Leaders Pledge Restraint on Gay Bishops
By RACHEL ZOLL, AP Religion Writer
NEW ORLEANS - Episcopal leaders, pressured to roll back their support for gays to keep the world Anglican family from crumbling, affirmed Tuesday that they will "exercise restraint" in approving another gay bishop and will not authorize prayers to bless same-sex couples.
The statement mostly reiterated earlier pledges by the church, and it will not be known for some time whether the bishops went far enough to help prevent an Anglican schism.
Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori said she believed the document met the requests of Anglican leaders. But some Episcopal conservatives immediately rejected the statement as too weak, because it does not bar gays and lesbians from becoming bishops.
Bishops released the statement in the final hour of an intense six-day meeting and at a crucial moment in the decades-long Anglican debate over how the Bible should be interpreted.
The 77-million-member world Anglican Communion has been splintering since 2003, when Episcopalians consecrated the first openly gay bishop, V. Gene Robinson of New Hampshire. The Episcopal Church is the Anglican body in the U.S.
Anglican leaders had set a Sunday deadline for the Americans to pledge unequivocally not to consecrate another gay bishop or approve an official prayer service for same-sex couples.
Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams, the Anglican spiritual leader, took the unusual step of attending the meeting for the first two days, pushing bishops to make concessions for the sake of unity. Anglican lay and clergy representatives from overseas also participated, scolding Episcopal leaders for the turmoil they've caused. Williams and other Anglican leaders will evaluate the statement in the coming weeks.
Robinson said the talks with Williams and Anglican leaders were "the two hardest days since my consecration." But he said thought the document was fair.
"I think people came here thinking this was going to be Katrina II," he said. "And what in fact happened was a coming together of the bishops of the church."
However, Episcopal conservatives noted that many priests will still conduct same-gender blessing ceremonies, despite the lack of an official prayer. Critics also said the bishops aren't doing enough to provide alternative leadership for conservative dioceses.
"This is a 'try to keep your foot in the door' maneuvering effort," said Canon Kendall Harmon, a leading conservative from the Diocese of South Carolina.
Conservative Bishop John Howe of the Diocese of Central Florida said the statement wouldn't satisfy all the Anglican leaders. But Howe said "most will find it acceptable." Howe is staying in the Episcopal Church, even though his diocese, based in Orlando, has rejected Jefferts Schori as a leader because she is liberal.
In the document, the bishops reconfirmed a resolution passed last year by the Episcopal General Convention, urging bishops "to exercise restraint" by not consenting to a candidate for bishop "whose manner of life presents a challenge" the church and the communion.
Episcopal leaders also demanded that overseas Anglican leaders stop coming into the U.S. to take oversight of breakaway conservative Episcopal parishes. Anglican leaders from Nigeria, Rwanda, Kenya, Uganda and elsewhere have consecrated bishops to oversee congregations in the United States.
Four dioceses _ Fort Worth, Texas; Pittsburgh; Quincy, Ill.; and San Joaquin, Calif. _ are taking steps to break away and align with an overseas Anglican church. And about 60 Episcopal parishes have left or have voted to leave the national church, according to the national church.
The next crucial event for the communion will be the Lambeth Conference, in July in England. The once-a-decade meeting brings together all the bishops in the Anglican world.
Whether Williams can persuade bishops to attend will be a measure of the strength of the communion.
Williams did not invite Robinson or a U.S.-based bishop, the Rt. Rev. Martyn Minns, who leads a network of breakaway conservative Episcopal parishes aligned with the Anglican Church of Nigeria. But some Anglican prelates don't want to be even at the same table as Episcopalians who consecrated Robinson.
Separately, Robinson has been in private talks with the archbishop of Canterbury to find a way he can attend, as an observer perhaps, and bishops in New Orleans this week voted to support that effort.
You actually read that? How bored are you?
Highlight the interesting part.
Bet you read his whole post
The statement mostly reiterated earlier pledges by the church, and it will not be known for some time whether the bishops went far enough to help prevent an Anglican schism.
That's as far as I made it. The church pledges. Right.
I didn't read the post, just picked up on the key words Gay Bishops
Riser likes bashing his Bishop..
Well when you can get it any other way...
He clearly thinks it's his best option [/cruel]
More like the best option for everyone else
Saves the risk of Mini MeMeMeSpace postings...
the patter of tiny knuckles
He likes to rough up the suspect!
*dusts off strap on*
** Posts TV scotch bonnet chilli oil lubricant **
*can't resist, eats lubricant*
Now you can honestly say to Mikey your BJ's are hot stuff..
hell yeah
And for wingy it would just be like having another dose of the clap. Tom really should get himself cleaned up.
Wingy has the dock rats from Holyhead?
He has more crabs than a rockpool on cable bay
I detect a hint of the familiar aeu de whelk
Thats probalby just the dried on Llama poop
| JustPlainJef wrote : He likes to rough up the suspect! |
Sorry mate. I quoted you just so that I could have a frame of reference on the thread in being actually able to reply to someone -- like when we had it in the good old days.
So, that said, what are your thoughts on the Church and it's "modernisation" processes? You'll have to forgive me, Jef, but I cannot remember your stance when it comes to religious practice. Am I right in thinking that you are a lay religious man? A believer?
At any rate, I'm interested to read your perspective on it. I know you want to "lightning bolt" a few arses -- lol, love your work -- but still, I'd like to read more should you feel like elucidating a little further.
I'm not a religious man, and I feel that no matter what your beliefs are, you should be able to do what you love (assuming you aren't hurting others).
Gay boy scout troop leaders? Fine.
Gay priests? Fine.
Gay athletes? Fine.
Athiests in public office? Fine.
For people to say "The 77-million-member world Anglican Communion has been splintering since 2003, when Episcopalians consecrated the first openly gay bishop, V. Gene Robinson of New Hampshire." is horseshite... If there's problems with an organization of 77 million people because one person is gay, then there's deeper problems.
One of the things they are forgetting is that he was "Openly" gay, how many others have been closet gays?
It's not the gay lot that concern me. They don't exactly have a good track record when it comes to dealing with the kiddie fiddlers in their ranks.
True. The catholics tend to cover it up, and elect the chief coverer as Pope. What a charming bunch.
It's the fact that they are being used as scapegoats that concerns me
You can preach forgiveness all day long, but you should still batter kiddie fiddlers to death at every opportunity.
It's not like the catholic church hasn't known about it for long enough. Check out the Piarist Order. If that wasn't a fcuking clue all was not well in paradise I don't know what will stop them.
Making it easier for the kids to come forward without them living in fear of reprisal if they do
Hence, not hurting anybody in my prior statement.
The day religion stops hurting people is the day Wingy gets to use his wife's tradesmen entrance...
there's a trademan's entrance? She hasn't shown me that!!
It's round the back...
*puts on strap on *
Enjoy.
Oh, and be sure to tell Wingy what it was like.
Oh yeah baby!!!
| JustPlainJef wrote : I'm not a religious man, and I feel that no matter what your beliefs are, you should be able to do what you love (assuming you aren't hurting others).
|
As always, I dig your style, mate.
I' roll with that philosophy.
I still think Grossman isn't up to it, I'm afraid to say.
[/wahoo for Jef]
Yeah, I'd like to retract my prior statement about Grossman. I still think he will be quite good one day, but I don't think he'll be in a Bears uniform next year...
=o(
@ Llama - I don't think that most local priests are inherently bad, but I think that they need to break it down a bit. Most of them can't be a guide to 500 - 1000 people, what with the different masses on Sunday and the people that come and go. I think it's too much to ask. I also don't think that the people that go to church each Sunday to listen to the preacher yap and then leave and go home aren't doing very much to help themselves or their group. If more people were actually active and involved in it, even if it is singing in the choir / starting or joining a club through the church (book, cooking, movie, whatever, and not necessarily religious items, just something to get people together), that it would be better. Using the church to get people involved with each other and build better community bonds can't hurt. I also feel that if more people are involved, more people are likely to step up if they see a problem.
Yes, very idealistic, but my feelings none the less.
The boozer is the hub of all good communities. Want a builder, ask in the pub. Want a new car, ask in the pub. Need someone whacked, ask in the pub. Everything you need, all under one roof. The congregation are all local, reliable attendance and civilised opening hours. No fcuker running around with a collection plate banging on about stuff you couldn't give a sh!t about and the preacher always listens. Did I mention politics and religion are accepted as banned subjects?
True, true...
Food, drink, friends, employment opportunities, workers for hire, music, games, etc... How can you go wrong?
Oh, and as an added bonus, most of the "holier than thou" (not you Jebus) people stay away, for the most part anyway.
like all clubs, it's good to have a meeting place. The problem with most church meetings is that they only talk about and sing about the reason for having the club, more public announcements and a time for tea and biscuits where everyone can have a natter about their chosen subjects and what's going on would be a better way of doing things me thinks. Other than that, there should be plenty of Jesus blood going around
Unfortunately the 'holier than thou' don't always stay away, though they should!!!
A few weeks ago there was a Christening and a lot of people came to the boozer afterwards. They brought along with them the priest, a local lad from long ago.
Enter our kid, not happy with a priest in the boozer at all. He's not convinced when the rest of the lads tell him the priest is OK and just being one of the lads and enjoying some banter.
"I hope he can take a joke" says our kid as he strolls over and sits next to the priest. "So father, have you nonced any kids up lately?" Everyone but the priest and one of the old dears with the christening party think it's funny. The priest goes the bar to order a drink and our kid is told to take it easy and leave the fcuker alone.
Two hours later the priest is pissed beyond all belief and trying to start a fight with our kid. Half an hour later he collapsed and fell to sleep in the corner. Turns out he was a recovering alcoholic and hadn't touched a drop for over twenty years.
Our kid was delighted, claims the fcuker must have had a guilty conscience and anybody without a sense of humour in a pub deserver all they get.
| Tom_Smart wrote : The boozer is the hub of all good communities. Want a builder, ask in the pub. Want a new car, ask in the pub. Need someone whacked, ask in the pub. Everything you need, all under one roof. The congregation are all local, reliable attendance and civilised opening hours. No fcuker running around with a collection plate banging on about stuff you couldn't give a sh!t about and the preacher always listens. Did I mention politics and religion are accepted as banned subjects? |
True that!
That's dead on, I'd reckon.
| Quote : Two hours later the priest is pissed beyond all belief and trying to start a fight with our kid. Half an hour later he collapsed and fell to sleep in the corner. Turns out he was a recovering alcoholic and hadn't touched a drop for over twenty years.
|
ROFL!
That is tremendous!
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/pag [...] eri/070917
| Quote : 6. Rex Grossman, Chicago Bears: The popular sentiment in Chicago is that the Bears made it to the Super Bowl in spite of their quarterback, not because of him. A mistake-prone gunslinger often criticized for making poor decisions, Grossman may be best known in the blogosphere for his various nicknames, including the Steve Spurrier-bestowed "Sexy Rexy" and, later, the "Sex Cannon." |
lol. Good to see you, Phuks.
What happenin', bro? You doing alright?
Sexy Rexy is also a Liverpool brief. With, because of his persecution by them for being gay, a healthy dislike of dibble. I've used him a few times as I know he will do anything it takes to put one over on dibble.
ehh, i could be doing better but ill survive, i guess. you pissing it up tonight?
There are 1255 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

