ak47is1337

Distinguished
Jan 30, 2006
1,830
0
19,780
http://guru3d.com/newsitem.php?id=4611

Apparently, the 4x4 system, despite being a lot more expensive, is inferior, sometimes by a large margin, the the Core 2 Quad. Hold tight though, this isn't the best source and it could sway, but I've heard that all too often when people were saying "omg Conroe isn't that powerful and the benches are rigged"
just my 2 cents, can't wait for an affordable quad core on either side.
 
http://guru3d.com/newsitem.php?id=4611

Apparently, the 4x4 system, despite being a lot more expensive, is inferior, sometimes by a large margin, the the Core 2 Quad. Hold tight though, this isn't the best source and it could sway, but I've heard that all too often when people were saying "omg Conroe isn't that powerful and the benches are rigged"
just my 2 cents, can't wait for an affordable quad core on either side.

This horse has been beaten to death already here: http://forumz.tomshardware.com/hardware/AMD-Quad-FX-Core-Extreme-QX-6700-Benchmarks-ftopict210997.html
 

nategarst

Distinguished
Jan 26, 2006
166
0
18,680
http://guru3d.com/newsitem.php?id=4611

Apparently, the 4x4 system, despite being a lot more expensive, is inferior, sometimes by a large margin, the the Core 2 Quad. Hold tight though, this isn't the best source and it could sway, but I've heard that all too often when people were saying "omg Conroe isn't that powerful and the benches are rigged"
just my 2 cents, can't wait for an affordable quad core on either side.

This horse has been beaten to death already here: http://forumz.tomshardware.com/hardware/AMD-Quad-FX-Core-Extreme-QX-6700-Benchmarks-ftopict210997.html

Atleast the link from the op, I can read it. Came up as jibberish on the other one.