Tom's Hardware Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » C2D E6400/E6420 difference in preformance
 

C2D E6400/E6420 difference in preformance

Add a reply



 Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : C2D E6400/E6420 difference in preformance
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

Is the extra 2MB of L2 cache make much of a difference in preformance?

Related Pr oduct
Register or log in to remove.

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2 [...] ors/5.html
 
Check that article out
 
Summary of your question is as said by the article.

Quote :


The amount of L2 cache does appear to make a difference - virtually across the board - but the difference isn't as big as some were making it out to be. In the application benchmarks, we found that there was a difference of around 2-3% on average. Both the large and small file compression and encryption tests really benefited from the additional cache, yielding performance improvements of between 6-9%.


 

Quote :

Overall, the Core 2 Duo with 4MB of L2 cache is quicker than the 2MB Core 2 Duos at the same clock speed, but there are several instances where there is little-to-no difference in performance.

Profile: stranger
More Information

Thanks, that was very helpful.

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

No problems, that's what we're here for. We're always glad to help if it's a validly genuine question or problem you need information and/or help on.


Go to:
Add a reply
  Tom's Hardware Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » C2D E6400/E6420 difference in preformance
 

Google Ads
Ad