Firstly, please dont turn this into an instant flame war
I agree and understand than C2D > A64 in the Desktop/gaming markets.
I realise this study is commissioned by AMD.
I simply thought it surprising and interesting, and wondered if others had any thoughts!
Server Virtulisation benchmarks by VeriTest
I know that the benchmarks seem overly focussed on IO performance, which isnt always directly related to the CPU, but I suppose this is what corporate customers do... feel free to correct me there.
I dont see any glaring errors that would invalidate the results, so it seems from this that there are business applications where Opteron outperforms Woodcrest by a significant margin.
Comments/Thoughts?
(And before calling me an AMD fanboy, the only AMD cpu I currently own is an Athlon XP 1900+ that has a hole drilled through it and is used as a keychain, all my PCs are Intel based right now)
EDIT: wrong URL
I agree and understand than C2D > A64 in the Desktop/gaming markets.
I realise this study is commissioned by AMD.
I simply thought it surprising and interesting, and wondered if others had any thoughts!
Server Virtulisation benchmarks by VeriTest
I know that the benchmarks seem overly focussed on IO performance, which isnt always directly related to the CPU, but I suppose this is what corporate customers do... feel free to correct me there.
I dont see any glaring errors that would invalidate the results, so it seems from this that there are business applications where Opteron outperforms Woodcrest by a significant margin.
Comments/Thoughts?
(And before calling me an AMD fanboy, the only AMD cpu I currently own is an Athlon XP 1900+ that has a hole drilled through it and is used as a keychain, all my PCs are Intel based right now)
EDIT: wrong URL