G
Guest
Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.general (More info?)
Hello all - hoping to get some help...
I have a 160 Gig Maxtor HDD on a W2K system dual booting with W98.
The motherboard is an Abit KR7A Raid and the disk is on a raid controller,
which supports 48 bit addressing. Lates bios and drivers are used which all
support 144 bit addressing.
SP4 is installed and the large disk bit in the registry is enabled.
The disk is split into 3 roughly equal partitions which were formatted in
DOS as FAT32.
Disk Management reports the disk and each partition correctly with respect
to overall size and free space. The assigned drive letters are a bit all over
the place though. (I have 4 disks, all partitioned, although only 1 > 137 g)
However! Windows 2000 refuses to use the disk beyond 137 gig, and I am
completely lost as to why as everything seems OK. Does it not like that the
disk is partitioned? Does it not like FAT32?
Any ideas would be very welcome!
Thank you
Hello all - hoping to get some help...
I have a 160 Gig Maxtor HDD on a W2K system dual booting with W98.
The motherboard is an Abit KR7A Raid and the disk is on a raid controller,
which supports 48 bit addressing. Lates bios and drivers are used which all
support 144 bit addressing.
SP4 is installed and the large disk bit in the registry is enabled.
The disk is split into 3 roughly equal partitions which were formatted in
DOS as FAT32.
Disk Management reports the disk and each partition correctly with respect
to overall size and free space. The assigned drive letters are a bit all over
the place though. (I have 4 disks, all partitioned, although only 1 > 137 g)
However! Windows 2000 refuses to use the disk beyond 137 gig, and I am
completely lost as to why as everything seems OK. Does it not like that the
disk is partitioned? Does it not like FAT32?
Any ideas would be very welcome!
Thank you