Obama

Forum Old Man/Woman's Club : Other - Obama

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Page:    Previous 1 2 Next Bottom Search this thread
Word :    Username :           
 

Obama is caring and intelligent --two important qualities that should be required of those responsible for others. He expresses himself genuinely, which is extremely rare in a politician. I'm very proud of Americans willingness to put differences aside and see their fellow man for what he really is.

In the past, I've been misunderstood by some, thinking I’m an anti American. However, nothing is further from the truth. I was born in Iran, during the chaotic Iranian revolution. I have lived through the over 8 year long war between Iran and Iraq. I've seen the result of war, up close and personal, all while being systematically persecuted due to religious beliefs. I know what its like to be denied the right to leave the country that persecutes you, and have to cross the border under gun fire. I know what its like to feel like an outsider, once, twice, and then, again. I've come to see my world controlled by those who came before me, thinking being first somehow gives them the right to enslave masses. I do not recognize borders or races. Earth is my home. More specifically, currently, that is a piece of land called America. I personally don't doubt my love for this land, but some have and still do, which is fine by me.

I'd like Obama to succeed. Other than him being caring, who and what he is provides great leverage for this country’s global relations. He is by far the best candidate for improving other nation’s view of America. In my opinion, which I hope you have an idea of after having read the above, this will be good for us all. I mean all of us humans, everywhere.
I posted this a while ago, but since it may be considered contradicting by some, I thought I’d be the first to point it out.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by scamtrOn on 05-03-2008 at 03:22:30 AM
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Obama, Clinton, McCain. The U.S. is f*cked. It was fun while it lasted...

Is 60 years enough time to qualify as an empire?

------------------------------ +35 Wingding approval points +10 Scouse approval +22 Mammary Manipulation
+5 Comedy +15 Belated Holy Points +5 Messianic Approval + 5 penile innovation
+13 Baked Ham creativity +65 Obscure Quote

Reply to KingLoftusXII

Better Obama then Clinton. Sadly, as long as these things called 'humans' live, all of whatever will stay forever.

I got thinking. A capitalist market focuses on human greed to bring better things into the market. Basically, it takes something selfish and turns it into a good thing. I wonder if we can do that somehow with human relationships...Wingding love?

------------------------------ "Nvidia, the Way It's Meant to be PAID Played! - Corrado
*Lesbian Lover Club* - founder Assman
Reply to Evilonigiri
- 0 +

Meritocratic dictatorship is the only way. F* democracy. F* communism. Both do not take human weakness into account. Both are failures.

Thank you.

------------------------------ http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html - I WISH PEOPLE WOULD APPLY THIS!
Reply to mugz

I take human weakness into account every time I rob someon.....enter a business relationship.

Reply to Tom_Smart
- 0 +

Exactly! You dictate that some other guy doesn't merit his fortune, so you take it!...

...wait...

------------------------------ http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html - I WISH PEOPLE WOULD APPLY THIS!
Reply to mugz

...*waits*...

------------------------------ No more promise no more sorrow,
No longer will I follow.
Can anybody hear me?
I just want to be me.
Reply to JustPlainJef

*joins jef in waiting*

so, come here often.

------------------------------ I'm a git, deal with it.

Antec 1200,PC Power & Cooling 750,Gigabyte DS4-x48,Intel Q9550@3.4 W/Xigmatek S1283,8GB OCZ DDR2 800,ATI 4870X2,X-FI>CA 640C amp>Tannoy R300/Senn 595's
Reply to strangestranger

Yes. You?

------------------------------ No more promise no more sorrow,
No longer will I follow.
Can anybody hear me?
I just want to be me.
Reply to JustPlainJef
- 0 +

Evilonigiri wrote :

Better Obama then Clinton.



Hell yeah, but I say it's all Bill's fault she turned out to be a "manly woman". If he did her right in the first place :bounce: she wouldn't be so bitchy.

------------------------------ "Lesbian Loverz Club" -Founder
http://i48.tinypic.com/20gmb5w.jpg
http://i47.tinypic.com/ifvojt.png
http://i45.tinypic.com/1znszrp.jpg
Reply to Assman

As a lesbian lover I thought you would be into Clinton? Lets face it she is a dyke.

Reply to audiovoodoo
- 0 +

I don't think it's Bill's fault that Hillary becomes more ugly as each year passes.

------------------------------ Doctor Hooter
Boobs Boobs Boobs...who loves boobs?...I do I do

 

Reply to zpyrd

- 0 +

I think Bill was just fooling around with Monica. Let's face it...Monica is not a great piece of ass. Nor does she swallow.

------------------------------ Doctor Hooter
Boobs Boobs Boobs...who loves boobs?...I do I do

 

Reply to zpyrd

She was however a clever scheming little bitch. Something of a ditch pig herself for not getting the dress cleaned

Reply to audiovoodoo
- 0 +

zpyrd wrote :

I don't think it's Bill's fault that Hillary becomes more ugly as each year passes.



ugly people make me sad... :)

------------------------------ "Lesbian Loverz Club" -Founder
http://i48.tinypic.com/20gmb5w.jpg
http://i47.tinypic.com/ifvojt.png
http://i45.tinypic.com/1znszrp.jpg
Reply to Assman

how the hell do you survive looking in the mirror each day?

------------------------------ I'm a git, deal with it.

Antec 1200,PC Power & Cooling 750,Gigabyte DS4-x48,Intel Q9550@3.4 W/Xigmatek S1283,8GB OCZ DDR2 800,ATI 4870X2,X-FI>CA 640C amp>Tannoy R300/Senn 595's
Reply to strangestranger
- 1 +

I drink heavily :)

------------------------------ "Lesbian Loverz Club" -Founder
http://i48.tinypic.com/20gmb5w.jpg
http://i47.tinypic.com/ifvojt.png
http://i45.tinypic.com/1znszrp.jpg
Reply to Assman
- 1 +

scamtrOn wrote :

Obama is caring and intelligent --two important qualities that should be required of those responsible for others. He expresses himself genuinely, which is extremely rare in a politician. I'm very proud of Americans willingness to put differences aside and see their fellow man for what he really is.

In the past, I've been misunderstood by some, thinking I’m an anti American. However, nothing is further from the truth. I was born in Iran, during the chaotic Iranian revolution. I have lived through the over 8 year long war between Iran and Iraq. I've seen the result of war, up close and personal, all while being systematically persecuted due to religious beliefs. I know what its like to be denied the right to leave the country that persecutes you, and have to cross the border under gun fire. I know what its like to feel like an outsider, once, twice, and then, again. I've come to see my world controlled by those who came before me, thinking being first somehow gives them the right to enslave masses. I do not recognize borders or races. Earth is my home. More specifically, currently, that is a piece of land called America. I personally don't doubt my love for this land, but some have and still do, which is fine by me.

I'd like Obama to succeed. Other than him being caring, who and what he is provides great leverage for this country’s global relations. He is by far the best candidate for improving other nation’s view of America. In my opinion, which I hope you have an idea of after having read the above, this will be good for us all. I mean all of us humans, everywhere.
I posted this a while ago, but since it may be considered contradicting by some, I thought I’d be the first to point it out.




Hi Scammy, Well Obama? I like the guy but it seems he's making promises he's not going to be able to keep, or if he does keep the promises he's making some will be severely detrimental, just flat pulling our troops out of Iraq would be the worst thing we could possibly do.

Iran and Iraq were like natural checks and balances, however with Saadam out of the picture, and the US pulled out of the area, whats going to happen over there?

I've said before if we were going to have a black president I'd love to see Colin Powell run for office, but thats not who's running, Obamas just too young and inexperienced, theres no way in hell I'd vote for him or Hillary.

I never was for us getting into this situation with Iraq in the first place, but that changed once we got into it and started loosing our soldiers to it, it was time to stand behind your soldiers and not leave them out on a limb, but government likes playing the politic chess game with live soldiers and dragging it out by pulling some here and cutting some there, instead of giving them what they need to get the job done, and allowing them to finish what they started.

So if Obama pulls us out of Iraq, is that to save existing soldiers, or money, what does that really account to?

So does that mean the entire Iraq venture was a failure, if so hows it classed, and what happens to all the soldiers that have died, been maimed, crippled and disabled standing in the gap for this country, is Obama thinking about the long term results of pulling us out, when he makes those kind of statements, or is he just trying to get elected to help sell his books, even if Hillary beats him out, his book sales should skyrocket.

All the candidates seem to be good salesmen or saleswomen, telling you what they think you want and need to hear, but keeping those promises in a country thats really run by the government with a presidential puppet to take the blame, is another thing altogether. Ry

------------------------------ Badges? We don't need no stinkin' badges!
Reply to 4ryan6

Please pull those troops out now, if you really supported the troops you would do everything you could to end this war. Why?

 

%u201COf all the enemies to public liberty war is, perhaps, the most to be dreaded because it comprises and develops the germ of every other. War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and taxes. And armies and debts, and taxes are the known instruments for bringing many under the domination of a few%u201D
--James Madison 1797

 

The Bush regime just wants to further its imperialists goals anyway. They don't give a **** about the soldiers, as evidence by the veterans hospitals, low salaries (what 30k, while oil engineers get 100k over there, that lets you know what the real reason is for the war), and a doubling in tours.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by DarthPiggie on 05-04-2008 at 11:12:59 PM
------------------------------ Do not fall prey to perceived obsolescence.
Reply to DarthPiggie

Howdy Ryan! Been some time, eh? Hope you're doing well.

Quote :

I like the guy but it seems he's making promises he's not going to be able to keep, or if he does keep the promises he's making some will be severely detrimental, just flat pulling our troops out of Iraq would be the worst thing we could possibly do.


That’s a legitimate concern, one I share with you, and I believe many other people, not just in America, but around the world. That being said, the one candidate who has best addressed this issue is Obama. Ryan, you might be thinking about another candidate’s reply regarding pulling out of Iraq. Obama has not said he would “flat” pull the troops out. If that was the case, I would also disagree with him. I won’t quote his response on this issue, rather encourage you view it on google video or another source.

Quote :

Iran and Iraq were like natural checks and balances, however with Saadam out of the picture, and the US pulled out of the area, whats going to happen over there?


It’s impossible to tell, but there ARE certainties. Certainties such as the most corrupt/powerful will gain control. No one wants that, but neither McCain nor Hillary supplied a non aggressive, yet constructive answer.

Quote :

Obamas just too young and inexperienced


Personally, my life experiences do not allow me to make a judgment on ones experience based on their age. In fact, I have found that to be quite misleading. Although people view this differently, I have weighed each candidate, and found that while Obama has a short record, he has the best record. If he was as outstanding in anything else, he would be considered a prodigy. I would like to think you disagree with me.

Quote :

I never was for us getting into this situation with Iraq in the first place, but that changed once we got into it and started loosing our soldiers to it, it was time to stand behind your soldiers and not leave them out on a limb, but government likes playing the politic chess game with live soldiers and dragging it out by pulling some here and cutting some there, instead of giving them what they need to get the job done, and allowing them to finish what they started.


As you know, I value everyone’s life equally and I’m saddened to see both sides loosing. That’s what a war is; civilian sacrifice. Wars are never for the people. I view Obama as a person who actually cares about people. That’s what all of his responses convey. He is a tough kind person, and that really is a rare combination. Hopefully this nation will take advantage of this and become a roll model for other governments. He certainly has had the most colorful and diverse life out of the other candidates, and he knows what its like to be a proletariat. That is very important.


I want to add; I have never involved myself in anything political on any level, until now. That’s because I have never seen anything good in anything political, until now.

Take care, Ryan!


Message edited by scamtrOn on 05-05-2008 at 12:16:31 AM
Reply to scamtrOn
- 0 +

AAAAARRRGHH!!!!!

*headbutts all people within this thread, inflicting multiple concussions, fractures, and various blunt-head-trauma wounds*

------------------------------ http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html - I WISH PEOPLE WOULD APPLY THIS!
Reply to mugz
- 0 +

@scamtrOn

Well between Obama and Clinton we don't yet know who is actually taking the nomination, so your points are definitely taken into consideration!

Have a great day Scammy! Ry

------------------------------ Badges? We don't need no stinkin' badges!
Reply to 4ryan6

DarthPiggie wrote :

...as evidence by the veterans hospitals, low salaries (what 30k, while oil engineers get 100k over there, that lets you know what the real reason is for the war)...


Front line grunts making $30K. ENGINEERS making $100K. That sounds about right...

What do the high ranking generals over there make a year?

You know what, don't answer that, or anything else.

Ever.

------------------------------ No more promise no more sorrow,
No longer will I follow.
Can anybody hear me?
I just want to be me.
Reply to JustPlainJef
- 0 +

Hey - leave us engineers alone, okay? We work in hellish conditions, dealing with heavy equipment that can and WILL kill us given half a chance, after four-plus years of heavy training. Oil engineers have it even rougher.

So if someone who is simply shown which end of an assault rifle is which, and shown which direction to shoot it in, and is issued with the minimum of equipment, is paid one-third of what I'm paid, well, my heart bleeds for him. Really, it does. In fact, this injustice moves me to...

*PFFFFFffffffrrt!*

...er, can someone get the window?

------------------------------ http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html - I WISH PEOPLE WOULD APPLY THIS!
Reply to mugz
- 0 +

The only thing I like about Obama is that he's making so many promises he can't keep. IF he should by reason of stupidity in America be elected, he'll fail to get a lot of things done, thus leaving the least amount of impact on this country.

Let's cover a few things on Obama:

First, he wants to raise the Capital Gains Tax. ANYONE with any intelligence knows this is NOT A GOOD IDEA. Obama wants to raise this tax to generate revenue to pay for other 'things.' The Capital Gains Tax is a tax placed on money basically in the Stock Market. America as a whole is not doing a good job in saving their money. This is a major problem as we all know resulted in the credit crunch and new FICO ruleset coming out in February.
Effects of raising the CGT:
If you have money invested in the stock market, if you withdrawl the money, you pay higher taxes. This money was already taxed once when you earned now, you put it in the market and pay a meager tax on it. He wants to raise the taxes on any money you earn? Where the hell is this fair? Why do you want to invest? The concept behind Bush's Tax Cuts (for the wealthy as others say) meant that people who had money in a savings account could invest that money into the stock market with less risk because of lower taxes. With the Tax Cuts, we saw the Stock Market take off. Raise this tax, you'll see the stock market drop at a good pace because no one wants to pay higher taxes on money they saved and risked in the stock market. The risk is too great to invest in the market if you're getting taxed higher on it!
Most importantly, raising the CGT will effect the retired people who have all their money in the stock market and have annuities on it, or have a 401k. You have to pay taxes on the money you pull out for retirement, meaning we effectively have raised taxes on our Baby Boomer generation, giving them less money, all the while Obama wants to re-evaluate and help out the Baby Boombers with more social security?! This does not make sense.

Universal Medical care is a joke. Ask a socialogy student or psychology student and they learn immediately that if you give someone something for free, it will be abused. On paper, everyone having medical coverage from the Government is great. But you and I with Benefits don't rush into the hospital that much and when we do, we pay. If its free, how many people are going to rush into the hospital and abuse it? X amount of money might be set aside from these expenses, but we don't know how many people are going to use it nor how many people are going to abuse it. Thus, taxes will get increased to pay this bill. People will abuse it and run up the bill because its free, or exceedingly cheap for them to use. This is not a good idea.
Though, if this path is taken, I would propose that individuals get 1-2 'free' or cheap visits to doctors/ER. After that, deducitibles start going up to reduce people from abusing it. If you have to pay, you're less likely to abuse the system, thus give people 1-2 ER visits a year to reduce people from abusing it.

Obama is an elitist. He is out of touch with the working middle class and the retired. On his perch, he looks down past the middle class and looks towards the people who would benefit the most by him giving them something, giving them 'Hope' that they will have it easier under them. Unfortuantely, he's not telling them they need to work for it. No, he's telling the rest of America that "we need to feel the hurt" along with them. Well, I've felt the hurt and I worked so I wouldn't be there. I believe everyone has this option to improve their life. Opportunties are everywhere to create a better life for you. The less you have, the less you have holding yourself back from improving your life. Mr. BomberBill himself once said on this very forum that he had lost everything. His exact quote was, "A man with nothing to lose is no longer blind." Those who claim to have nothing should have the vision to have anything they want. No jobs in your area? Move. You have nothing to lose and everything to gain. Its when you have everything to lose that this doesn't work. Obama does not recognize this in his inexperience in working through the ranks. He's a politician and a smooth talker.

I think he's an overall great guy and compassionate, but I don't believe he understands the effects of what he proposes. It may work in isolated places like Chicago. On a national level, this will not work. His experiences are based on working in and around Chicago. He has no experience outside of that view. He lacks a National Vision to improve this country due to his cookie cutter approach to what may have helped Chicago's inner city youth.

Many things Obama stand for are vague and weak in concept when checked into. He's not ready to be President due to his far too optimistic outlook and lack of a realistic approach. This is a man who is basically promising this country the World; something we have absolutely no right to.

I personally will be voting for McCain. I'm not the biggest supporter of him but I respect the fact that he's the straightest talker of the three and he has the best economic approach for this country. He's the only guy who really has any experience in an economy. Hillary and Obama both lack experience in dealing with an economy but both of them have experience in Giving to the less fortunate while giving the finger to everyone else.

I heard a quote on Friday. "If you're a Republican at the age of 20, you have no heart. If you're a Democrat at age 40, you have no brains."

Let it be known that more than once I've been told on this forum that I lack compassion for others in a less than fortunate. I can because I sat in that position at one point too and I made the choices to make my life and I'll be damned if I'm going to support Obama or Hillary in giving my work away to someone unworthy of my efforts!

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by Riser on 05-05-2008 at 05:42:10 PM
------------------------------ "Alcoholism is a disease, but it's the only one you can get yelled at for having. Goddammit Otto, you are an alcoholic. Goddammit Otto, you have Lupus... one of those two doesn't sound right." M. H.
Reply to Riser
- 0 +

All politicians are out of touch with the working middle class.

Reply to Anoobis
- 0 +

Good Economic proposals from McCain:

John McCain Will Cut Taxes For Middle Class Families. John McCain will permanently repeal the Alternative Minimum Tax(AMT) – a tax that will be paid nearly exclusively by 25 million middle class families. Repealing this onerous tax will save middle class families nearly $60 billion in a single year. Under McCain's plan, a middle class family with children set to pay the AMT will save an average of over $2,700 – a real tax cut for working families.

John McCain Will Keep Tax Rates Low. Entrepreneurs are at the heart of American innovation, growth and prosperity. They create the ultimate job security – a new, better opportunity if your current job goes away. Entrepreneurs should not be taxed into submission. John McCain will maintain the current income and investment tax rates and fight the Democrats' plans for a crippling tax increase in 2011. Left to their devices, Democrats will impose a massive $100 billion tax hike, almost $700 per taxpayer every year. John McCain has also long sought permanent and immediate reform of the estate tax, and supports raising the exemption from taxation on estates up to $10 million while cutting the tax rate to 15 percent.

John McCain Will Reward Saving, Investment And Risk-Taking. Low taxes on dividends and capital gains promote saving, channel investment dollars to innovative, high-value uses and not wasteful financial planning. John McCain will keep the current rates on dividends and capital gains and fight anti-growth efforts by Democrats.


John McCain Will Reduce The Federal Corporate Tax Rate To 25 Percent From 35 Percent. John McCain believes the taxes we impose on American companies should be no higher than the average rate our major trading partners impose on theirs. We currently have the second-highest combined corporate-tax rate in the industrialized world, and it is driving many businesses and the jobs they create overseas

John McCain Proposes A One-Year Spending Pause To Evaluate Programs. He believes that outside of essential military and veterans programs there should be a one-year pause in discretionary spending growth that should be used for a top-to-bottom review of the effectiveness of federal programs. (Not going to happen but...)

Bad ideas:

John McCain Believes We Should Institute A Summer Gas Tax Holiday. Hard-working American families are suffering from higher gasoline prices. John McCain calls on Congress to suspend the 18.4 cent federal gas tax and 24.4 cent diesel tax from Memorial Day to Labor Day.

John McCain Will Stop Filling The Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) To Reduce Demand. International demand for oil is bolstered by federal purchases for the SPR. There is no reason to fill it when oil is so expensive, the overall SPR is of adequate size, and when it places further upward pressure on prices.



Compare that to Hillary or Obama and McCain would be the most in touch of the three.

------------------------------ "Alcoholism is a disease, but it's the only one you can get yelled at for having. Goddammit Otto, you are an alcoholic. Goddammit Otto, you have Lupus... one of those two doesn't sound right." M. H.
Reply to Riser
- 0 +

I don't have much of an issue with McCain but I don't believe cutting the corporate federal tax rate is going to help the economy out that much. It's not a bad idea and I'm sure some good will come of it but I just don't trust companies to utilize it in a way that would be beneficial to the U.S.

 

It appears as if companies emphasize more on their short term (and sighted) gains than their overall long term ones. They only care about wringing out as much quarterly profit as possible with little regard to the effects and repercussions it will have on the country and economy as a whole. The past few administrations have made it not just attractive to send jobs overseas, but standard practice. Anything and everything that can be outsourced can, has and will be. Easing taxes on them will not stimulate anything except their greed and it will not bring jobs back to this economy because there isn't any incentive to have them here. I myself am pretty certain that McCain was not thinking of middle America when he proposed this idea.

 

The U.S. is nothing but a consumer now and the little industry that does remain here struggles because of an economy that doesn't support itself anymore.

 

I too think the idea of the placing a hold on the gas tax is stupid. It's nothing but an empty political gesture to give people a false sense that McCain or Clinton want to help them. Ditto for a halt on filling the strategic reserve. Obama, does not support the Summer Gas Tax "holiday" (last time I checked).


Message edited by Anoobis on 05-05-2008 at 08:46:15 PM
Reply to Anoobis
- 0 +

I don't think the Summer Holiday tax thing by McCain was truly meant to be put money in people's pockets but to show how much money the government makes off each gallon of gas.

But I really do believe in cutting tax rates for businesses. I mean, they're 35% right now which is insane. Besides that, American companies are (I think) the highest (if not in the top) taxed in the world.

Cutting the taxes on them will allow them to reinvest and create jobs.

If anyone caught the news with the interview of the Shell Oil presient or some high up.. he said everyone is bitching about big oil making windfall profits and all this and that.
He came out with the numbers... even on their billions of dollars of sales, they only make 7 1/2% profit. That's ok business, not great but definately not horrible. My company is looking to do 15% consistently per year. These numbers are accurate due to the government even checking into to the numbers with them.. so its not up for dispute that they're faking the numbers.

Drop the taxes on the businesses to give them more money and allow them to hire more people. Having such high taxes is the incentive to go over seas where you can pay someone less and take the bite away from the high taxes. If you're getting taxed at 35% and have to pay someone an American wage (against an Indian/Chinese one) you slash the profitability of the company.

Drop the taxes and companies should be able to reduce or hold off on inflation of their prices which will help the economy out tremendously. But once a price is set, a company won't back down. It will slow inflation though.

------------------------------ "Alcoholism is a disease, but it's the only one you can get yelled at for having. Goddammit Otto, you are an alcoholic. Goddammit Otto, you have Lupus... one of those two doesn't sound right." M. H.
Reply to Riser
- 0 +

Yes, they are high and yes I think some good will come of it. The problem is that that tax cut will not be enough to offset the fact that they will still lose money by hiring here even after the tax cut. That tax cut will only widen their profit margins because the current mindset does not support taking a loss if it meant bringing back jobs to the U.S. I think a majority of them will just take the tax cut, and then carry on like they have been, i.e. going elsewhere on the cheap than investing locally. It's too bad making a requirement of expanding business locally in the U.S. to be able to qualify for the better tax rate couldn't be implemented but I just don't see something like that working. Sounds great on paper in simplified form but I doubt they could actually enforce it and make it work.

Somehow I don't think a 2008 first-quarter $9.08 billion profit makes me feel sorry taxing Shell. Lowering any taxes on the oil industry will only increase their profits more. Based on their past practices, they show no signs of offering a savings to the consumer when given the option to. They'll simply keep the change.

------------------------------ I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates who said, "I drank what?"[/Chris Knight]
You know what ole Jack Burton says at a time like this? Ole Jack says...what the hell[/Jack Burton]

This forum format sucks. Bring back the old one.
Reply to Anoobis

Riser wrote :

The only thing I like about Obama is that he's making so many promises he can't keep. IF he should by reason of stup



I find it interesting that so many of us repeat the same thought process every election. It’s almost as if we forget the outcome every time. I’m not a republican or a democrat. I’m not a fan of universal healthcare either. I’m interested in deeper things than surface claims. To be honest, there are many claims each candidate has made which I don’t support, but to break things down the way you have… I can’t agree with that method. This is not a math problem where you can add this to that and get a result. A candidate is not made of promises and claims only. A candidate is a person who is influenced by all the same things you and I are.

While I try not to ever impose my opinion, I will say this; it doesn’t matter if the next president is a democrat or a republican. What matters is that he or she cares about people. THAT is at the core, from where will and intention stem. THAT is what determines whether he or she will do things that help you and me. If he or she is not a caring person, many will always suffer, as has been the case.


Message edited by scamtrOn on 05-05-2008 at 10:38:40 PM
Reply to scamtrOn
- 0 +

JustPlainJef wrote :

Front line grunts making $30K. ENGINEERS making $100K. That sounds about right...

What do the high ranking generals over there make a year?

You know what, don't answer that, or anything else.

Ever.






heheh thats funy, as an e-5 i make about 35k doing network **** in comm, right? the civie contractors over here doing the same job make about 120K... does that sound about right?

no but you have to remember what this boils down to. you cant pay one e-5 something and someone else who is an e-5 in a different career field something completely different, this would totally break down the whole structure system involved with rank as well as lower morale much less cause bickering betwixt those of the same rank but one gets paid more so they are "more special"

does it suck? yes... but i think it is needed.

[/one mans point of view]

------------------------------ "For years my dad struggled with alcoholism, I have perfected it."
"Lonely once the drugs are gone, I feel like..."
Roll Tide!

 

Reply to mrface

Yeah, but you get free bullets.

Reply to Tom_Smart
- 0 +

:(

------------------------------ "For years my dad struggled with alcoholism, I have perfected it."
"Lonely once the drugs are gone, I feel like..."
Roll Tide!

 

Reply to mrface

- 0 +

Well at least you don't work for Best Buy Geek Squad. Either you would kill your co-workers, your boss, the customers, blow up the store or just do all the aforementioned actions.

Are you back home?

------------------------------ Doctor Hooter
Boobs Boobs Boobs...who loves boobs?...I do I do

 

Reply to zpyrd

- 0 +

mugz wrote :

Meritocratic dictatorship is the only way. F* democracy. F* communism. Both do not take human weakness into account. Both are failures.

Thank you.




Wait a sec, isnt that kinda contrary to your dads book??

------------------------------ http://i249.photobucket.com/albums/gg233/turpit/SIG2A.jpg
Reply to turpit
- 0 +

Let's just say, the Second Coming isn't going to be the hippy-drippy all is forgiven fest that people think it's gonna be.

------------------------------ http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html - I WISH PEOPLE WOULD APPLY THIS!
Reply to mugz
- 0 +

Well that kind of sucks.
Can't we have a BBQ party and all just get along.

------------------------------ Doctor Hooter
Boobs Boobs Boobs...who loves boobs?...I do I do

 

Reply to zpyrd

- 0 +

Depends who gets BBQ'd.

------------------------------ http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html - I WISH PEOPLE WOULD APPLY THIS!
Reply to mugz

@Rise - Free healthcare is not as bad an idea as you seem to think. The general idea is to maintain the health of your working population which should increase national productivity and reduce dependance on state aid. Yes it can be abused but over in the UK we have the National Insitution for Clinical Excelence (NICE) which has to cost benefit analysis all drugs and treatments provided by the system. Now I can't say they get it right all the time but in general they keep it in the right direction.

Yes, people can abuse it big style and there are some things that the NHS offer that I don't think they should. People have the option of private health care if they want it but at present can not opt out of the state system. Part of the reason for this is that all A&E services are provided by the state. They do recover some of the expence for this service from insurance. I had to pay a small fee ~£50 some years back when I was in a car crash. The cost was picked up by the insurer of the person that drove into us.

Reply to audiovoodoo

BAH to taxes...

------------------------------ No more promise no more sorrow,
No longer will I follow.
Can anybody hear me?
I just want to be me.
Reply to JustPlainJef

** removes schools, streets, police force and armed services **

You were saying...

Reply to audiovoodoo

I never said I wouldn't pay my taxes. I just said I didn't like them.

I understand what they are used for, but damn, do they suck...

------------------------------ No more promise no more sorrow,
No longer will I follow.
Can anybody hear me?
I just want to be me.
Reply to JustPlainJef

Try VAT at 17.5% on all goods and then tell me about tax!

Reply to audiovoodoo

No thanks.

...*resumes bitching about tax*...

------------------------------ No more promise no more sorrow,
No longer will I follow.
Can anybody hear me?
I just want to be me.
Reply to JustPlainJef
- 0 +

Anoobis wrote :

Somehow I don't think a 2008 first-quarter $9.08 billion profit makes me feel sorry taxing Shell. Lowering any taxes on the oil industry will only increase their profits more. Based on their past practices, they show no signs of offering a savings to the consumer when given the option to. They'll simply keep the change.



9 Billion is 7.9% profit. Why should oil companies doing regular business get hit harder than any other business that's pulling in 8% profits? I don't care how much money they make as long as its in relation to their sales. Yes, its a huge amount of money but that doesn't mean it should be taxed more.
Also keep in mind this country hasn't build a refinery since the mid to late '70s. The refineries are now putting out 88-98% max production daily in order to sustain current levels of gasoline. If gas prices dropped down to $2.50 a gallon, this country would be out of gasoline in a few weeks. Gas prices are based on supply and demand and big oil is actually doing us a favor by increasing prices (holy **** I sound like Glenn Beck!). Prices are going up to keep the supply of gasoline available. If it went down, we'd use and abuse it. Also, China is adding 100,000 cars per week or month to their economy, driving up oil prices.

Oil affects everyone.. but a few years back when China was redoing their infrastructure, only contractors and construction businesses were complaining when steel prices went through the roof. No one cared.. now its oil and a lot of people are complaining. We've had it good for too long and its now a world economy.

The moron democrats think taxing big oil is the best way to generate money for their other programs, which would increase gas prices because they do need to sustain a certain amount of profitability.. they are a business, not a money tree. Anyhow, if we want to fix the gasoline prices, we need to build more refineries. Gas won't go back down to $1 a gallon but it would drop a lot, revenue from the oil companies would go down, profit % would be the same though. They won't be affected since their profits are consistent to their sales.

I believe McCain supports exploration in ANWR (or whatever the acronym is) which I agree with. It won't solve the middle east energy problem right now but it sure as hell will limit the amount of money going over that way. The money would stay in the US and hopefully give us a good amount of time to let technology figure out the best way away from oil.

Quick math: First quarter, they paid $3 billion in taxes alone. $3 billion in taxes, $9 billion in profit. I'm all for that. That's how businesses need to run.. they have to make money somehow to sustain. Plus they have to be able to buy oil in the futures with prices going up. Oil prices go up, they can't rely on yesterday's price to buy tomorrow's oil. That's why you see gas prices flucuating so quickly. The money you spend at the pump that gets back to them will go right back to buying oil. If they didn't adjust like that, they would be losing money and most likely would be the exact same position the Airlines are in.


@Audio

Quote :

Rise - Free healthcare is not as bad an idea as you seem to think. The general idea is to maintain the health of your working population which should increase national productivity and reduce dependance on state aid. Yes it can be abused but over in the UK we have the National Insitution for Clinical Excelence (NICE) which has to cost benefit analysis all drugs and treatments provided by the system. Now I can't say they get it right all the time but in general they keep it in the right direction.



I don't beleive it is the government's role to provide health care. Walk into UPS or FedEx in America and you can ship a package in 5 minutes. Walk into USPS and try shipping a package. You'll be there all day and tomorrow. I don't want them running my healthcare. :)

I would be for the government offering select health care. My friend's mom can't get health insurance because she has a severe disease that no one wants to cover because of the pre-existing condition. She also does not work since her divorce and she's very well paid in alimony for the rest of her life.

Its not hard to get health insurance in the US. Go deliver pizzas and you get health insurance. Actually, just get a job outside of the restaurant industry and most places will give you health insurance. Yeah, it might cost you $100 a month (I pay $30 or $60 a month, don't pay attention) but you still have health insurance. Its cheaper. You can go with your own insurance for abotu $130 a month. If you need it that bad, you can afford to pay that amount. Hell, its the price most people are paying for their cell phones. You'll see someone with the best f'ing cell phone but they can't afford health insurance. Priorities are fubar in this Country.

If you get a good job, you'll get health insurance. If you don't have health insurance, any health insurance is better than none. Aside rom that, I strongly believe health insurance should be an incentive for people to be a productive member of society.

Small businesses should be able to get better health insurance prices though.. but that's something the market dictates. If the government takes over, now I have my tax money going to pay for that crap. Canada has insane taxes. I go drink a beer up there and I have to pay like $0.30 extra on beer on top of their already what? 30% taxes or something? I had a few drinks up there a couple months ago and my bill was $81. It would have been about $45 in the States but those taxes are way too high.

For the longest time America didn't even have an income tax (Thanks FDR but it worked out). The government should focus on infrastructure, military, and stuff along those lines. It should not have a direct impact on my day to day living. Let the States figure out their own health care system if they want - not at the Federal level. This country is too large, too diverse for a blanket system to go into place on something as volitile as the health care industry. Federal law can make a Federal Speed Limit. That's easy. Health care isn't and should remain a public service.

------------------------------ "Alcoholism is a disease, but it's the only one you can get yelled at for having. Goddammit Otto, you are an alcoholic. Goddammit Otto, you have Lupus... one of those two doesn't sound right." M. H.
Reply to Riser

Give me a few more weeks and I might join you on that one. At the moment I'm loving the redirection of Strangests tax bill to my benefits payments ;)

Reply to audiovoodoo

@Rise - You really are a cold heartless capitalist mother focker. [/I suspect you will take that as a compliment.]

Reply to audiovoodoo

get a Job hippy.

------------------------------ I'm a git, deal with it.

Antec 1200,PC Power & Cooling 750,Gigabyte DS4-x48,Intel Q9550@3.4 W/Xigmatek S1283,8GB OCZ DDR2 800,ATI 4870X2,X-FI>CA 640C amp>Tannoy R300/Senn 595's
Reply to strangestranger

I am working on it... honest! £60 per week is really starting to piss me off :(

Reply to audiovoodoo
Previous
1 2
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Old Man/Woman's Club > Other > Obama
Go to:

There are 1340 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them