http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?s=313e1061185e467c6dba9a706fb3a715&t=124782
8)
THG over clocked a P4 past 5ghz
edit:
http://www.tomshardware.com/2003/12/30/5_ghz_project/ <-- proof
These are 2 totally different processors. The Pentiums could clock better due to the longer pipeline. A Pentium can go past 7 Ghz.
This was done on cascade(phase-change)..not LN2 like Coolaler and others were using. Very good result.http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=59753
X6800: coolaler - 5525.89 MHz 8)
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?s=313e1061185e467c6dba9a706fb3a715&t=124782
8)
JumpingJack said:
The assumption that Core 2 will hit clocks as high as a P4 is not quite correct. P4 has 31 stages (a very deep pipeline), Core 2 is 14 stages, so it should not clock as high as well as P4 --- of course IPC between the two is night and day.
Overclocking the core 2 duo is a little harder than the P4 and takes a little skill to hit those high GHz.
with 14 stages that explains why its harder to stabilize 4Ghz.
the thing I like the best about the Core 2 is the performace gains across the board overclocking even at moderate oc's .
theres no comparison over the P4.
THG over clocked a P4 past 5ghz
edit:
http://www.tomshardware.com/2003/12/30/5_ghz_project/ <-- proof