Tom's Hardware > Forum > Windows 2000/NT > Windows 2000/NT General Discussion > Question about local security settings vs GPO's

Question about local security settings vs GPO's

Forum Windows 2000/NT : Windows 2000/NT General Discussion - Question about local security settings vs GPO's

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.group_policy (More info?)

 

When I start SECPOL.MSC on one of my XP workstations in my
2000 domain and I look at the local security settings I
have several items that are defined. For example, 'Load
and Unload Device Drivers' is set to Administrators.

Now when I run a RSoP on that same XP workstation the
computer setting is 'Not Configured'. No where in my AD
is that item defined. I was under the impression that
LSDOU (local site domain ou) was the way policies are over
written but if they aren't configured in the upper part of
the higharchy (an OU for example) then the lowest setting
wins. If that is the case then how is the local security
settings getting changes from defined to not defined?

Thanks.

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.group_policy (More info?)

 

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 07:18:50 -0700, "Todd S" <toddflbass@{IHATESPAM}yahoo.com>
wrote:

>When I start SECPOL.MSC on one of my XP workstations in my
>2000 domain and I look at the local security settings I
>have several items that are defined. For example, 'Load
>and Unload Device Drivers' is set to Administrators.
>
>Now when I run a RSoP on that same XP workstation the
>computer setting is 'Not Configured'. No where in my AD
>is that item defined. I was under the impression that
>LSDOU (local site domain ou) was the way policies are over
>written but if they aren't configured in the upper part of
>the higharchy (an OU for example) then the lowest setting
>wins. If that is the case then how is the local security
>settings getting changes from defined to not defined?
>
>Thanks.


See tip 4252 in the 'Tips & Tricks' at http://www.jsiinc.com

Jerold Schulman
Windows: General MVP
JSI, Inc.
http://www.jsiinc.com

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.group_policy (More info?)

 

Thanks but I don't really see how that tip document helps.

>-----Original Message-----
>On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 07:18:50 -0700, "Todd S" <toddflbass@
{IHATESPAM}yahoo.com>
>wrote:
>
>>When I start SECPOL.MSC on one of my XP workstations in
my
>>2000 domain and I look at the local security settings I
>>have several items that are defined. For example, 'Load
>>and Unload Device Drivers' is set to Administrators.
>>
>>Now when I run a RSoP on that same XP workstation the
>>computer setting is 'Not Configured'. No where in my AD
>>is that item defined. I was under the impression that
>>LSDOU (local site domain ou) was the way policies are
over
>>written but if they aren't configured in the upper part
of
>>the higharchy (an OU for example) then the lowest
setting
>>wins. If that is the case then how is the local
security
>>settings getting changes from defined to not defined?
>>
>>Thanks.
>
>
>See tip 4252 in the 'Tips & Tricks' at
http://www.jsiinc.com
>
>Jerold Schulman
>Windows: General MVP
>JSI, Inc.
>http://www.jsiinc.com
>.
>

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Windows 2000/NT > Windows 2000/NT General Discussion > Question about local security settings vs GPO's
Go to:

There are 1166 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them