Ad
News

Storage Networking World conference opens its doors

Published on October 27, 2004

Several storage suppliers are adding to their arsenal of products and technologies aimed at IT managers dealing with the explosion of data storage at Storage Networking World in Orlando this week. Read more

Silicon Graphics unveils 4-Gig fibre channel array

Published on February 08, 2005

Silicon Graphics unveiled its SGI Infinite Storage TP9700 RAID storage array Tuesday, claiming it is the industry's first Fibre Channel storage array equipped with a 4Gb/second interface. Read more

Storage virtualization tools refined

Published on April 02, 2005

IBM, Network Appliance Inc. Read more

Core 2 Duo processors now included in Tom's Hardware's CPU charts

Published on August 21, 2006

Tom's Hardware has updated its interactive CPU charts with the latest processors from Intel and AMD. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

System Builder Marathon: $1,250 Mid-Range PC

Published on December 30, 2008

We see how far $1,250 gets us when building a new Core i7-based system, and how it compares to last month’s similarly priced Core 2 Duo machine. Read more

SSDs Replacing HDDs Soon? Not A Chance

Published on December 29, 2008

Some say 2010 and even 2009 will be the year of SSDs. We think not. Read more

System Builder Marathon: $625 Gaming PC

Published on December 29, 2008

Unsurprisingly, hardware prices have dropped since our System Builder Marathon last month, which means we have access to more processing power at our same $625 entry-level price point for gamers. Come check out the configuration Paul put together! Read more

Tom's Overdrive Competition: Finals Recap

Published on December 25, 2008

With the Overdrive overclocking competition two weeks behind us and Team USA victorious, we wanted to check in with a quick recap of our final contest held in Paris, France. Read more

  Tom's Hardware Forums » TomsNetworking » Article Discussions » Networked Storage (NAS) Charts
 

Networked Storage (NAS) Charts




Word :   Username :  
 
 Page : 1 2
Previous
Author
 Thread : Networked Storage (NAS) Charts
 
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

We've gathered throughput data from our many NAS reviews for easy comparison. What do you think?

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: stranger
More Information

It looks like the Synology Disk Station DS-106E wins hands down in price vs performance.

There is more information on the DS-106e here

http://www.keenansystems.com/store [...] cts_id=182

Profile: stranger
More Information

I'm surprised to not see the Linksys NSLU2 anywhere in the listings? You did so many articles about hacking it, I thought you'd keep it in the NAS groupings.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

I wondered if anyone would notice! :)

Didn't add it because the data is pretty old and didn't test above 128MB file size.

I'll get it set up again soon, rerun the data and add it.

The relevant datapoints I have are for 64 MB file size (64 KB record size):
- 5.1 MB/sec write
- 4.2 MB/sec read

Profile: stranger
More Information

Tim,
After re-collecting the data, would you be willing to remove the 133 MHz CPU clock limitation of the NSLU2 so the CPU can run at 266 MHz and then collect data again?

The reason I ask, is because the NSLU2 is now being sold with the CPU clock at 266 MHz. I would be nice to document a comparison of perfomance.

Thanks for considering my inquiry!

Profile: stranger
More Information

Will you add the ReadyNAS 1000S?

Will you add some Jumboframe for GB?

Good job anyway...:D

Profile: stranger
More Information

:D Thanks a ton for putting this analysis together, I've been jonezing for 1TB of consumer-grade NAS and haven't found anything really for under 1K worth buying. At this point I'm thinking that buying a bunch of cheap SATA drives, chaining them together with a pre-owned server, and using xcopy for backup from one disk to the other is going to be the best/cheapest way to simulate NAS and RAID in my home network. If anyone has other thoughts, I'd love to hear them.

Profile: stranger
More Information

It should be interesting when the Qnap TS-101's performance is added to the chart! :)

Quote :

It looks like the Synology Disk Station DS-106E wins hands down in price vs performance.

There is more information on the DS-106e here

http://www.keenansystems.com/store [...] cts_id=182

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

Quote :

:D Thanks a ton for putting this analysis together, I've been jonezing for 1TB of consumer-grade NAS and haven't found anything really for under 1K worth buying....


You'll be interested in an article coming up next week, then.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

Quote :

Will you add the ReadyNAS 1000S?


Probably not anytime soon

Quote :

Will you add some Jumboframe for GB?


I have data for gigabit and Jumbo frames, but not for many products. The jumbo frame data tends to be for RAID 5 configurations, which need a chart of their own.

I will add both the jumbo frame and RAID 5 charts when more products are added. Meanwhile, check the reviews for the products themselves and you'll find jumbo frame data.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

Quote :

Tim,
After re-collecting the data, would you be willing to remove the 133 MHz CPU clock limitation of the NSLU2 so the CPU can run at 266 MHz and then collect data again?


I can do this if the clock limitation is removed by newer firmware. Is it?

Profile: stranger
More Information

A lot of these performance numbers are ridiculously bad. Specifically, a gigabit-equipped NAS should give at least 20 MB/s both read and write to justify its gigabit capability. I use a Linux machine at home as a file server, and can write to it at 35 MB/s and read at 28 MB/s.

I also have a Kuro-Box at home, a Linux-based BYOD gigabit NAS from Buffalo. Having played with its configuration for a while, I came to the conclusion that its rather poor stock performance (about 5 MB/s read/write if I remember correctly) was due to the TCP send and receive buffers being set far too small. After adjusting them, I got about 12 MB/s both read and write. At this point, transfers are more than likely limited by the slow (266 MHz, I think) processor. I'd venture to guess that all these gigabit NAS products which turn out less than 100 Mbps are limited by one of these two issues.

Having experienced transfer rates consistently over 20 MB/s between my gigabit-connected Windows machines, I soon abandoned the Kuro-Box in favor of a full file server. When it comes to performance (and I move a lot of very large files around), there's no comparison.

Cheers.

Profile: stranger
More Information

Any idea if/when you might review the Thecus N5200 and do some comparisons with the ReadyNAS NV? I'm looking now at a solution and really like the ReadyNAS NV but as always want more performance.

Here is a link I found but it doesn't do many performance tests or comparisons.

http://www.hexus.net/content/item. [...] 181&page=1

BTW, I love the consolidated charts.

Profile: stranger
More Information

Tim,

Quote :

I can do this if the clock limitation is removed by newer firmware. Is it?



Nope, it's done in hardware. All you have to do is remove a resistor. You can find info in the UnSlung community HERE.

I've been running an NSLU2 without this resistor now for 9 months, not a single problem. Hopefully this is something you'll venture to try.

Profile: stranger
More Information

Quote :

Any idea if/when you might review the Thecus N5200 and do some comparisons with the ReadyNAS NV? ...


What's the word??

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

Quote :

Any idea if/when you might review the Thecus N5200 and do some comparisons with the ReadyNAS NV? ...


What's the word??
Considering it, but no definite plans at this time.

Profile: stranger
More Information