If you're not overclocking, do go for a better cooler.
nah, not with an E6300 and the stock cooler, might be able to get to 2.4ghz at most, if you want to get to 3ghz buy an aftermarket hsf and some better ram (800mhz instead of 667) for the cooler i would get either the tuniq tower 120 (good luck on finding one) or the scythe infinity.
eh, maybe 2.8, but just spend the 50 bucks on an aftermarket hsf, your cpu will run cooler and you wont have to worry as much about the thing getting fried.
But if I use stock+E6400, would I be able to reach 2.8-3ghz? Yeah, I was thinking that if I get a cooler, it would be safer to OC and cost about the same as the E6400.
You couldn't be more wrong. 6300 will easily hit 2.8 with stock cooling with the right mobo. Stock HSF will provide decent cooling at least to 2.8. I'm hovering near 3.0 (425 FSB currently), and temps are a touch warm, but still safe.nah, not with an E6300 and the stock cooler, might be able to get to 2.4ghz at most, if you want to get to 3ghz buy an aftermarket hsf and some better ram (800mhz instead of 667) for the cooler i would get either the tuniq tower 120 (good luck on finding one) or the scythe infinity.
Go for E6400 + stock hsf. Later on, buy the aftermarket hsf. Simple huh?
Don't listen to apt403, the stock cooler is fine for overclocking. If you want a good overclock, the E6400 has a greater chance of being a "top" core than the E6300. A bigger cooler is a nice idea for reducing noise, but adds very little to the achievable clock speed.
Go for E6400 + stock hsf. Later on, buy the aftermarket hsf. Simple huh?
Go for E6400 + stock hsf. Later on, buy the aftermarket hsf. Simple huh?
what???? I mean 40$ is a big deal????? Even if he is a student he can still wait a couple of weeks and save some more money. If he's gotta have it right now, then yes, I'll agree 6300 is just as good and really a fast cpu nonetheless.
...and then you keep ranting about different things that really can't compare.
How is the 1200$ quad core can compare with a 180$ and 220$ cpu, beats me. The day that a quad core of the same freq. will be in the price range of 40$+ from the dual core, then you gonna have a valid point. Don't see it happening anytime soon though.
We all have different opinions, and mine is the above stated. Yours is different . But don't expect me to agree with you.
peace bro!
I see where you're coming from...but $40 is a nice meal out with the woman. Smile I just think that if he plans to upgrade in the future [and let's face it, prices drop like flies (flies live for 24 hrs)] quad core chips, despite what anyone says will be affordable before you know it. In a year or so we'll see some multi-threaded apps popping up to make use of them. 2009 isn't that far away anymore. Isn't there supposed to be a new release of Windows then? Sure, $40 will get you a nice little bump today. But $40 a single year from now will get you an even better bump.
I could also argue this:
Our generations don't know how to save money, and any argument you have towards wasting more of it can be trumped by your grandparents and the depression. Must I even mention that Chinese companies are looking at BUYING our automobile companies? You seem to forget where your wealth came from and how ultimately limited it is. Do you honestly think that $40, 15 years from now won't be worth a lot more to you? Do you not understand that the American dollar is losing value? LOL You arrogant fool. You live in the moment like all the other spoiled people in this century. Rome is gone. The Soviet Union is gone. You think our country is bound to last another century. Ha. If I were you, I'd save your $40 and start learning mandarin. It is afterall, the most used language on earth by far, and China is now the manufacturing capital of the world.
You act as though $40 is nothing, and that a few more mhz is going to show a huge difference when quad core might soon be affordable. Furthermore, he might wish to switch to AMD as they could very well have a plan to stomp Intel. But then again, you are an enthusiast and enthusiasm about a few more mhz isn't really unexpected.
I see where you're coming from...but $40 is a nice meal out with the woman. Smile I just think that if he plans to upgrade in the future [and let's face it, prices drop like flies (flies live for 24 hrs)] quad core chips, despite what anyone says will be affordable before you know it. In a year or so we'll see some multi-threaded apps popping up to make use of them. 2009 isn't that far away anymore. Isn't there supposed to be a new release of Windows then? Sure, $40 will get you a nice little bump today. But $40 a single year from now will get you an even better bump.
I could also argue this:
Our generations don't know how to save money, and any argument you have towards wasting more of it can be trumped by your grandparents and the depression. Must I even mention that Chinese companies are looking at BUYING our automobile companies? You seem to forget where your wealth came from and how ultimately limited it is. Do you honestly think that $40, 15 years from now won't be worth a lot more to you? Do you not understand that the American dollar is losing value? LOL You arrogant fool. You live in the moment like all the other spoiled people in this century. Rome is gone. The Soviet Union is gone. You think our country is bound to last another century. Ha. If I were you, I'd save your $40 and start learning mandarin. It is afterall, the most used language on earth by far, and China is now the manufacturing capital of the world.