Tom's Hardware > Forum > Old Man/Woman's Club > Other > The point of Tanks in war? what is it?
Page:    Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Bottom Search this thread
Word :    Username :           
 

I applied to the Canadian Army as an Armored Soldier. If all goes well, I may be operating a Leopard 2A6, "best tank in the world" (Not as field tested though).

Question is, why do we still use tanks in warfare? There are hundreds of weapons capable of destroying them, they are priority targets, have no defensive measures to planes...

what is the point in operating a tank, its basically driving around in a metal coffin that screams "Hey, use anti tank mines on me! bomb me from above! use them bullets that pierce through our armor and create shrapnel on the other side!"

Im really regretting my decision on an Armored soldier. I'd much rather be an infantry soldier, survivability is probably much higher when it comes to an actual full out war.

If anyone can tell me now that tanks are still useful, and aren't as fragile as everyone says, then ill feel better

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Based on the risks you've just described, I'd rather like you to join a tank regiment.

Reply to WingDing

Tanks do have defenses. First is the armour itself. Second is in the form of Chaff/flares/decoys...missile/tracking system decoys. Third are some 'active' systems. You'll find out about those after youve screened, joined and trained

Fourth,and most important is "mutual support" You dont send a tank out alone. Ever. Unless you dont want it back. Its goes as part of an armoured column which includes anti air defenses, for example this nasty little albeit older piece of work, The ZSU 23 shilha,
http://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/row/zsu-23-4.htm
The shilka defends the tanks and infantry from air threats, while the tanks and infantry "mutually support" the shilkas by protecting them from ground based threats
http://home.quicknet.nl/qn/prive/lm.broers/picswar1/zsu234.jpg

MANPADS and the SA16...more 'tank anti air defenses'

http://www.fas.org/programs/ssp/asmp/MANPADS.html
http://www.kbm.ru/en/product/manpads/igla


As for the tank itself:

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/direct.htm

Quote :

The entire purpose of the tank is to carry the main gun into battle. The armor is provided to ensure that the crew is protected from shrapnel (the main cause of battlefield casualties) and small arms fire. The crew exists solely to serve the main gun. The driver gets the vehicle to firing position, the tank commander selects targets, the loader ensures the weapon is loaded with the correct ammunition for the target selected, and the gunner makes sure the round strikes the target in the area of maximum vulnerability.



Every piece of equipment has its role to play. Its not the tanks job to defend itself from air threats. If you start modifiying that tank too extensively, to counter the airthreat and turn it into a 'jack of all trades', one of 2 things happen.

Option 1) you wind up with something like this:

http://www.lonesentry.com/articles/maus/index.html

http://www.tankmuseum.ru/images/pav6-9.jpg
http://www.czolgiem.com/niemcy/foto/maus%201.jpg
or this
http://johnsmilitaryhistory.com/t28b.jpg


Something that is so heavy that its weight presents not only a problem to mobility, but presents problems to the structure/mechanism itself, and winds up being so slow and unruley, that it is essentially useless.

Option 2) you keep the size down, but the you have to reduce other capabilities to make room for the 'new' stuff

Option 3). You surrender your noobself to the mugz for a llama suiting to be promptly followed by a wingdinging.

Option 4) you resist and make the wingingding that much more painful



------------------------------ http://i249.photobucket.com/albums/gg233/turpit/SIG2A.jpg
Reply to turpit

Wow, that is very informative. Thank you for that. I guess I was thinking to linearly.

Sounds like a tank is a strong force, only when backed up heavily with support. But thats what the armys about right, teamwork.

thanks, now i can discuss this information with some family to make them feel a bit more comfortable with that fact.

Reply to sacre

Don't forget 90% of all tank folk die in training.[/tanked]

------------------------------ +35 Wingding approval points +10 Scouse approval +22 Mammary Manipulation
+5 Comedy +15 Belated Holy Points +5 Messianic Approval + 5 penile innovation
+13 Baked Ham creativity +65 Obscure Quote

Reply to KingLoftusXII

http://www.safetycenter.navy.mil/media/posters/posterimages/tank.jpg

------------------------------ http://i249.photobucket.com/albums/gg233/turpit/SIG2A.jpg
Reply to turpit

Hopefully you'll get to clean the barrel during a live fire exercise..

------------------------------ These forumz screwed up my sig...
+42 not give a shyte points...
Reply to _WW_

"hey, it doesn't look dirty"

"shove your head in to get a better look"

------------------------------ I'm a git, deal with it.

Antec 1200,PC Power & Cooling 750,Gigabyte DS4-x48,Intel Q9550@3.4 W/Xigmatek S1283,8GB OCZ DDR2 800,ATI 4870X2,X-FI>CA 640C amp>Tannoy R300/Senn 595's
Reply to Strangestranger

Pile On the Poor, Ill-informed Hippie Dept.
What Turpit wrote and, of course, that engagements are still about occupying real estate-- that means boots on the ground-- that means having armor to take, occupy, and defend positions. Armor is still a great show of strength regardless of its uh "usefullness"

Reply to dwellman

if tanks fired daisies less people would die

Reply to pike

pike wrote :

if tanks fired daisies less people would die


Oh FFS pike ...

------------------------------
The Edge... There is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over. - HST

Reply to Jake_Barnes

absolute classic, peace \/ pike.

------------------------------ I'm a git, deal with it.

Antec 1200,PC Power & Cooling 750,Gigabyte DS4-x48,Intel Q9550@3.4 W/Xigmatek S1283,8GB OCZ DDR2 800,ATI 4870X2,X-FI>CA 640C amp>Tannoy R300/Senn 595's
Reply to Strangestranger

Don't encourage him, forchristsakes :non:

------------------------------
The Edge... There is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over. - HST

Reply to Jake_Barnes

pike wrote :

if tanks fired daisies less people would die



Yes Pike, and while we're at it, lets refit the B-52's to drop heavenly scented marigolds on everyone. :sarcastic:

Fcuks sake, I've heard some sh!t in my time......

------------------------------ 'Out of the abyss I come the avenger
shapeless and faceless - Yet I have a name,
I shall tighten my grip on your now flawed creation,
endeavour to show you the meaning of pain.'
Reply to RobD

imagine if every army, officer and soldier decided to do just that...........send all soldiers back home to be really "productive" to society and transform army coumpounds into low cost shelters for low income families. Refit War ships into luxury liners and aircraft carriers offering tourist jet flights.

Submarines could be refitted as research vessels to study the state of the oceans and ocean life.

Nuclear balistic missiles can have their payloads changed for toys with small parachutes to be sent all over the world on christmass night

Reply to pike

Oh yes, and then the next day we can wake up with russians and Chinese soldiers sitting in our backyard with a beer saying "Thanks for your land"

Reply to sacre

i meant ALL armies, soldiers etc etc

Reply to pike

Pike. Take more drugs, the ones you're on at the moment clearly aren't working.

------------------------------ 'Out of the abyss I come the avenger
shapeless and faceless - Yet I have a name,
I shall tighten my grip on your now flawed creation,
endeavour to show you the meaning of pain.'
Reply to RobD

You're an idiot ... it's that simple - just a classic idiot.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by Jake_Barnes on 08-17-2008 at 10:33:15 PM
------------------------------
The Edge... There is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over. - HST

Reply to Jake_Barnes

i say we all join hands and sing.

------------------------------ I'm a git, deal with it.

Antec 1200,PC Power & Cooling 750,Gigabyte DS4-x48,Intel Q9550@3.4 W/Xigmatek S1283,8GB OCZ DDR2 800,ATI 4870X2,X-FI>CA 640C amp>Tannoy R300/Senn 595's
Reply to Strangestranger

Jake_Barnes wrote :

You're an idiot ... it's that simple - just a classic idiot.



which is the bigger idiot, the idiot who takes part in all aspects of war without ever questionning it, or the idiot who risks talking of a reality without war ?

what nation has the most to loose in a world without war? would it be the nation who is gaining the most from actions of war?

It's interesting to see who steps up in protest when any possibility of ending all war is put forward!

Reply to pike

Pike, Insects have war, Mammals have war, reptiles have war. Ever see lemurs man? 2 packs, trying to kill eachother off, day by day, trying to invade eachothers land.

We are animals, We have urges and needs, feelings, etc. To hold hands and be in peace for the rest of eternity, humans would go mad. Its not in ANY creatures nature to just be at peace for the rest of eternity. We are hunters, our bodies are built for hunting, and killing. We were granted powerful brains due to the lack of built on weaponry like sharp fangs, and claws, speed, etc.

Point is, we will always fight, we will always have wars, we will always have disagreements. simply by argueing with your GF/BF, family, etc is basically a war, in a much smaller form.

You want peace on the world, keep dreaming, the most you can do is be polite to all, respect all, so that you will get that same respect back.

Reply to sacre

Pike there are people in the world who are too stupid or too afraid to choose for themselves. They follow idealistic leader who disagrees with anyone with a different appearance or opinion.

If you don't stand up and defend what belongs to you someone will come and take it away.


As for the point of using tanks...they're big, loud and blow $hit up...they instil fear in the enemy.

------------------------------ Doctor Hooter
Boobs Boobs Boobs...who loves boobs?...I do I do

 

Reply to zpyrd

pike wrote :

if tanks fired daisies less people would die



pike wrote :

i meant ALL armies, soldiers etc etc




Im with you Pike.

You talk to the heads of state for China, Russia, Korea and India. I'll talk to the US. We wont stop untill they've all agreed to disarm.















Then, when China, Russia, Korea and India have disarmed, we send in the US Marines with the arms weve secretly hidden, rape, pilage and kill every fukcing living thing, then claim the land/natural resourses for the US.


Message edited by turpit on 08-18-2008 at 06:31:29 AM
------------------------------ http://i249.photobucket.com/albums/gg233/turpit/SIG2A.jpg
Reply to turpit

Actually... I have to agree with Pike on this one. The world would be a better place without guns and what not... kind of boring but better I suppose. Still, not the proper argument to bring up to a guy joining the military though, huh Pike?

Go kick some ass sacre.

Reply to E3210

E3210 wrote :

Actually... I have to agree with Pike on this one. The world would be a better place without guns and what not... kind of boring but better I suppose. Still, not the proper argument to bring up to a guy joining the military though, huh Pike?

Go kick some ass sacre.




Well, if we are going to eliminate the machinations of killing, lets start with the #1 killing machine on the planet. The automobile.



You turn in yours first.

------------------------------ http://i249.photobucket.com/albums/gg233/turpit/SIG2A.jpg
Reply to turpit

Can't. Have to go to the liquor store to pick up cigarettes and ammunition. Maybe after I get back from the drive thru Wendy's.


Message edited by E3210 on 08-18-2008 at 08:02:31 AM
Reply to E3210

pike wrote :

imagine.... bla bla bla

\

War is a part of our existence. If everything was hunky dory then this life would suck, donkey d!ck in fact.

Reply to Vokofpolisiekar

If everything was perfect, humans, individuals will eventually get really bored, and do new things.. things that are illegal for the rush.. then one thing leads to another, and boom.

EVERYONE has had an arguement, a disagreement, etc with another person. so saying what you did, you are contridicting yourself. You argued, you had disagreements, and people in power have that too, but they can do more then scream, call the police, slam the door, etc.

Reply to sacre

Oh come on. We'd have to completely disassemble civilisation and then eradicate humanity and then start again from single-celled organisms to get rid of war, violence, hatred, anger, envy and greed. And even then they'll come back.

Solution: Live your life as best you can. Do unto others as you'd have them do unto you. And don't - ever - act or think in emotion, you'll only embarrass yourself in the end. [/wishes women would apply the last one]

------------------------------ http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html - I WISH PEOPLE WOULD APPLY THIS!
Reply to mugz

...*thinks back to the Simpson's episode where Lisa got them to give up guns*...

They actually did a really good job of explaining why we can't give up all of our guns...

If you eliminate all weapons, then someone who wants to take something will grab a board with a nail through it. Then someone will find a bigger board with a bigger nail, etc etc etc...

Soon, we are back to where we started...

------------------------------ No more promise no more sorrow,
No longer will I follow.
Can anybody hear me?
I just want to be me.
Reply to JustPlainJef

Well,

As long as there are people around that will reach for violent measures to resolve a conflict with someone else, at the very least counter measures have to be available to apply to these people so that they are deterred from using force.

Personally I prefer to use non-violent means only but I do appreciate any cover that is provided to me which allows me to maintain this attitude.

Pike, as sympathetic as it sounds for all of mankind to agree not to use violent means anymore, how do you propose to protect those that believe in peaceful/non violent resolutions of conflicts against those that do not believe (yet)?

Reply to BigMac

I propose that everyone hand over everything to me and I'll take care of it...really, I promise!

------------------------------ These forumz screwed up my sig...
+42 not give a shyte points...
Reply to _WW_

Hello sacre

First off let me say i was mostly joking about the submarines and daisies back there, but in the end it seems it might have had a purpose.

One thing to be aware of is how humans function. We are basically social creatures and therefore we group up and then we conform to the group and blend in. Society does not like opposition. So what i would like to point out is the great majority of the members here are in opposition to the possibility of ending war...all war. But that is just the thoughts, beleifs of a mainstreem group, just as it was not so long ago when the mainstream beleived that the great sailboats of the time would fall off the earth if they ventured too far.

Now sacre, i thank you for your post as it is clear and precise and well written and i'm glad to answer it.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote: "Pike, Insects have war, Mammals have war, reptiles have war. Ever see lemurs man? 2 packs, trying to kill eachother off, day by day, trying to invade eachothers land. "

Answer: Animal behaviour is bound by natural instincts. Scientists admit to not completly understanding all of animal behaviour. It's being discovered that ant societies are far more complex than ever imagined. So these creatures act on instinct, something we don't completly understand, why should we make a parallell between them and us?

Of course we are animals in the sense that our bodies function exactly as other mammals but i'm sure you will agree we do appear to be different in other regards. Not necessarely more important, we have to be carefull with arrogance, but we have dominated and transformed the planet as no other species ever has. However, the question of WHY? beckons itself upon us.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote: "We are animals, We have urges and needs, feelings, etc. To hold hands and be in peace for the rest of eternity, humans would go mad. Its not in ANY creatures nature to just be at peace for the rest of eternity. We are hunters, our bodies are built for hunting, and killing. We were granted powerful brains due to the lack of built on weaponry like sharp fangs, and claws, speed, etc. "

Answer: As far as being animals i'll add this to the above statements. The question to ask yourself is this: "how certain am i that i am nothing more than this body?" to answer this question with personal conviction and not because of what others say you need to have explored it, to have looked into the matter, into yourself, done some earnest soul searching you may say.

Without war the only thing that would go mad is the ego. Perhaps a good example would be this: Can you imagine a family somewhere, anywhere, where the mother and father are deeply in love and have children which they both cheerish profoundly all thought their lives? Can you imagine them being completly unselfish one towards the other and being absolutly supportive to one another?

It may appear as an insurmountable step but extrapolate that to the whole globe...and before the thoughts surge up of fear and seperation...STOP......now you may be aware of the ego-mind....or then again you may not.

The point is, what goes on inside yourself, will reflect onto the outside, onto the outside world. I'll get back to that .

You say in the past we were granted brains to fight against fangs and claws, well that's correct but it was for survival in what was at the time an inhospitable environment for the weal bodied creatures we were. But that was then and now we have evolved. Then we were fighting other species to maintain our survival...that is NOT what war is about today. What war is about today is far different and can be just as easily understood as it can be misunderstood and this is the point i wanted to come back to and will cover your last part of your post.

War has NOT always existed. You musn't mistake war with survival of the species against other species way back then in the time of the cave men.

But war did appear very early and it appeared with man's capacity to gather MORE food than that which he needed in the immediat futur. He began to make reserves of food as described in the oldest records of ancient egyptions and for those so inclined it is also mentionned in the bible but i am not a specialist of that book.

Then what occured remains to this day a deep mystery. GREED appeared. Man began to accumulate more and more from nature well beyond his needs and if you have a good look around you may see that this is what we are up against.

The appearance, the origin of GREED and hense it's explanation is most important in understanding the present state of the world.


peace

:)

Reply to pike

At which point does NEED become GREED?

Discuss.

------------------------------ http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html - I WISH PEOPLE WOULD APPLY THIS!
Reply to mugz

Need becomes greed when you take more than you need to survive comfortably and step on those around you to do it.

------------------------------ No more promise no more sorrow,
No longer will I follow.
Can anybody hear me?
I just want to be me.
Reply to JustPlainJef

Kill all the hippies, then there's no one left to witter such utter bobbins.

------------------------------ 'Out of the abyss I come the avenger
shapeless and faceless - Yet I have a name,
I shall tighten my grip on your now flawed creation,
endeavour to show you the meaning of pain.'
Reply to RobD

JustPlainJef wrote :

Need becomes greed when you take more than you need to survive comfortably and step on those around you to do it.




I agree with that statement and now this question begs to be asked: "What do you need to survive comfortably?"

For Mother Theresa and for Elton John it may not mean the same thing!

Reply to pike

mugz wrote :

At which point does NEED become GREED?

Discuss.




The best answer i can give to that is this:

GREED is keeping to oneself anything that you beleive your neighboor does not NEED and can live without!

Reply to pike

I did not answer the question of WHEN?

The question of when is more difficult to deal with.

The best answer i can give is this:

"The turning point of need versus greed is the same turning point of the appearance of the mis-identification of self, one's identity, with things on the outside. The child learns early he has a name, then that this name may have posessions or things associated with it. But first at this stage of childhood the child goes through an interesting period where he does not yet associate his self with the name but he does associate things with that name and understanding that in itself is a doorway to understanding hwy and how there is so much greed, pain and suffering in the world.


Message edited by pike on 08-18-2008 at 05:01:25 PM
Reply to pike

Holy crap... Someone shoot me.

------------------------------ No more promise no more sorrow,
No longer will I follow.
Can anybody hear me?
I just want to be me.
Reply to JustPlainJef

Better still, someone shoot Pike. Twice. [/KL]

------------------------------ 'Out of the abyss I come the avenger
shapeless and faceless - Yet I have a name,
I shall tighten my grip on your now flawed creation,
endeavour to show you the meaning of pain.'
Reply to RobD

JustPlainJef wrote :

Need becomes greed when you take more than you need to survive comfortably and step on those around you to do it.



I disagree with the "to survive comfortably" part, that will just lead to stagnation. You need to take as much that you need to survive, and part of survival is that you need to take as much that it will allow for growth as well. Not per se growth of personal wealth but growth of the person in the mental sense. Stagnation is equal to extinction (in an evolutionary sense as well as as an individual sense)

That is what makes it so hard to determine where the boundary of need vs greed actually is (for normal, healthy people)...

Reply to BigMac

Can GIVING make for growth of the person in the mental sense?

Reply to pike

I'm sorry. What's going on? Oh. Pike's trolling again.

Conflict is a symptom of unequal "distribution" of freedom (I use the term distribution, loosley as in that such a thing is not distibuted, but earned).

As in the most often quoted: "Peace is not the absence of war, but the presence of justice."

Reply to dwellman

pike wrote :

Can GIVING make for growth of the person in the mental sense?

In simple terms, yes. Regular giving or tithing is believed by many to be an integral part of financial health, and where there's sound financial health, there can be some impact on physical, mental, and spiritual health.

------------------------------ Do you not know that in a race all the runners run, but only one gets the prize? Run in such a way as to get the prize.
PRs:
-5K: 24:29
-10K: 53:50
Reply to dwellman

BigMac wrote :

I disagree with the "to survive comfortably" part, that will just lead to stagnation. You need to take as much that you need to survive, and part of survival is that you need to take as much that it will allow for growth as well. Not per se growth of personal wealth but growth of the person in the mental sense. Stagnation is equal to extinction (in an evolutionary sense as well as as an individual sense)

That is what makes it so hard to determine where the boundary of need vs greed actually is (for normal, healthy people)...


When I said comfortably, I meant just enough to keep you satisfied. If you need to drink 5 gallons of water a week, and you take 4, you can survive. I think the greed would kick in somewhere above the 5 gallon point. Depending on the water rations, maybe you get 5, maybe you get 7. If you need 5 and steal from your neighbors to get 10, that would be greed.

------------------------------ No more promise no more sorrow,
No longer will I follow.
Can anybody hear me?
I just want to be me.
Reply to JustPlainJef

if you need to drink 5 gallons of water a week to be satisfied and you use 255 because you water the lawn to get it nice and green like the neighbors' and you wash your car on sunday to get it nice and shiny for the night out at the restaurent, and all this while your neighbor way over there is dying of thirst and hunger, then i would say THAT' S being greedy

forget the smokescreen of 5 or 6 gallons

Reply to pike



Listen, we go to war to protect those who cannot protect themselves from arrogant and insane human beings.

A perfect living family, in peace, loving each other all of a sudden has 10 guys come in, rape the females, kill the males, steal their food, and call that place their own.

We go to war, with them, to stop this. hence why Canada is in afghanistan, for example.

humans are born, innocent, its the world around them that corrupts them, makes them mad. Makes them irregular, causing them to hurt others. We need to stop them, from hurting the innocent.

the only way we would live in peace, is if everything lived in peace.

We can live in peace, and teach our children peace. But all it takes is that 1 .. lets say Bear, to attack a child, anger the child, when the child grows, he will take it out on another person, that person will feel confused, and have hatred, then it spreads, hatred, anger, spreads.

The world will never, Never be at peace.

hence why people who talk about peace, peace, peace is just trying to live a false reality.

Reply to sacre
- -1 +

ZP wrote:

........"If you don't stand up and defend what belongs to you someone will come and take it away. "


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

That isn't always true. I didn't always stand up for my wife and nobody came to take her away.

snif

however i did catch herpes and the doc can't explain how since i never fooled around

Reply to pike
Previous
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Old Man/Woman's Club > Other > The point of Tanks in war? what is it?
Go to:

There are 636 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them