Cnut has been captured and not a word about him mentioned on here all day. Not even Pike tried to big up his beloved UN for only taking twelve years to catch the cnut.

In other more important news, Liverpool play Hertha Berlin in a friendly tonight.[/no really]

as i have said in another thread, there is no UN, just UN members.

also, who cares, tons of people massacre or organise the massacring of people and we don't see this hoohah.

SS: You're a fcuktard.

Tom: Yeah, I saw that last night on TV but they only did a couple minute run on him before they switched over to something far more important apparently: a cuffed detainee getting shot with a rubber bullet. fcuking p*ssy.

and why would i be fcuktard. i was simply stating facts.

So was he!























Sorry, that was way too easy.....

I have very little to no respect for the law. I do respect human life. 8373 dead in Srebrenica just isn't funny.

TS, link.....


No joke there.

These two guys created this website called Google... maybe you've heard of it?

I hate it when Riser is right.

hmm, we are opposites aren't we tom. numbers on a screen here. if you piled them up so i could get as sense of scale then it might help but just numbers even then.

now, seeing as how many innocent people the brits and the yanks have been responsible for, are bush, blair and now brown also going to be hunted down as some of the worlds most dangerous men?

Say what you like about Bush, Blair et al, but they didn't sign off on mass murdering women and children, setting fire to their remains and them dumping them in a ditch.

I got up close and personal with some of this cnut's militia, saw their fcuking handiwork. Believe me, a hangman's noose is what this bastard deserves.

Several times the Brits had this fcuker lined up and the IFOR brass refused to sign off on it. I'd make the fcuker stand amongst the dead, then slot him.

Yes, I'm all for that.

And the Dutch fcukers who stood by and done nothing.[/Biggie baiting]

obviously it is not what people do but how that matters to some people. the result is the same if not worse as when it is us it is alright. sorry, but double standards piss me off and our whole history stinks of them.

I can just about believe you're stupid enough to think more of animal welfare than that of your fellow man. I refuse to believe you actually think killing one person, for whatever reason, is no different than ordering the destruction of an entire race for political gain.

Riser is the forum's button-pusher around here. You are just taking the piss or are seriously mentally ill.

The biggest mass genocide since WWII. Double standards? You've got to be kidding. Show me one example of where British forces have walked into a village, dragged out every man woman and child of a certain race or creed and murdered them just for that. Even in some of the darkest days of the Empire, we never stooped that low.

Professional soldiers, as a whole, would not and couldn't not. You get the odd nutter, every army has one, but he soon gets pulled back into line or kicked out. Karadzic and Mladic seemed to only employ nutters. They loved their work, the sick fcukers.

uhm, lets see, RAF, WWII. like i say, it appears the how is more important than the what.

also, give me a little time and i am sure i can come up with evidence of exactly that situation, then again, history favours those who write it.

The bombing of Dresden wasn't exactly our finest hour.

The why is more important than the how. Nobody here is suggesting that had any of the previously mentioned genocides been carried out in a, and obviously I'm stretching a point here, humane manner that we'd feel better about them.

I don't suppose many of Harold Shipman's victims felt a thing. Does that make him less of a monster? Does it fcuk.

WTF is wrong with you?

maybe there is something wrong with me that i cannot connect with what some people consider atrocities. i am well aware that they are wrong but i do not feel anything about them. i would have to see it for myself.

seeing as i do not care about one, i do not care about all is my way. however, i do not give preference to one over the other which too many do.

sorry, you are asking of me something that i cannot give, compassion.

Fair enough. I still stand by my point that if you are incapable of compassion for your fellow man, you are mentally ill. Probably a very simple case of being a simpleton. You can feel compassion and have stated that you do, albeit only for animals. Saying you can't feel it is just bollocks.

I'm still waiting for you to show a case of British forces marching into a village and killing every man woman and child based solely on race.

Post WWII history, don't start with the imperialist bollocks we all know we got up to in the past.

hmm, post WWII, hmm. i'll have a dig about. we ain't done as much pillaging as we used to since then.

Also, dipshite, bombing a village during a war is a lot different than marching into a village and killing people.

Whether or not you feel anything for the people he killed, you should still be able to see that this guy is a nimrod...