Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.webcam (
More info?)
Interesting,
I also have an Intel 430 Pro & i feel that my philips webcams have better
resolution. I have never tried
any of the Logitech Pro series webcams. but have
read that the Pro 4000 has the same sony chip/sensor
as the philips 740 & 840K webcams. With all the
money i invested in webcams, i could have purchased
a decent analog video camera & card & probably
have a quality webcam setup.
"Si Ballenger" <shb*NO*SPAM*@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:43092b15.1246388261@news.comporium.net...
> On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 23:24:00 GMT, "puns" <puns@verizon.net>
> wrote:
>
>>Si,
>>My webcams work from downloaded drivers from the phillips site, but there
>>are particular aspects of the webcams that need the software for full
>>efficiency. An interesting observation is, my philips webcams appear to
>>have
>>better resolution than my 3com home connect webcam.
>
> I've got several older analog Philips cams and they all have CCD
> sensors. A while back Philips released a cam in europe called
> something like the Tucam that reportedly had very good resolution
> and low light capability. Don't think it was ever released in the
> states. I've got a couple of Intel 430 pro usb cams that have
> good resolution and low light operation. the logitech pro seems
> to be the best usb cam generally available now, besides the 3com
> which is still available as the watchport for a price from
> ionetworks (below). Cams with Sony chips are good, but don't know
> of any usb types.
>
>
http://www.ionetworks.com/products/environmentalmonitoring/watchportv.jsp
>