Thanx for all the replies well now that that i think of it maybe I should just save up for the 8800GTS/GTX either one. I know the 1900GT is better than my card but according to toms hardware vga charts it only beats my card in a few things. I dont lot of thinking thinks for all the great suggestions
iv got a K8 system with a 8800gtx (cpu 3000+ lol slow) but the 8800 takes a hell of a lot of strain off of the cpu. i wouldnt say that any cpu is realy too slow to have an 8800 but it will limit it considirably. But it still increased my FPS on mst games by about 20%. Also wouldnt either a graphics card limit the cpu or the cpu limit graphics card anyway. So a 8800 will just let your CPU max out.
I'll get a 8800 gts or equivalent ATI product this summer and overclock my current cpu to 2.4 ghz on sig. I don't see it as a problem with your 6300 at the same speed. at lower resolutions your cpu will become more of a bottleneck but at the same time lower resolutions will provide you with more than enough fps anyway. As the resolution climbs games in general become more dependant on the gpu. So it kind of balances itself out. You can always upgrade to a quad core or e6600 and overclock to 3.2 ghz or more later when the prices drop. I see this as a way to always pay less than "bleeding edge" price for what you need. Just my two cents
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.