OC at stock VC that would get me to post to windows.

And I have proven my point.

LMAO! So now some newbie high-schooler is going to accuse you of photoshopping that pic of your bios and Asus Probe?

Oh, this is just too damn much. You guys are a riot!

Look all you newbies, go HERE:

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=106321

... and you will see plenty of guys who are getting some crazy overclocks on this chip. Now granted Rob's is about the best I've seen so far, but his benchmarks are in the same ballpark as plenty of guys who own this chip.

There are plenty of 6400's that are running very, very close to his. For gods sake, I even posted an E6300 that was running close to his (3.4gHz) at 1.3v, and it starts out at a measly clock of 1.8. That's a 1600mhz overclock on an increased voltage of less than half a tenth.

I wonder how many PC's Mr. newbie high-schooler has built from the ground up like you and I have Rob? Better watch out--don't want he and his water-colors to show you up.  

Now I know why Tom's Hardware benchmarks are always a laugh riot (like the 1900GT that kept up with the 7950GX2 on HL2 Episode One--priceless). We have all these gurus in the forums conducting the tests.

Both sides misunderstood.

Some thought you were saying the E6400 was prime stable at that speed and stock Vcore. That would have been exceptional, but the original claim was just being able to boot into Windows. That's a far cry from passing a torture test, though you still have a good chip in your hands (or very good cooling).

CPU-Z cannot be relied upon to prove voltages in the 1.2xx range because using voltages in the 1.5xx range causes it to misreport in this 1.2xx range. There are other ambiguous ranges, too - I wouldn't expect anyone to keep track of the precise misreported values, if they exist, as relatively few people test their CPUs at these voltages.

^ Thing is, Wr, read the title of Rob's topic. It doesn't say "Prime stable on stock vcore at 3.5gHz." It says "Posting at 3519 on stock vcore."

I mean, hell, do none of the n00bs on this forum know what the word "POST" means!? Well, I guess the newbie high-schooler may not--he's still taking english classes.  

You never should have left.

You either. Now go hump your mountain dew.

Wow what a retarded thread. Why not just post some real proof in the first place. The exact reason for posting proof in the first place is so that threads like this don't happen.

Sighhhhhhhhhhhh :roll: :roll: :roll:

I generally make it a point not to bicker with those obviously less intelligent than I, but I think here I should make an exception.

Before you accuse someone of humping leaving English classes too early, remember that "Mountain Dew" is a proper noun, and therefore deserves to be capitalized.

Now that both of us have proven your obvious ineptitude at passing as gifted with intelligence, I go to a Liberal Arts college, originally as an English Major, coming in with 6 credits from High School in a University-level English course. This let me skip the rudimentary English courses and get into the more advanced Logical and Persuasive writing courses.

Now that we have taken care of that, I have a girlfriend, who in fact bears no resemblance to my hand (except in that she has two of her own) nor a soda can in any color.

If you have any other ways in which you can be proven as an utter asshat, please share them now. Or perhaps we should make a separate thread on it.

Threads like this wouldn't "happen" if there weren't so many retarded high school kids here that loved to jump on anybody for whatever reason due to their insecure selves. The guy posted a screenshot of CPU-Z reading the exact voltage he stated he was running at in his very first post. And anybody with some sense or computer knowledge in general would've given him the chance to offer more proof before casting stones.

Anybody with a lick of common sense knows it isn't necessary to feed 1.5v to the 6400, thus subjecting CPU-Z's reading to error, to get it to 3.5gHz. But therein lies the problem. This forum is filled with pious n00bs who think they know everything, when the reality is that they don't know jack sh!t.

I generally make it a point not to bicker with those obviously less intelligent than I, but I think here I should make an exception.

Before you accuse someone of humping leaving English classes too early, remember that "Mountain Dew" is a proper noun, and therefore deserves to be capitalized.

Now that both of us have proven your obvious ineptitude at passing as gifted with intelligence, I go to a Liberal Arts college, originally as an English Major, coming in with 6 credits from High School in a University-level English course. This let me skip the rudimentary English courses and get into the more advanced Logical and Persuasive writing courses.

Now that we have taken care of that, I have a girlfriend, who in fact bears no resemblance to my hand (except in that she has two of her own) nor a soda can in any color.

If you have any other ways in which you can be proven as an utter asshat, please share them now. Or perhaps we should make a separate thread on it.

Thanks for the long dissertation. Now let me ask you something.

Tell me how you passed all of your English courses when you have such piss-poor reading comprehension?

The only individual I made a reference to in not completing his/her English classes was the high school kid above. You, on the other hand, are the person opening yourself up to all sorts of jabs by posting an emoticon of a guy humping a Mountain Dew can. So don't cry if someone decides to take the obvious crack at it.

Capeche?

There. Was that better, professor? I can buy that you were a Liberal Arts major, because you obviously don't know shit about computers.

Sighhhhhhhhhhhh :roll: :roll: :roll:

Ah you just realised what you did.
Yes CPU-Z isn't accurate.

As for you and your x2 buddy. You're the "noobs" as you like to say.

You got a nice OC, well done.
People asked you to make it more credible and you throw a tantrum.
Why don't you both just piss off to your 2 man elite crew's hide out and not bother coming back.

That's because my professors know how to both grade and teach. You obviously know how to do neither.



That must be why you quoted me...you obviously directed that at someone else. :roll:



You're very good at detecting a joke, aren't you? Quick on the uptake, I see. There's obviously two of you, because there's an X2 in your name. :roll: And thank you for finally realizing your mistake and capitalizing a proper noun.



Waaaaaaah. <-------This is me crying.



First demonstrate mastery of one language before you try to use another. It's "Capisce?" I took Spanish, not Italian, and I still knew that one.

Capisce? Capisce? There. Was that better, professor? I can buy that you were a Liberal Arts major, because you obviously don't know **** about computers.[/quote]

The key word here is "were." I do know ****, because I'm now IT, and have been since my second semester here. The same could be said about you, because all you've done so far is support your buddy "RobX2." Speaking of whom, you still haven't responded to the accusation that the two of you are actually the same person.

Sighhhhhhhhhhhh :roll: :roll: :roll:

Ah you just realised what you did.
Yes CPU-Z isn't accurate.

As for you and your x2 buddy. You're the "noobs" as you like to say.

You got a nice OC, well done.
People asked you to make it more credible and you throw a tantrum.
Why don't you both just piss off to your 2 man elite crew's hide out and not bother coming back.

Could of never said it better myself since I never finished English.

I seriously doubt that, especially since you can't remember what someone said just a few posts above you.



I didn't quote you, Hamlet. Go back and take another look.



The "X2" happens to stand for the Athlon X2 processor, which Rob and I both owned before upgrading to Core 2 Duo. But I guess we couldn't expect all of the Bill Gates' prodigies that reside on Tom's Hardware to pick up on something like that.



Well, I wouldn't want to offend your own personal blow-up doll.



Then it's obvious you still have a long way to go.



Are you calling my knowledge into question? Apparently, I'm the only one, besides Rob, who realizes that the E6400 doesn't require 1.5v to reach 3.5gHz--especially on the motherboard he is running. Anybody who knows anything about overclocking the Core 2 Duo knows that the P5 Deluxe is just about the best for that right now.

I mean, that's the reason B.S. was called in the first place, according to a # of posters here, right? Because CPU-Z's readings are inaccurate from that point on (1.5v)?



Yes I did. I gave freedom to all moderators to check the IP addresses between us. Not that I needed to do that anyway, but how do you expect me to respond to an absurd comment like that? If the dialect differences between us aren't enough, and an IP check still isn't, then what will be?

We are talking about an anonymous message board here, after all.

OK... this is a senseless flame war. Please, stop the madness! We can't actually discuss anything on the forumz these days because of aggro morons flaming the shit out of everybody!

Oh, and stop dissing Tom's Hardware, XionX2. If you think that THG is such shit, go to another forum.

You either. Now go hump your mountain dew.

Uh, yes, you did in fact quote me. There's a thing on the right side of your web browser called a scroll bar. Say it with me, "scroll bar." Use that to go up and down in web pages. Now, use it to find where you quoted me, then denied it.

I think I've had about enough of you. Go home and stay off your mommy's computer, it'll leave the Internet for people who know how to use it properly.