this post is for aubie because he is gone.
tommy boy has his jaguar and i have a shelby gt500....
http://www.phukface.com/shelby/dsc00117.jpg
http://www.phukface.com/shelby/dsc00118.jpg
http://www.phukface.com/shelby/dsc00119.jpg
http://www.phukface.com/shelby/dsc00120.jpg
http://www.phukface.com/shelby/dsc00121.jpg
Do you have any bigger pics? I couldn't quite see those without my specs.![]()
Nice, really nice.
PS.
I'll bet the berk with the Merc is a bit pissed off.
Edit for PS
[sig]


[/sig]
Very, very nice! Congrats!
Oh....look what's made in Canada.
http://www.dodge.ca/en/challenger/ [...] GgodlWYceg
Now I gotta get me one of those [/7 series]
Where's the Vtec?
It's a Ford. I see no reason to brag or waste pictures on it...
I'm sure you will have a blast in the car!!! Enjoy!
| Richie_W wrote : Where's the Vtec? |
Shoots Richie in the face point blank with a Mossberg 12 guage loaded with 00 buckshot.
A Ć’uckin Vtec can't produce enough torque to open a jar of pickles.
Actually, a Honda VTEC 3.5L V-6 produces 6lbs more torque than a 3.5L Ford V-6. And 8 more HP. With better mileage. Nearly all cars use some sort of variable valve timing nowadays. Honda's problem is they choose efficiency over cubic inches. I'd love to see them do a 4.5-5.0L V-8...sigh.
I'm with you on the torque though. My bud used to have an '88 Mustang GT. 300 ft lbs. A f*cking blast. Loved that car. That being said, although different, it's fun racing an early model S2000 with the 2.0 up to it's 9000rpm redline.
mine only has 500hp and 480 lbs of torque... [/cries]
| KingLoftusXII wrote : I'm with you on the torque though. My bud used to have an '88 Mustang GT. 300 ft lbs. A f*cking blast. Loved that car. That being said, although different, it's fun racing an early model S2000 with the 2.0 up to it's 9000rpm redline. |
or how about an rx7/rx8? whats the redline on those things again?
Good on you PF!!!!
They must pay a hell of a lot more in the military now then when I was in...... [shrug]
...*steals Lofty's beer (albeit temporarily) for encouraging Richie_wanker*...
Like you need an excuse to nick someone's grog....
True, true.
* sips some of Wingy's finest cognac *
I actually have a very fine collection of champagnes, and several top end vintage white burgundies.
| WingDing wrote : I actually |
Fixed.
*burp*
| WingDing wrote : I actually have a very fine collection of Pomagne, and several boxes of Black Tower and Blue Nun. |
Fixed.
I am rapidly considering a cluster bastage here.
| llama_man wrote : True, true.
|
That's low even for a Llama. Wingy will be needing that to celebrate his goalless draw. Not that he's in any way familiar with scoring!
[sig]


[/sig]
Wingy won't know it's missing. It's not like he even knows he owns it - he just paid for it.
He can rest assured, I will not lay a hoof on his malibu and pineapple supplies.
| WingDing wrote : I am rapidly considering a cluster bastage here. |
Given the normal speed of your thought, I will start getting concerned sometime next week.
Huh? What's that now?
Next week? That is still quick for a Mick.
[sig]


[/sig]
I only said I'd start getting concerned. It'll take months to get planning permission, construct and test the bastage shelter, get supplies etc.
| JustPlainJef wrote : It's an American car. I see no reason to brag or waste pictures on it...
|
fixed
I need to find a way to get in on this cluster bastage too...
I'd call it a cluster-fcuk, but Wingy would have no idea what the second half of that word means.
Huh? What's that now?
| mrface wrote : or how about an rx7/rx8? whats the redline on those things again? |
9,000 on the top RX-8, but you want to talk gutless torque...
| RobD wrote : ...*steals Lofty's beer (albeit temporarily) for encouraging Richie_wanker*... |
No worries, already shot him down as he asked about the smaller displacement ones. Blah.
Would you turn down a drive in Jenson's (pneumatic) VTEC?
| mrface wrote : mine only has 500hp and 480 lbs of torque... [/cries] |
Less torque than HP? On an American V-8? How will you ever cope?
Isn't the fuel econocmy on the RX8's absolutely ****?* Something like 20MPG
*It is.
Nice ride, Phukker.
Good to see you, bro.
| Richie_W wrote : Isn't the fuel econocmy on the RX8's absolutely ****?* Something like 20MPG
|
And they burn oil. Rapidly.
PF - congrats! Enjoy it!
More of what Aubie's missing!!!
Code :
|
St. Louis is in 4th place. What a shame!
Now all PF has to do is another 3 tours and he can afford to fill the focker up...
| audiovoodoo wrote : Now all PF has to do is another 3 tours and he can afford to fill the focker up... |
aint that the damned truth, lol.
Don't worry, I'm sure all that hard work getting shot at in the desert will help keep costs down
PS - Nice toy!
thanks bro.
i figured a little gift to meself for coming back alive was due...
hell the focus is geting up in years
Focus? Years? What, you ever drive it off the lot?
i have had the focus for 7 years now. got me where im going, great little car runs great, so i figured this time ill splurge a bit and get something nice. im still keeping the focus btw. ;P
The Focus isn't a bad car, providing you get the right model. A friend's wife has the model down from this.
| Tom_Smart wrote : The Focus isn't a bad car, providing you get the right model. A friend's wife has the model down from this.
|
yeah i have the zts(which they dont make any more i dont believe)
so you don't believe they don't make it anymore? are you suggesting they are lying to you alone over whether or not they produce a certain car?
There are 1278 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

