Network webcams

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.webcam (More info?)

In message <Y_SdnUADH7OHI6nfRVn-oQ@comcast.com>, yuki
<notread_news@comcast.net> writes
>I am looking to get a consumer grade (ie. ~$200) network (Ethernet-enabled)
>webcam. It maybe wired or wireless.
>I found the following models on the web:
>o Veo Observer
>o Linksys WVC54G (wireless)
>o DLink DCS-950G (wireless)
>
>I suppose Logitech QuickCam Pro 4000 is still the best for image quality at
>this level.
>How do thise I mentioned compare to the Logitech unit?
>
>TIA
>
>
>
Linksys WVc54G at www.cluer.com/linksyscam
--

-- -------------------------------------------------------------------- --
Graham Cluer | Email: news1 <at> cluer <dot> com

(If replying by e-mail please make the above into a legal email address)
==========================================================================

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.webcam (More info?)

"Graham Cluer" <n@x.x> wrote in message news:ze6anzCj+vNCFwsm@cluer.com...
> In message <Y_SdnUADH7OHI6nfRVn-oQ@comcast.com>, yuki
> <notread_news@comcast.net> writes
> >I am looking to get a consumer grade (ie. ~$200) network
(Ethernet-enabled)
> >webcam. It maybe wired or wireless.
> >I found the following models on the web:
> >o Veo Observer
> >o Linksys WVC54G (wireless)
> >o DLink DCS-950G (wireless)
> >
> >I suppose Logitech QuickCam Pro 4000 is still the best for image quality
at
> >this level.
> >How do thise I mentioned compare to the Logitech unit?
> >
> >TIA
> >
> >
> >
> Linksys WVc54G at www.cluer.com/linksyscam
> --
>
> -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- --
> Graham Cluer | Email: news1 <at> cluer <dot> com
>
> (If replying by e-mail please make the above into a legal email address)
> ==========================================================================

How about an Axis 205? It has a very-low-compression setting which will
*probably* allow it to outperform any USB1 webcam. It outperforms a Philips
Toucam Pro in daylight conditions, see
http://www.setters.demon.co.uk/lundycam/gallery.html (Toucam on left, Axis
205 on right).

Regards,

Simon

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.webcam (More info?)

very cool simon. i'm working on moding my 3com webcam soon.
http://home.rochester.rr.com/ducksauce/web/tv.html





"Simon Shearn" <simon@sgurr.theredwire.co.uk> wrote in message
news:4238aa4d$0$38044$bed64819@news.gradwell.net...
> "Graham Cluer" <n@x.x> wrote in message news:ze6anzCj+vNCFwsm@cluer.com...
>> In message <Y_SdnUADH7OHI6nfRVn-oQ@comcast.com>, yuki
>> <notread_news@comcast.net> writes
>> >I am looking to get a consumer grade (ie. ~$200) network
> (Ethernet-enabled)
>> >webcam. It maybe wired or wireless.
>> >I found the following models on the web:
>> >o Veo Observer
>> >o Linksys WVC54G (wireless)
>> >o DLink DCS-950G (wireless)
>> >
>> >I suppose Logitech QuickCam Pro 4000 is still the best for image quality
> at
>> >this level.
>> >How do thise I mentioned compare to the Logitech unit?
>> >
>> >TIA
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> Linksys WVc54G at www.cluer.com/linksyscam
>> --
>>
>> -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- --
>> Graham Cluer | Email: news1 <at> cluer <dot> com
>>
>> (If replying by e-mail please make the above into a legal email address)
>> ==========================================================================
>
> How about an Axis 205? It has a very-low-compression setting which will
> *probably* allow it to outperform any USB1 webcam. It outperforms a
> Philips
> Toucam Pro in daylight conditions, see
> http://www.setters.demon.co.uk/lundycam/gallery.html (Toucam on left, Axis
> 205 on right).
>
> Regards,
>
> Simon
>
>