Using Gigabyte's GA-965P-DS3 motherboard, our engineering sample was able to run at 3.375GHz (375MHz x 9.0) at 1.468V using a stock Intel cooler. Although the E4300 still only has a 2MB L2 cache, when overclocked to over 3.3GHz you end up with a chip that's faster than Intel's Core 2 Extreme X6800 - at only $163. The E4300 gets even better in Q2 when its price will drop from $163 to $133, making it even more of a bargain.
Im curious on something. With the OC potental of C2D, how much of a difference does the higher L2 size make?
I mean if you were to set up a E6600 with the same speeds (3.3Ghz), so that the only difference was the cache between the E6600 and the E4300, how much of a performance difference would you see?
Are we talking a 2-3 FPS/10 sec faster encoding difference or are we looking at 10+% changes?
http://anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2795&p=4 has a detailed analysis on this topic.
In a nutshell, there is a 3.5% average difference between 4MB and 2MB, though it can be as high as 10% in video encoding.