Firts off, I've been gone a bit so I apologize if this has already been discussed.
I've been thinking a lot about AMD's aquisition of ATI and at first, for a long time, I thought it was the worst move they could have made. It seemed pure idiocy to make such a huge acquisition at a critical time where they should have been pouring money int R&D for a new chip to beat Intel.
I see now that I was wrong.
Instead of reacting to Intel's new assault, AMD has been acting. Acting and thinking in new ways. Even so far to be considered a paradigm.
If AMD can take ATI's GPU technology and optomize it well enough to be used as a massively parallel execution engine AMD has a chance to be THE supplier of major computational horsepower.
For example, if you could have a general purpose execution engine performing at 300Gflops, and you can connect four of them using HTT 3.0 in a 1U format, that would turn some heads, would it not? Maybe use 65nm uarch to keep the heat and power requirements down.
I suspect that AMD might be trying to use 4x4 as a smokescreen to conceal their REAL next move with ATI's technology. I believe AMD means to move most of their resources out of the consumer/enthusiast space and into this new area of computing. They have a REAL chance of completely dominating, and dominating in ways that Intel may or may not fully realize yet. In fact AMD might have a shot at crushing Sun and IBM and Cray in terms of raw deployable computing horsepower.
I do wonder though if AMD has tipped their hand a little too early. I don't suppose it matters too much one way or the other. It will however be interesting to me to see if this is conjecture on my part or if it is what's really going on behind AMD's closed doors.
I know if I had a chance to take over the computing world in this fashion, I know I would be all over it too.
I've been thinking a lot about AMD's aquisition of ATI and at first, for a long time, I thought it was the worst move they could have made. It seemed pure idiocy to make such a huge acquisition at a critical time where they should have been pouring money int R&D for a new chip to beat Intel.
I see now that I was wrong.
Instead of reacting to Intel's new assault, AMD has been acting. Acting and thinking in new ways. Even so far to be considered a paradigm.
If AMD can take ATI's GPU technology and optomize it well enough to be used as a massively parallel execution engine AMD has a chance to be THE supplier of major computational horsepower.
For example, if you could have a general purpose execution engine performing at 300Gflops, and you can connect four of them using HTT 3.0 in a 1U format, that would turn some heads, would it not? Maybe use 65nm uarch to keep the heat and power requirements down.
I suspect that AMD might be trying to use 4x4 as a smokescreen to conceal their REAL next move with ATI's technology. I believe AMD means to move most of their resources out of the consumer/enthusiast space and into this new area of computing. They have a REAL chance of completely dominating, and dominating in ways that Intel may or may not fully realize yet. In fact AMD might have a shot at crushing Sun and IBM and Cray in terms of raw deployable computing horsepower.
I do wonder though if AMD has tipped their hand a little too early. I don't suppose it matters too much one way or the other. It will however be interesting to me to see if this is conjecture on my part or if it is what's really going on behind AMD's closed doors.
I know if I had a chance to take over the computing world in this fashion, I know I would be all over it too.