What's the difference?

Trinh

Distinguished
Nov 25, 2006
21
0
18,510
what's the difference between the
AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 Dual-Core Processor 4600+
(89W) for TRUE Multi-tasking - ADA4600CUBOX - Box CPU - Socket AM2
* Processor: AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core
* Model: 4600+
* Ordering P/N (PIB): ADA4600CUBOX
* Frequency: 2400Mhz
* Thermal: Power 89W
* L1 Cache: 128KB + 128KB
* L2 Cache: 512KB + 512KB
* CMOS Technology: 90nm SOI
* Socket: Socket AM2
and the
Energy efficient AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 Dual-Core Processor 4600+
(65W) - ADO4600CUBOX - Box CPU - Socket AM2
The frequencies are the same and i just don't get what's different about them
* Processor: AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core
* Model: 3800+
* Ordering P/N (PIB): ADO460CUBOX
* Frequency: 2400Mhz
* Thermal: Power 65W
* L1 Cache: 128KB + 128KB
* L2 Cache: 512KB + 512KB
* CMOS Technology: 90nm SOI
* Socket: Socket AM2
The two cpus are only 4$ apart and i just don't understand the difference or best one to get, i want top of the line, which one should i go?
 

Mex

Distinguished
Feb 17, 2005
479
0
18,780
what's the difference between the
AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 Dual-Core Processor 4600+
(89W) for TRUE Multi-tasking - ADA4600CUBOX - Box CPU - Socket AM2
* Processor: AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core
* Model: 4600+
* Ordering P/N (PIB): ADA4600CUBOX
* Frequency: 2400Mhz
* Thermal: Power 89W
* L1 Cache: 128KB + 128KB
* L2 Cache: 512KB + 512KB
* CMOS Technology: 90nm SOI
* Socket: Socket AM2
and the
Energy efficient AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 Dual-Core Processor 4600+
(65W) - ADO4600CUBOX - Box CPU - Socket AM2
The frequencies are the same and i just don't get what's different about them
* Processor: AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core
* Model: 3800+
* Ordering P/N (PIB): ADO460CUBOX
* Frequency: 2400Mhz
* Thermal: Power 65W
* L1 Cache: 128KB + 128KB
* L2 Cache: 512KB + 512KB
* CMOS Technology: 90nm SOI
* Socket: Socket AM2
The two cpus are only 4$ apart and i just don't understand the difference or best one to get, i want top of the line, which one should i go?
I highlighted the differences. You're comparing the X2 4600+ to its EE (Energy Efficient) counterpart. In other words, the EE version consumes less power and dissipates less heat. If you aren't planning to overclock, I (personally) would take the EE 4600+.
 

Trinh

Distinguished
Nov 25, 2006
21
0
18,510
well i understand one is energy efficient but i guess what i was getting at is, are there any set backs about the energy efficient one, and if there's no set backs i'll go for the energy effecient one, for only 4 dollars more it uses alot less power
 

evilr00t

Distinguished
Aug 15, 2006
882
0
18,980
drawbacks... that it's not really worth the money; the same effect can be achieved by undervolting your CPU instead.

Oh, $4 apart? Get the EE, it's a higher binned part.
 

Trinh

Distinguished
Nov 25, 2006
21
0
18,510
oh sorry didn't see that, it's just someone said to go for the normal and personally i was gonna go for the EE, i was just double checking to make sure they didn't make something about the processor which was a drawback, thx for the advice^^
 

Mex

Distinguished
Feb 17, 2005
479
0
18,780
That's completely true, but the exception is that not all processors are capable of operating at lower voltages. When you buy the EE version, you're at least getting a processor that has been tested at and will work at the lower voltage.

For a $4 difference, I think it's worth it. $40? That's a different story...

EDIT: Oh wait - you changed your mind and rendered this post useless.
 

bigsby

Distinguished
Jan 13, 2006
308
0
18,780
I have the M2N-E and it's a very solid motherboard, and it's not a bad overclocker, it's just picky on some things. It's around 100 bucks and it's got silent heatpipe goodness. Just don't use OCZ ram, because it doesn't work in Asus motherboards.
 

TRENDING THREADS