Supreme Court deals death blow to antiporn law
| Quote : ... On Wednesday, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected prosecutors' last-ditch defense of the Child Online Protection Act, meaning that the law will not be enforced.
|
Hmm, something is very wrong there, it appears common sense was being used. In a court.
Whew!!!
For a moment, I thought I was going to lose my favorite Flash games.
Yeah. Good thing for the disclaimer page - no way a minor could possibly make it past that.
| Jake_Barnes wrote : Good news for us Porn affectionatos (in the US) |
Wingdings passport has been revoked?

Wingdings don't have passports...they teleport.
Yes....anywhere, at any time....no-one is safe......
i must admit this bit worrys me; "It is not the role of the government to decide what people can see and do on the Internet," ACLU staff attorney Chris Hansen said in a statement on Wednesday. "Those are personal decisions that should be made by individuals and their families."
cause does that mean that child peados are now allowed to look at those kinds of photos? because its "up to them and there families" ?
If the photos themselves are illegal, then no.
Aren't there a bunch of other weird rules in place for pr0n though? Like no actual pics of coitus (although they are allowed, obviously, in flicks).
And I do not think the c-shot is SO popular that every flik out there has it (although I wouldn't know, seeing how I am a pure and God fearing individual!!!). Isn't there some sort of rule preventing the male from finishing inside?
WTF is up with that crap? We over protect on the things that really do not matter and end up giving out adolescents complexes that bug them for life.
The Wingding should be in charge of such matters.
Yes, oddly enough a Wingding would probably be the right thing for the job.
Wingdings should be in charge of porn quality control.
My wallet is definitely never safe.
There is a shot/sequence in pr0n called a 'cream pie', where the male ejaculates inside the willing subject, being either anal or vaginal, and the ejaculate is then allowed to exit the orifice in basic adherence to the Newtonian laws of physics.
Ergo, therefore, and maybe, this implies that no rule exists in pr0n that prohibits a male from ejaculating in aforementioned willing subject.
(Mugz' brother)...
I don't believe in rules.
Does anyone here?
| WingDing wrote : I don't believe in rules. |
The above statement is hypocritical! Simply by communicating the thought that you don't believe in rules by using a form of communication that is strictly governed by established grammatical norms implies that you are contradicting yourself.
(Mugz' brother)
....*in an attempt to move on from the subject, makes sudden sweet love to Jebus*...
Mugz, I know what you are saying, but it seems odd that so many (or so I have heard) films seem it necessary to show a mostly male audience another guy spewing out all over an attractive woman. I have (heard) of a few of the shots you have talked about, but they are in the minority...
Also, what is up with no actual coitus in porn mags. Are they too public to be that pubic? Strange rules we have here....
Sex has some bloody odd rules, I agree.
So do I.
...*demonstrates on Jebus*...
Wingy they invented that during the Spanish Inquisition.
...uhhhhh.....ahhhh......ehhhhhh.....
Quiet please, the WingDing is working....
....ahhhhh.....mmmmmmm......oh yeah......
>SHOOM<
NNNNNNNOBODY EXPECTS The Spanish......
What, you've heard this before?
..*Brings out the Comfy Chair.*..
..*Repeatedly smashes Comfy Chair on NH.*..
Where's the beer?
Here some Heineken...I know...It's not Coors...Light!
Hey Wingy...have you blown your load?
He always does.
Why, is your skin melting?
Wasn't my fault. I had a sudden mental image of Auburn and Riser wrestling in a pool of baby oil.
...*cums in pants again*...
| zpyrd wrote : Where's the beer?
|
/me grabs Heineken.
/me puts Heineken in oven.
/me removes Heineken, pisses in it, and puts in freezer
/me removes from freezer adds salt water, hands back to Zyp.
Man! I never knew making Coors Light would be so much work!!!
Or is that Bud Light...
| exit2dos wrote : ..*Brings out the Comfy Chair.*..
|
+ 5 genetic cleansing

*performs Nazi salute*
Now, when do we start with the Jews?
Right after we get rid of the country of skirt wearing men

You're just jealous.
Actually, Im afraid. Very afraid. Men who wear skirts scare me. Hillary Clinton for example.

It's ok. Strangest is actually just a badly advised transsexual.
He was one of my best patients.
Okay, what's the difference?
In this case probably a reach-around.
No, that's how they settle the bill. Or at least it's one of the payment options.
| audiovoodoo wrote : It's ok. Strangest is actually just a badly advised transsexual. |
Whats that make Hillary?

Sectary Of State........ [barf]
There are 1343 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

