Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > leaving your computer on 24/7 better for it, a myth?

leaving your computer on 24/7 better for it, a myth?

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs - leaving your computer on 24/7 better for it, a myth?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Page:    Previous 1 2 Next Bottom Search this thread
Word :    Username :           
 

Hi all i have a question only the experts here can answer, yes thats you wusy, jack and the gang.

Basicly its this, i leave my computer on from the morning till bedtime, no its not being used all that time but off and on during the day, yes it hibernates or goes into power saving mode when im not usng it for extended times, but my question is, if i turn off the computer at night, saving it say 8-10 hours a day of none usage is that better for it, will i be extending the life of my components that extra 30-45 percent, or worse off.

my friend leaves his computer on year round 24/7 and only restarts it when an update requires it, to me, id think the components, the extra power on electricity would be good to shut it off for those 8-10 hours a day, but ive heard so much about leaving them on. is there any bad side to leaving them on 24/7 or all good?

thanks for all those who respond, im sure theres no benchmarks or stats to prove one side or another however i trust your expert opinion but if you have some basis please do share.

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

My computer is so powerful, I always shut it down at night because I'm afraid if I left it on without my keeping an eye on it, it might become self-aware and try to take over the world. :D

Seriously, though, I've seen studies about that issue (leaving it on, versus frequent turn-ons, turnoffs) and they were inconclusive.

Personally, I'm more concerned about the possibility of a fan bearing burning out in the middle of the night and something overheating, so I turn mine off when not in use.

As long as you always let it sit for about 30 seconds or so before turning it back on, you should be OK. The worst thing you can do to a computer or any other electronic device is to turn it off and then immediately turn it back on.

Reply to brainysmurf

I used to believe in the 24/7 thing myself, but after some thought I have concluded that as an enthusiast we upgrade and change components so regularly anyway that turning it off is not likely to make enough difference that the components will fail before your next upgrade anyway. So I say turn it off and save the electricity.

Reply to gr8mikey
- 0 +

Good question Dude :D

My experience in the "solid state electronics" industry shows that the majority of SS device failures occurs at initial power up as in "da' SOB was working yesterday, but when I turned it on this morning it smoked and croaked!"

I have several servers that run 24/7 ... worst thing that has ever happened is a CPU HSF or case fan (sleeve bearing) would begin to squeal, necessitating replacement. I never had a ball bearing fan fail yet, and the sleeve bearing failures I've had never "locked up" the fan rotation, just made a "really gets your attention" noise.

So, either choice you make, on/off or 24/7, "works". The issue as I see it is power consumption and heat generation versus convenience or necessity.

Reply to ecosoft

Quote :

My computer is so powerful, I always shut it down at night because I'm afraid if I left it on without my keeping an eye on it, it might become self-aware and try to take over the world. :D



lmao thats the best answer anyone could have ever given! lol

Well i was under the impression that everytime a computer is shutdown there is slight damage to the hard drive... the needle skips?

I guess i never really tried to findout if thats the case...

Hmm

... lets get someone who knows their stuff in here

Reply to trinitron64

Turning it off overnight would probably be worth it. If you're going to the store to buy milk, going to a class for a few hours, etc... it probably wouldn't be worth it. I tell the people using the technology at where I work to turn their computers off for holidays breaks, vacations, and weekends and to otherwise leave them on over-night.

Shutting a computer off not only saves electricity, but it stop the hard drive and fans from spinning, which are some of the big failure points, the wear-and-tear parts.

So to recap, I think you'd really be fine either way, but to save power and wear and tear you may wish to shut it off while you sleep.

Reply to TechnologyCoordinator
- 0 +

Quote :

My computer is so powerful, I always shut it down at night because I'm afraid if I left it on without my keeping an eye on it, it might become self-aware and try to take over the world. :D



lmao thats the best answer anyone could have ever given! lol

Well i was under the impression that everytime a computer is shutdown there is slight damage to the hard drive... the needle skips?

I guess i never really tried to findout if thats the case...

Hmm

... lets get someone who knows their stuff in hereI think that was back in the old days.... The reason for having to "park" the heads before shutdown. :)

Reply to 1Tanker

I'd do it to preserve my HDD life, but then again, that's me... not to mention my comp is damn loud and I'd rather sleep with it off (because it's next to me at all times!)

Otherwise, I really don't see much of a difference. Mechanical parts will eventually wear off, but since the MTBF is a million hours or so, nothing to really worry about... usually...

Reply to Doughbuy
- 0 +

When I lived in the dorms, I used to leave my computer on 24/7 - mainly for convenience and I didn't pay for electricity. Now, being a poor college student, the only time I leave my computer on overnight is either a) downloading/uploading large files b) virus scans etc or c) defrags.

I do use a old IBM Aptiva as a linux firewall and that obviously runs 24/7, but the processing power that is required even on the heaviest traffic (hundres of peers) never exceded 1.5% of a 550mhz P3.

Next on the list is using another old P3 as a backup file server - or perhaps an ftp server.

Reply to Fulmar

I leave my computer on 24/7, I started to turn off at night in about a week a stick of ram went bad. The ram was 1 year old and had been overclocked and voltage increases also. but when it failed its was running at spec. Now always on

Reply to yourbestfriend

OK, I leave my computer 24/7 turned on. Think about a lamp, every time you turn it on it is stressed by a high current and transitory energy effects. The major possibility for a lamp to burn and stop working is at the moment it is turned on. The same can happend to electronic components. But you may think of save energy and money too. If you don´t want or need to keep your computer working 24/7 then avoid turning on and off too much. Another detail is about HDs. When they are turned off theirs heads land on the discs. Every time they land they are destroyed a little and in a unforseen future they may crash. When working they "fly" over the disc and don´t touch them at all. Any comments?

Reply to Original

I personally subscribe to the theory that heating and cooling cycles are the most stressful thing for these devices.

Even a HDD motor is going to be stressed more constantly spinning up and down than by running continually.

Plus I like to be able to connect to the PC remotely from anywhere and for it to instantly "be there" when i come to use it.

Monitors however, I tend to let turn off. TFT CCFL back lights have a limited lifespan, and CRTs lose sharpness and brightness with age

Reply to darkstar782

I turn off my PC when I'm not using it. While repeated electrical shock of on/off can eventually damage components it is very remote. Basically the component is not very likely to fail as a result from electrical shock before I perform an upgrade.

The real concern is the cost of electricity. Unfortunately NYC has a rather high electricity costs of $0.19 per KWH. A system that idles at 200w typically costs about an additional $110 a year if it is left on overnight for 8 hours a day, every single day.

Reply to jaguarskx

Quote :

My computer is so powerful, I always shut it down at night because I'm afraid if I left it on without my keeping an eye on it, it might become self-aware and try to take over the world. :D



lmao thats the best answer anyone could have ever given! lol

Well i was under the impression that everytime a computer is shutdown there is slight damage to the hard drive... the needle skips?

I guess i never really tried to findout if thats the case...

Hmm

... lets get someone who knows their stuff in hereI think that was back in the old days.... The reason for having to "park" the heads before shutdown. :)

you just brought back memories of dos 5 and windows 3.1 with having to type in park at the prompt before shut down :)

Reply to chocobocorey
- 0 +

Quote :

My computer is so powerful, I always shut it down at night because I'm afraid if I left it on without my keeping an eye on it, it might become self-aware and try to take over the world. :D



lmao thats the best answer anyone could have ever given! lol

Well i was under the impression that everytime a computer is shutdown there is slight damage to the hard drive... the needle skips?

I guess i never really tried to findout if thats the case...

Hmm

... lets get someone who knows their stuff in hereI think that was back in the old days.... The reason for having to "park" the heads before shutdown. :)

you just brought back memories of dos 5 and windows 3.1 with having to type in park at the prompt before shut down :)Yeah, i was to lazy so i wrote a little batch file, so i just hit "P" to park the heads. LOL. :?

Reply to 1Tanker
- 0 +

IMHO, on or off 24/7 is just a matter of preference and economy/budget (excluding extreme environments). Almost all PC components for the last five to ten years have been designed to withstand temp cycling caused by warm up and cool down associated with power up/down.

Hard drives have had "auto-parking" for the heads for about the same time, when a drive is turned off the heads automatically park on an area of the platters before they have a chance to damage the area where data is stored.

So you have to ask yerself "Do I want to leave my PC on all the time and incur bearing wear and the cost in electrcity to run it, or do I want to have to wait for it to boot if I shut it off?"

Electrolytic caps in the PC are about the only thing that will dry up and fail, as some have seen, a failed cap can fail "explosively". As long as the covers are on your CPU there is usually no personal danger unless it catches fire.

Reply to blunc
- 0 +

Quote :

i have had fewer failures leaving it on 24/7;but that could be luck of the draw as well.glad you posted this.

i think it is both myth and fact depending on the quality of components.if you get the poorly manufactured stuff that surges when its turned on it will fail with repeated power ups .if you have flawless circuitry and high end capacity for surge supression you may extend component life by powering down.

its a crapshoot;and the odds arent heavilly in favor of the latter unless you spend inordinate amounts of money for exquisitely tested stuff.

Yeah, there are advantages and disadvantages to both.. It's similar to the turning lights off theory. I'm anal about my wife, and kids...and me, turning off a light when you leave a room.....even if it's just for 1 minute. But there are those who say that it takes just as much electricity to turn the light on again, and reheat the filament. :? What do you do? I stick with turning them out.

Reply to 1Tanker
- 0 +

All depends on how you use your pc. I run scheduled tasks at night, i.e. backups, defrag, etc.. If you dont have a need to run tasks on your pc in off hours, then shutting it off wouldnt hurt it. Every environment I work in is 24/7, so everything is always on. I don't want to wait for mine to boot up, so for me i'll pay for the extra electricity.

Reply to gpfear
- 0 +

The notion to leave it on 24/7 came from the old days when chip creep was a factor. The warming and cooling of the components caused expansion and contraction of components, in particular memory. A symptom of the expansion/contraction cycle was that the DIPP pins would "creep" out of the sockets of memory, CPU, BIOS or anything else in that type of socket.

Now adays it is simply a matter of taste or application. I let my working system fade into hybernation. Servers are on 24/7. I haven't done the math in a while but if the electricity used is a determining factor you need to re-examine your budgetary priorities.

Reply to MISRy

I think it's a personal preference. For my build, if I wasn't so customed to leaving my computer on, I'd turn it off. Main reason, since I've built this rig, my room temperature has actually increased! The thermostat is located in my room and gaming on it for about 2 hours will keep my room about 75F. Let's put it this way, so far, since it's gotten colder outside, I've ran the AC more than the heater!!!

I never had this problem with my AMD Athlon 64 3200 (S 754), which didn't have Cool n Quiet enabled and was about just as loaded as my new build.

*shudders*

Might just be me, but I'm personally blaming the heat on my ATI X1900XT!!!

It's winter... what's cheaper? Running your computer or the heater? :P

Then again, depends if you care about the other rooms getting cold :twisted:

Reply to Eurasianman
- 0 +

There are already a few pretty good replies to this but I'll add my 2c anyway, which brings with it a couple of decades of experience with electronics...

First, let's toss the anecdotal evidence, mis-understood historical truths and old wive's tales:

Letting things sit 30s before you turn them back on is a carryover from heavy-duty motorized items like vacuum cleaners (give it enough time to spin down) and air conditioners (give it enough time for the compressor pressure to come down, as well as fans to spin down). If you were using an old hard drive with 14" platters it's good advice. Otherwise I would not worry about it. PCs need just a few seconds because everything spins down quickly and the small motors don't have enough inertia to be a problem.

Hard drive r/w heads do not rest against the platter surfaces. Yes, the clearance is tiny. But it's there. Additionally, they are all designed to park, and have been designed that way for quite a while now.

A million hours MTBF? Really? Which assemblies have a one million hour MTBF rating? One hundred and fourteen years?? No comment... :roll:

There's no such thing as flawless circuitry, especially with consumer goods. MIL spec and other stringent requirements can improve value tolerances and component reliability through better engineering, better manufacturing methods and better testing, and over-designing systems to permit more headroom for repeated stress cycles can also improve reliability, but forget the idea of flawless anything.

"Almost all PC components for the last five to ten years have been designed to withstand temp cycling caused by warm up and cool down associated with power up/down." Ehhh, NO. Sorry. No way. No more or less so than twenty years ago or thirty. Uh-uh. But that does bring up an imporant point.

On to reality:

The big point here is that power-up and power-down cause thermal cycling in the semiconductor components, and the power-up causes stress to motorized components. Ironically, the most efficient motors usually suffer the most here. And those of you who overclock are accentuating the temperature swings, further stressing the components. The thermal cycling is the part that will eventually cause microscopic imperfections or contaminants in electronic components to eventually grow or manifest to the point that they outright fail, or malfunction due to changes in that semiconductor's electrical characteristics.

Many devices do now use circuitry designed to soften the power-on shock to various sensitive components. You get what you pay for. You'll find circuitry like this in monitors but not PCs.

Watch out for MBTF numbers. Remember that standard deviation is your nemesis, and don't confuse component MTBF and assembly MTBF.

Pretty much all display technology wears relatively quickly. Turn on power saving features for your display for instant cost savings and improved service life.

Finally, think of this in terms of cost/benefit ratio. See jaguarskx' post. At 15c/kWh, turning off a conservative 200W PC for 12 hours/day will save over $131 per year. It's a gamble. What are the odds of inciting early component failure over the useful service life of a device, by just a few thousand power cycles at most? What might fail exactly and what will the failure cost?

Oh yeah, one last thought. The environment. Think about how much less burnt fossil fuel contaminates our air, and how much less spent radioactive material we have to worry about disposing of, by turning off devices we don't use.

-Brad

Reply to bberson
- 0 +

I dont know much about this admittedly but I do know two things

1. Leaving it on all the time will almost certainly knacker your fans quicker

2. Leaving it on is a total waste of electricity and for that reason alone you should definitely be turning it off at the very least at night, if all of us here at THG did that maybe we could save a few square miles of Ozone

Reply to parge

Many points already covered here and i think a key point is that the upgrade cycle is frequent enough to not worry about damage caused by the frequency in which an item is powered up. And the technology has improved to better handle this. I turn our household computers on/off at least 5 times a day w/o any problems.

Reply to sillywabbit
- 0 +

Quote :

I dont know much about this admittedly but I do know two things

1. Leaving it on all the time will almost certainly knacker your fans quicker

2. Leaving it on is a total waste of electricity and for that reason alone you should definitely be turning it off at the very least at night, if all of us here at THG did that maybe we could save a few square miles of Ozone

To add to that, for the people that don't regularly clean their cases/fans/components, dust buildup will accrue much faster. :wink:

Reply to 1Tanker

Yes it is true that you need to turn off your computer regularly.

Computers are just like people. They get tired and tempermental. They have feelings and they often develop their own personality "kwirks". Mine, for instance, will BSOD if I don't pet it and call it a "good computer" from time to time. And if it gets real pissed at me, it will send a small voltage charge through itself and remind me that I'm neglecting its needs.

Although in many cases a firm kick to the side of the case is enough to cure a computer's grumpiness, sometimes a complete shutdown and a good, long, "time-out" is needed to put our prized buckets of solder in their rightful places.

If your computer is being especially fussy, unplugging it completely and setting it it on a stool facing a dark corner is also very effective. Just be sure that the drive bays are facing the corner... or the entire purpose of putting it in the corner is lost.

And if all of that doesn't work you can enact some Chinese Water Torture.

[edit] forgot to mention that a paddle makes a good disciplinary tool as well

Reply to ragemonkey

Very interesting that only one viewpoint has been presented here thus far (granted an important one). Another thing you should be taking into account is one far more nafarious... leaving your computer turned on and plugged into the internet leaves it open for any hacker to plink away at it while your on a hot date with Mr. Sandman.

To me, computer security is a tad more important than a few measely dollars on equipment that may or may not give out in the near future, equipment that costs you a few hundred dollars, maybe. Far worse is the aggressor on your network/computer trying to get your information.

Without going into details, I have penetrated many networks and wrenched passwords, account information, and general user control away from the rightful owners... all thanks to poor security practices (like leaving your computer running all the time). I have set up zombie networks of computers (like many of yours) and could have used this bot-net for malicious purposes. However, I did not, and was acting under lawful contracts to access network security.

I assume most of you won't listen; it's a difficult battle for anyone in this field because we sound like a bunch of possessed lunitics, religiously raving and ranting about. "Oh, they're just being paranoid!" "What a naysayer." "This doesn't really happen as much as they say." "What are the chances of me being hit?"

I've heard it all.

A word to the wise... but to the wise only because fools won't listen. Your identity and data are more valuable than a worn-out chipset fan.

Reply to RicoSuave
- 0 +

Quote :

Very interesting that only one viewpoint has been presented here thus far (granted an important one). Another thing you should be taking into account is one far more nafarious... leaving your computer turned on and plugged into the internet leaves it open for any hacker to plink away at it while your on a hot date with Mr. Sandman.

To me, computer security is a tad more important than a few measely dollars on equipment that may or may not give out in the near future, equipment that costs you a few hundred dollars, maybe. Far worse is the aggressor on your network/computer trying to get your information.

Without going into details, I have penetrated many networks and wrenched passwords, account information, and general user control away from the rightful owners... all thanks to poor security practices (like leaving your computer running all the time). I have set up zombie networks of computers (like many of yours) and could have used this bot-net for malicious purposes. However, I did not, and was acting under lawful contracts to access network security.

I assume most of you won't listen; it's a difficult battle for anyone in this field because we sound like a bunch of possessed lunitics, religiously raving and ranting about. "Oh, they're just being paranoid!" "What a naysayer." "This doesn't really happen as much as they say." "What are the chances of me being hit?"

I've heard it all.

A word to the wise... but to the wise only because fools won't listen. Your identity and data are more valuable than a worn-out chipset fan.

Kevin Rose? :lol:

Reply to 1Tanker
- 0 +

Well I don't really mind if I get hacked because it's not like I have anything of value on this computer. Oooooh, my Gmail password. Whoop de frickin' doo. I can understand that this is much more dangerous for those who buy things online, or have research on their computers (though hopefully they're more stringent about their security) but I don't really apply to that rule. The once in a while that I do buy something online with my paypal account, which isn't hooked up to a credit card, I made it so that I have to phone my bank and confirm with them that I am buying this.

I keep my computer on at night because I run things on it at night, like defragging, virus scans and folding @ home. Also, I've grown accustomed to the noise of my computer and sometimes have a hard time sleeping with the lack of gentle whir.

Also, I live in a place where electricity is dirt cheap, and no where near as harmful to the environment as most places. I live on an island in southern BC, Canada, and all our power comes from a nice big hydroelectric dam somewhere outside of Vancouver. Power is around 5-6c/kwh, so it's not like I'm breaking the bank by leaving my computer on. For others, this is not true, but I like being an exception once in a while.

I'm sure I'll replace all, or most of my components before they become damaged by either problem. I'm soon going to replace the tricool fans in my computer with nice silent, high flow fans, and with the airflow in my computer, as well as the cooling solution in general, I can have any fan fail and be able to turn on my monitor in the morning and it'll be fine, though the only one that I would be the least bit worried about because I might not notice, is my vga fan. it runs at 25 percent except for when I'm gaming and it idles at 45, so as long as I don't try to play oblivion on it with a dead fan, I'm fine.


*edit* I had forgotten to mention that since I left my computer on 24/7, I have never had to turn on the heat in this room, and it stays actually 2 or 3 degrees warmer than the rest of the house, which I like my room to be at.

Reply to bigsby

I think it has to do with how your system is built. If you're using a single solid 5400rpm hard drive that runs cool, then it's probably fine to leave it on. Raptor drives create a lot of heat and spin many more RPM's than previous generation drives. If we start using new flash hard drives, leaving a system on may ultimately be better. However, with all the electricity our systems are now using (1kw PSU? wtf?) then it's probably best that we ALL shut down our systems. Keep electricity prices lower, and toxic waste (coal is used for the majority of our power) out of our water and air.

Consider too the heat buildup when you turn your fans off. Temps spike at shut down, there's a device you can buy to keep your fans spinning for a minute or two after you shut off your system to help get rid of heat. I think this will eventually become incorporated into motherboards, let's hope so.

Heat and fresh electrical flow jolts are the hardest things on your electrical components. Wear and tear from mechanical drives spinning and searching for data is eliminated by shut down. Ideally, if your system can cool itself on shut down without a sudden heat buildup then shutting the system down would probably be best, as it saves your drives and traces.

Reply to RyanMicah

Quote :

A word to the wise... but to the wise only because fools won't listen. Your identity and data are more valuable than a worn-out chipset fan.



Tell this to Google, Time-Warner, and M$. Along with just about every other large corporation. :-)

Reply to RyanMicah

Quote :

......Finally, think of this in terms of cost/benefit ratio. See jaguarskx' post. At 15c/kWh, turning off a conservative 200W PC for 12 hours/day will save over $131 per year. It's a gamble. What are the odds of inciting early component failure over the useful service life of a device, by just a few thousand power cycles at most? What might fail exactly and what will the failure cost?....

-Brad



Just to add to this thought....

Saying that the average home pc user Joe (with a cheap computer) has a computer with a 300w psu (hypothetically speaking here...), and saves the roughly $200 a year, after only 2 years, this person has saved enough to purchase another complete new system, now that cheap computer prices have fallen through the floor. All this by simply turning it off at night....

Thus, through the use of this scenario, even the cheapest user could save enough money to "Upgrade" through system replacement even if their system had any type of failure.

As for large corporations (Let alone, small businesses), I would believe that the cost of lost time/labor/component cost of replacing a failed component would easily be negated by the savings of turning off the multitude of computers.

At my house, there are 10 computers, of which only 1 computer stays on 24/7. The cost of keeping all 10 on 24/7 would be simply miserable. At my shop, there are 9 computers, of which only 1 stays on 24/7 for exactly the same reason. Even more impactful is the fact that the two systems that do stay on, were built especially for running low power.

Reply to Groveling_Wyrm

I agree, that hacking stuff is a bit freaky. I think that most of the ideas posted here support shutting down systems when not being used within a few hours.

Reply to RyanMicah

Heh. I use firewalls but no virus scanners. Most free email servers use a scanner already, and I don't open junk mail or forwards. Plus I'm running XP Pro X64, which makes it a bit more difficult for the average worm. For now. I don't really feel "targeted" by hackers, and I shut down my comps nightly too. The only thing I'm really concerned with is online banking and credit card purchases, but the numbers are out there all over anyway. I'm sure about 30K business know more about my credit than I do. Bastards.

Reply to RyanMicah

Heh, well they already have anti-hack firewalls that detected snooping. Maybe they should hook the whole internet up to GPS and send out a mini-nuke? Call it "You're F'n dead hacker mofo"...or something. :-D

Reply to RyanMicah
- 0 +

Hey Saltsping, dont they have a big mill over there? Got a ups? Did you loose power with this big storm?
The best reason to shut down may be in the power authority you use.
If you live by a large plant, they are probably using a veriable speed drive that sends out harmonics enough to kill (over time) every electronic device in a large radius. If you dont live close to a big power user, your piece of the grid may not be important enough for your electrical utility to keep in top shape.
What about storms? Have you ever noticed the lights going off, and then on again? (usually in under 1/2 second) If a branch or something blows a fuse in a transformer station, they will pulse the line, to clear the fault. That means they shut down, and hit the grid with a voltage bump, all very quickly mind. It is murder on any device that is powered at the time.
When was the last time you had a real electrician check your panel? If the neutral is not bonded properly to ground, or if your system is unbalanced, you may be overvolting, or undervolting your psu.
One thing is for sure, If I lived in Ohio, I'd only turn my computer on when I was using it.

Reply to endyen
- 0 +

Quote :

Although in many cases a firm kick to the side of the case is enough to cure a computer's grumpiness, sometimes a complete shutdown and a good, long, "time-out" is needed to put our prized buckets of solder in their rightful places.


If you kick a computer hard enough, it will reboot. :wink: I used to have a system that misbehaved often, and I found this out on several occasions. Long story short: I live in the Hot Summertime South and when the air conditioner breaks then none of the electronics enjoy being pushed. I eventually took the comp in to my local Best Buy (under warranty) and got a replacement because the overheated components eventually rendered it useless.


But as far as turning of the comp at night? I do every night because I don't like the whiny fans next to my head. When it was in the other room I would only turn in off every few weeks to use night time for long downloads and/or defragging. I suppose it mainly depends on your personal habits.

Reply to db101

Written like an electrician. :-P

Reply to RyanMicah
- 0 +

I always cut mine off at night personally. But I work at the Pentagon and the computers there are never turned off, they do patches and upgrades at night so all the computers must be left on. I have worked electronics for the last 25 years and I don't see much difference either way. I do believe you will probably use enough electricity leaving it on to more than pay for any component that might fail by power it off. And if you are going to leave it on make sure it is protected against power surges and storms.

Reply to maddad

*hax the government and takes back tax money that they'll just waste...

Reply to RyanMicah

Here are a few things that might help add to your debate:

Advantages of leaving the computer on 24/7
1. Rotating parts (hard drives and fans) last longer if left on continually rather than cycled on and off. Starting up rotating objects is far harder on them than just leaving them on.
2. Your computer can be used to do certain tasks if it's always and reliably on- e.g. function as a router, home server, web server.
3. Your OS will accumulate less in the way of startup/shutdown logs and general cruft that comes from starting up and shutting down.
4. Things in your OS get loaded into RAM after enough accesses, speeding up subsequent accesses of those programs and making them run faster.
5. You never have to wait for startup/resume to use your computer. If your computer is particularly poky to boot, resume, suspend, or shut down, you'll save time by always having and leaving it on.

Disadvantages of leaving your computer on 24/7
1. If your OS and setup is not very secure, leaving your computer on 24/7 just makes it that much easier of a target and you very much increase your chance of getting a network worm or just plain hacked.
2. Memory leaks can develop over time, eating up RAM and sacking performance.
3. Running your computer 24/7 does use more power than shutting it off.
4. More dust gets sucked up in your computer as the fans move more air than they would if they run for less time.
5. If your computer is not very well cooled, running it for an extended period of time can lead to hot spots and accelerate the demise of certain components, particularly hard drives.

So here's a few things that you need to ask yourself:
1. Is your OS and software up to the task of running 24/7? If you have memory leaks from the OS or programs that get pretty bad after a day or two or get just weird behavior after it's been on a while, perhaps it's better to just shut it off at night to get a fresh reboot each morning. If your computer could seemingly run forever without a reboot and run fine all the time, feel free to leave it on.

2. If you have a permanent Internet connection, is your computer secure enough to more or less be a sitting target for an extended period of time? Dependent on the OS, network, and protective software setup you have, this may warrant looking into or it may not be an issue at all. I'd recommend that you at the very least be behind a router or other NAT device with a hardware firewall for any OS and have a resident antivirus/antispyware program if you're on Windows.

3. Is your computer well-cooled enough that running it 24/7 won't bake a HDD or the system? This one should not be too hard to find out if your computer has hardware monitoring sensors. Just leave it on and watch the readings after a day or so.

4. Is the computer noisy and if it is, can one sleep through it if they can hear it from their bedroom? I have seen computers that sounded like hair dryers that unless there were two floors between me and it I could not sleep through their noise. Loss of sleep sucks.

I personally leave my system on 24/7 as it's a cool, quiet, reasonably well secured machine. It acts as a file, print, and terminal server on my little network and lives behind a router. I have it run Folding@Home all the time, so something gets done with the idle CPU cycles that I don't use when I am sleeping or gone during the day. My OS is more than up to the task of running for extended periods between reboots and seems to respond the same 2 minutes since restarting or 2 months since restarting. My machine can't suspend to disk or RAM very well as it's setup not very compatible with doing that. It does not boot very quickly and I have to be there to enter a couple of passwords at various points during the startup. So for my case, it's a no-brainer to leave it on 24/7, but most people probably would do better to shut them off at night.

Oh, and before I forget- ALL LAPTOP USERS SHOULD NOT LEAVE THEIR COMPUTERS ON FOR EXTENDED PERIODS OF TIME. You WILL cook your machine and slowly kill things in it, especially hard drives. I know this from experience! Laptops have HORRIBLE cooling and are really designed to be on for a short time and the CPU and HDD powered off, whether it's shut down, suspended to disk or suspended to RAM. The insides of them will very easily get to be 50 C or more after a few hours of use, and even though the CPU and chipset are especially designed to withstand being run at those temps for a long time, hard drives and other ICs are pretty similar to desktop ones. They really cannot run that hot for extended periods of time. They can only take it for short time periods and then they start to die on you.

EDIT: Also anybody who OC's they computer should shut it off at night too. Especially if it's a particularly high OC with a fair amount of Vcore bump. That makes a ton of extra heat and if the Vcore is enough, you can get electrometallic migration to trash your chip if it's high enough and you run it enough (cause of SNDS.)

And to an above poster, Raptors do not necessarily run all that hot. My Raptor 740GD is always between 27-31 C, which is not hot by any means. It just sits behind a 1500 rpm 80mm intake fan and that's enough. If I put it in the top of the computer behind the DVD drives, then maybe it'd get hot as there's little airflow up there, but the intake fan does its job.

Reply to MU_Engineer
- 0 +

My comp is on 24/7. I download when i sleep/work i play games with im awake/at home. All my anti-spyware/malware and anti-virus are set to auto run at 3:00-4:00am in the morning.

Well there are times I do turn if off...like extended periods of time where im away from home.

Only dis-advantages I can think of are the ones MU above me stated and that my comp is LOUD. Its like a jet engine. But that only annoys other people not me...the whirling of fans and the squeaking of a HDD in seek is like a melody to me and puts me to sleep. :wink:

Reply to n0odle
- 0 +

Quote :

Just to add to this thought....


All excellent thoughts here.

Savings vary, since the price of electricity varies by more than 50% throughout the USA alone. And don't confuse idle current draw with PSU ratings.

Since I tend to write in the apparent context of the question, my reply was geared toward home users. Businesses and idiots like us whose houses are heated not by gas or oil but by CPU, are another case entirely!

SOHO arrangements are frequently peer to peer, everything gets turned off at the end of the day and hopefully it all works in the morning. If something breaks it's not the end of the world because there's another computer with most of the stuff on it, and hopefully someone had a backup. With any luck, maybe it was even recent 8O

Small/medium sized business will be using, or should be using, a more client-server oriented arrangement. There's a server or two or three in a closet somewhere, humming 24x7, and the PCs on the office floor still get shut off at night. Since the servers are where all the critical stuff is hosted, losing a workstation should not be a show-stopper. Sometimes the servers host email or FTP services, all the more reason they can't be shut off. Sometimes not, but it's not seen as worth the trouble to shut the boxes down overnight for a few hundred dollars a year in savings, particularly when a server outage can cost thousands of dollars in on-site service and business interruption.

Large business are quite the extreme case. You can have dozens, hundreds or even thousands of servers and clients. Hopefully the users turn off their stuff at night, though some will try to work around existing processes and policies by leaving it on, connected to GotoMyPC or something. But the servers are where the action is, and now with the world revolving around the Internet and international markets, you end up with complicated dependencies that make just sequencing the server start-ups an impossible task, never mind the risk of business interruption if one morning a SQL server decides it doesn't want to boot up. So business that size will have huge rooms full of servers, and gobs of AC to keep 'em cool, and enormous battery banks and generators to make sure they keep humming 24x7. The waste is staggering.

Thankfully with products like VMware, the unbelievable CPU glut we now enjoy can be better put to use. Consolidation is the name of the game right now, in the quest to save on maintenance and power costs.

-Brad

Reply to bberson
- 0 +

I Leave My PC On 24/7 UNLESS, Im Upgrading It, Cleaning It, Or Am Gonna Be Gone From My House For More Than 24 Hours, Because I Am Alwayse Using It Throught The Day And If Im Not My Roomate Or Friends Are And I See It Pointless To Shut It Down If It Is Often Being Used, Plus I Use The Idle Time For Software Updates And Downloads, I Keep My Power Saving Settings On A Perfect Balance Of Conveinence And Energy Efficiancy, When Idling Or On Standby And The Room Temperature Is Less Than 85F I Have It Set So That The CPU Fan, Videocard Fan And All But The One Exaust Fan Automatically Stop Spinning (3 Out Of 4 Case Fans) Plus I Have The System Power Down My TFT After 1HR, Go Into Standby After 2HRS, The Hard Drives To Spin Down After 4Hrs And Hybernation After 24HRS Of Non-Use.

Reply to Hella-D
- 0 +

I Leave My PC On 24/7 UNLESS, Im Upgrading It, Cleaning It, Or Am Gonna Be Gone From My House For More Than 24 Hours, Because I Am Alwayse Using It Throught The Day And If Im Not My Roomate Or Friends Are And I See It Pointless To Shut It Down If It Is Often Being Used, Plus I Use The Idle Time For Software Updates And Downloads, I Keep My Power Saving Settings On A Perfect Balance Of Conveinence And Energy Efficiancy, When CPU Usage Is Below 25% For At-Least 30Minutes Or On Standby And The Case Temperature Is Less Than 90F I Have It Set So That The CPU Fan, Videocard Fan And All But The One Exaust Fan Automatically Stop Spinning (3 Out Of 4 Case Fans) Plus I Have The System Power Down My TFT After 1HR, Go Into Standby After 2HRS, The Hard Drives To Spin Down After 4Hrs And Hybernation After 24HRS Of Non-Use.

Reply to Hella-D

Don't all HDD manufactures rate their products in hours, not amount of start up times? That would indicate to me that the LONGER you use your HDDs the more likely it is they will fail, not how many times you use them.

Reply to still_life

I work with PC's that run non stop, 365 days a year. Most common failures are PSU's (caps running dry), VRM around CPU's (also caps running dry) and then memory (due to short circuit caused by dust). These PCs fail faster than a normal PC, based on minimal maintenance or care.

Due to the move to fixed caps, as opposed to wet dielectric caps, the possibility of running a PC for longer, non stop becomes greater. Only considerations are clean case and acceptible temps that is constant in their context.

The biggest electronic killer though is temp and humidity fluctuations. With a change of 4% humidity or less per hour, one can actually form micro condensation, which may cause a short on components with high density pins etc. Luckily, inside a case temps and humidity rarely varies by the above criteria.

Reply to Vokofpolisiekar

I personally believe it's best for your computer to turn it off for the night, and constantly argue with co-workers about this (they NEVER turn theirs off). However, the biggest concern to me is energy consumption.

Do you all hear yourselves? Count how many people in all the "Should I leave it on?" forums across the internet, leave their computers on 24/7 and think its "no big deal unless you want to save a few bucks".

Leaving your computer on 24/7 may not be a big deal. But add your next door neighbor's computer. And all your neighbors down the street. Then add your co-workers. And all those people in the office building downtown. You may think "one" computer is "no big deal", but add EVERYONES computers... in your town and the next, and all over the world, and you have one MASSIVE draw of energy. Have we not learned ANYTHING about waste??

And for those who leave theirs on because "It takes too long to start it up in the morning"; really? Are you in THAT much of a hurry?? Go in to the office, turn your computer on, put your stuff away and go get a cup of coffee... by the time you sit down to start work, it's done.

Reply to RedAzalea

Nice work bumping a thread from 2006.

Reply to djcoolmasterx
- 0 +

djcoolmasterx wrote :

Nice work bumping a thread from 2006.




lol i was wondering why i only recognized 2 names in the post. is there a charge for doing this similar to grave digging? :pfff:

Reply to roofus
- 0 +

ragemonkey wrote :

Yes it is true that you need to turn off your computer regularly.

Computers are just like people. They get tired and tempermental. They have feelings and they often develop their own personality "kwirks". Mine, for instance, will BSOD if I don't pet it and call it a "good computer" from time to time. And if it gets real pissed at me, it will send a small voltage charge through itself and remind me that I'm neglecting its needs.

Although in many cases a firm kick to the side of the case is enough to cure a computer's grumpiness, sometimes a complete shutdown and a good, long, "time-out" is needed to put our prized buckets of solder in their rightful places.

If your computer is being especially fussy, unplugging it completely and setting it it on a stool facing a dark corner is also very effective. Just be sure that the drive bays are facing the corner... or the entire purpose of putting it in the corner is lost.

And if all of that doesn't work you can enact some Chinese Water Torture.

[edit] forgot to mention that a paddle makes a good disciplinary tool as well



BSOD thats a driver issue. Maybe you should update your drivers. Mine does not give no BSod i leave on 24/7.

Reply to Jatt5
Previous
1 2
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > leaving your computer on 24/7 better for it, a myth?
Go to:

There are 684 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
  • 01:00 raulkm won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 letus won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 pmiddy won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 MarcieMark won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 kaypeezee won the Uniformed badge
  • 04:06 xyz001 won the Sophmore badge
  • 01:00 scione won the Freshman badge
  • 01:32 aford10 won the Home Brew badge
  • 01:00 Kevinator won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 adis won the Uniformed badge