You miss my point, I don't necessarily believe anything I just said. I was merely demonstrating an opposing subjective argument.
My point is that whether you believe your unpopular facts are true (I agree with some, not with others, but thats not for this forum), they are subjective, based on your perception. I guarantee there are others out there that believe they have equally unpopular and true facts.
and has failed to live up to his promises on the economy and health care.
At the risk of turning this into a idiotic politics argument im going to ask a couple questions
#1. what promises has he lived up to let alone those and
#2. i swear he broke all them almost in hte first couple months.
Now onto the argument of good looks and such.
Bush for example didnt have popularity the first time he was elected didnt have it through his first 4 years. He still doesnt have it. He speaks like a trained monkey.
Now i would be interested to see peoples views on how a man that hasnt kept one promise, that has totaly destroyed the country handed to him, And has been unpopuler since his election can still be elected two times on good looks
Seriously things like this could have marrit since it would be the only thing that could possibly explain his terms. (that and his family pretty much buying it for him)
I do not aim to get into a debate on facts with you, however, I will point out one last thing as part of my subjective argument:
I have talked to many people that blamed Clinton's early economic success on having a Republican Congress, saying that Congress was in charge of the economy, not the president. These same people later placed the economic slowdown squarely on Clinton's shoulders. As I said, most of these things are subjective.
For the record, I am also very aware of the economic situation of the time since I was working in a building trades union (Generally a very good indicator of the overall strength of the economy is how much work we got) for some of that time, and working an internship for the rest of it. Not that that fact is really relevant.
Many of the same people deserve credit for the ensuing economic turndown as well, as a lot of it was due to the dotcom implosion brought upon by flawed economic models and spending Millions in capital without ever making a profit. That and the fact that companies were already beginning to misrepresent their earnings to make themselves look better...